346
Leadership should have been purged after the 2016 debacle.
But it's not too late to do that now.
"People were very ARROUSED..."
Old coots backing old coots. WTF!?!?! Stop voting for these old asswipes, who are slightly less evil than the current GOP. Shove off into retirement Schumer, you stole enough from the US taxpayers.
The Baileys will not be happy about this.
I try not to hate people, as a rule. I don't want to hate anyone, but I do sometimes and I spend lots of time thinking about why that might be and how I can stop. It's usually pretty simple. Our government makes it so, so fucking difficult to manage that.
He knows that. He also knows he works for Israel before the USA.
The Senator from Tel Aviv
It's his job, guys. He has a responsibility to his Isreali constituents. He takes that very seriously. Also his imaginary Trump voting couple. Weird fucking guy.
OoooOooooOOh I am the ghooost of Bailey past. WOOOoooOOOOOoooo you have to baaaack Israeeeel.
Get fucked chuck!
“It is not acceptable when you are one of 100 people in the country who hold the position of United States senator to go on national news and say, ‘Well, the Democrats aren't in charge right now, I guess we can't do anything,’” she said.
Aipac politicians should all be voted out
they should be arrested and tried for being subversive foreign agents who have abused their power to favor a foreign power instead of their own constituents and country.
Politicians should be forced to retire.
I’m fully in favor of term limits. Not a small term limit. Something like 12 terms. At 2 years each, that’s 24 years. Long enough for a respectable career, and they can take a good retirement afterwards. If you enter politics in your 30’s and manage to stay in office that long, you’re retired by your 50’s and can move on to other ventures. It’s enough to ensure congress isn’t constantly full of newbies who don’t know what they’re doing. And it prevents the old voters from screeching about age discrimination, because there is no age cap; old people want old representatives? Those reps simply shouldn't start running for office until they’re in their 50’s or 60’s.
Every politician should have an exit vote when they leave office, where their constituents vote whether the politician goes to prison, is executed, or goes free.
I'm sure they would start trying to make their voters lives better.
That actually sounds awesome.
Agreed, I really like such an idea. I think another option of giving them a tip or bonus if they were exceptional would also be nice. A carrot to go with the sticks, so to speak.
Only if their constituents vote on an all-or-nothing bonus. Not individuals tipping politicians because that would easily be abused by the wealthy and is basically a bribe.
Yes, agreed. I was thinking more like a stipend that's been put aside during their years of service. Did a good job? You get the money that was put aside. If not, well it just rolls back into the government's budget for the next worthy politician.
Maybe we could just make their pension contingent on the same exit vote where their constituents decide whether or not they go to jail.
Term limits and age limits.
Automatic consequences, too. For example, a president who initiates war (without even declaring it!), has to get congressional approval within 10 days. Failure to secure approval is automatic removal from office, and imprisonment. If thirty days pass without congress forgiving the transgression, execution is carried out, and the general public is permitted to do the deed without punishment.
That sort of thing would make office holders much more reluctant to abuse their stations.
Strongly concur!
Release the 2024 DNC post-election report, you fucking cowards
In case anyone isn't in-the-know, DNC leadership is refusing to release the autopsy report from the 2024 election season during which Democrats received record funding ($1bn) yet lost even the popular vote. Why? They say so we can focus on the "lessons learned" that DNC leadership arrived at, NOT the report itself and how they came to those conclusive lessons. For all we know, the "lessons" could be manufactured by DNC leadership to stall party reform.
Video by The Majority Report covering it.
I wish Schumer would just buy a lake house, a walk-in closet full of weed, and just disappear
Damn I love this way of putting someone should retire. So good gonna steal.
Every politician in the national and all state capitals should have a taxpayer funded, guided Ayahuasca trip, once a year. It should also be counted as taxable income.
WHY? Chuck knows EXACTLY what ~~Americans~~ Israelis WANT! That's LITERALLY the Definition of the DNC!
Looks like his ego is bigger than trumps? Why doesn't he listen to what his own voters want? Geez
Heh. As soon as I saw she’d dropped out I thought, “Ouch. Chuck takes it in the nuts. That’s gotta hurt.”
And yes, he needs to hand off the baton already.
Handing off the baton implies to me he has some role in selecting a successor. I don't even want him to do that. He's just bad at politics.
Also one of the problems with Mills was being too old, and Chuck is just 3 years younger. Hopefully he takes it personally.
Well he’s the minority leader in the Senate. Give it up, y’know. Amongst the other things
What is it going to take to get Schumer to just fuck off and go away?
Do we really need to send some guy with a hammer?
I've been hoping some MAGA Republican would do the job for over a year now :P
They have no reason to. He's not in their way at all.
Did Schumer have a nasty fall sometime before this picture? Like, grandpa, go home, enjoy your family. Hell, let someone younger who knows what's going on be in charge. We're ruled by old people who should have retired a decade ago...
wait wtf you're right. did someone hit him over the head with a hammer? Why is there a giant Band-Aid over half his forehead????
a decade ago
...
~~a~~ decades ago
Much better.
The Democrats, or more directly their donors, will just use PAC money to do these things, they’ll invent some bullshit names for them like how AIPAC is making up bullshit “progressive” PAC’s to do these same things against progressives who don’t align with their agenda.
Step off Chuck! And also, go step yourself!
this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
346 points (100.0% liked)
politics
29618 readers
1677 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS