[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

Putin at one point was the US' favored guy, as Yeltsin's heir

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 6 points 3 hours ago

British press is already there. Anything to pretend it wasn't Israel.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 15 points 9 hours ago

It was one thing to be stupid enough to believe Trump was actually going to go against "the swamp" in 2016.

But in 2024? HE HAD ALREADY BEEN PRESIDENT YOU FUCKING IDIOTS.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Worked as an American consultant for the Dutch government in IT, can confirm this absolutely. It's a case of finding private companies to funnel money to instead of actually creating capacity, all because of the incorrect illusion that the private sector is magically efficient.

My unofficial advice to my colleagues while leaving my posting was "stop hiring people like me. Spend the money on developing good internal devs".

2

cross-posted from: https://lemmus.org/post/20301599

California’s new bill requires DOJ-approved 3D printers that report on themselves targeting general-purpose machines.

Assembly Member Bauer-Kahan introduced AB-2047, the “California Firearm Printing Prevention Act,” on February 17th. The bill would ban the sale or transfer of any 3D printer in California unless it appears on a state-maintained roster of approved makes and models… certified by the Department of Justice as equipped with “firearm blocking technology.” Manufacturers would need to submit attestations for every make and model. The DOJ would publish a list. If your printer isn’t on the list by March 1, 2029, it can’t be sold. In addition, knowingly disabling or circumventing the blocking software is a misdemeanor.

151
1
[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, I would switch from my Framework to a Slimbook if they offered upgradability.

They could make parts that work to the Framework spec, that is open source, which would he awesome.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

Must be nice to decide that Ukraine has to keep fighting when you're not one of the conscripts dying.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 16 hours ago

Britain didn't suspend elections in WWII, they used a parliamentary trick to avoid them.

Nobody doubts Britain's a democracy

They're a monarchy. Without a constitution.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do you not understand that just because something is to Russia's advantage, and Russia wants it to happen, does not mean that Russia can make it happen?

If you think Brexit was to the benefit of Russia, and you oppose Russia's government (as you should) - OK. Then why wouldn't you want to address the root causes that are powering anti-EU parties all over? Take away the fuel.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

To aid it and make it worse?

The West pretty much showed to Russia in the 1990s and 2000s that it was going to consider international relations a zero sum game. So Russia is of course going to work to make the problems the US and UK have worse, as the US has done with Russia.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

Lol what? You think that because Russia spread some money around Brexit only exists because of Russia?

It's like the idiots in the US that ignore 70 million people voted for Trump, and want to pretend the only reason for that is that Russia spent $100,000 on Facebook ads. Because they don't want to address the actual problems that's destroying their societies. Much easier to just claim it's all Putler or something.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 14 points 1 day ago

Russia's more than happy to throw gas on the fire, for sure.

But they didn't start it. They're taking advantage of the failures of capitalist neoliberalism in the West for their own advantage, but - and this is crucial - the existence of those failures is not something paranoia about Russia can address.

In the US, you literally had people from the Democratic party discussing how BLM was a Russian front, because the Russians were happy to show how the US treated people. But Russia didn't put those racist cops, Russia didn't give them immunity - Russia didn't make the US have the world's largest prison population that's overwhelmingly minority.

You don't want Brexit, don't have wealth gaps and massive housing costs so people can be pushed to blame their shitty lives on Polish immigrants.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

everything bad in the world ever is Russia! Russia! Russia!

1
1

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/43334510

The Department of Justice spoke four separate times to a woman who credibly accused Donald Trump of having sex with a minor he met through Jeffrey Epstein—but most accusations against the president appear to have been removed from the government’s documents on the alleged sex trafficker. 

21-page slideshow buried in the massive trove of Epstein-related documents included allegations that sometime between 1983 and 1985, Trump forced a woman to give him oral sex when she was in her early teens. When the woman bit down on Trump’s exposed penis, he allegedly punched her in the head and kicked her out. That same woman told the DOJ that Epstein had introduced her to Trump in 1984.

Yet last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi insisted that there was “no evidence” that Trump had committed any crime—adding to the growing pile of denials from Trump officials that constitute a sweeping cover-up of the president’s alleged wrongdoing. 

Justice Department records indicate that the FBI spoke to this woman not once but at least four separate times, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger. Now those records appear to have been removed from public viewing—despite the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires all documents relating to the alleged sex trafficker to be made public. 

Sollenberger discovered a record of four separate interviews, which took place in the summer of 2019, in a separate database of documents downloaded from the government’s public files on Epstein. That document indicated that the first of the four interviews was conducted on July 24, 2019, and the last conducted on October 16, 2019. That document was given to Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyers as part of her trial, though the specific allegations predated Maxwell’s involvement with Epstein, Sollenberger wrote.

The woman’s first interview was entered into the FBI’s case files on August 9, 2019, just one day before Epstein was found dead in his jail cell. FBI agents typically have a deadline of five working days to file interview write-ups, indicating an abnormal 16-day gap, Sollenberger noted.

1
1

Bad material circumstances.

He also describes the best way to stop it - making it plain it won't get you laid.

1
1
Still alive? (lemmy.today)
1
1

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42758868

Newly released Department of Justice documents show that investigators reviewing surveillance footage from the night of Jeffrey Epstein's death observed an orange-colored shape moving up a staircase toward the isolated, locked tier where his cell was located at approximately 10:39 p.m. on Aug. 9, 2019.

That entry in an observation log of the video from the Metropolitan Correctional Center appears to suggest something previously unreported by authorities: "A flash of orange looks to be going up the L Tier stairs — could possibly be an inmate escorted up to that Tier."

It also appears, according to an FBI memorandum, that reviews by investigators led to disparate conclusions by the FBI and those examining the same video from the Department of Justice's Office of Inspector General.

1
view more: next ›

mattyroses

joined 3 weeks ago
MODERATOR OF