386

Donald Trump’s “gold card” visa, where a foreigner can shell out at least $1 million to legally live and work in the U.S., has been approved for one person, said Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick Thursday — appearing to fall a bit short of an earlier claim.

After it launched in December, Lutnick said that the government had sold $1.3 billion “worth” in just several days, as Trump stood by holding up the gilded ticket and said, “essentially it’s the green card on steroids.”

Lutnick did not address the apparent discrepancy in an exchange with a congresswoman at Thursday’s committee hearing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 130 points 5 days ago

Can you imagine the type of creep you’d have to be to want to pay a million space bucks to move to USA right now?

[-] artyom@piefed.social 67 points 4 days ago

If I were a billionaire looking to become as rich as humanly possible, and I know I can simply bribe the govt to fuck their constituents, I'd absolutely be doing that. So yeah, that kind of creep.

[-] 1D10@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah but you don't need american citizenship to do that they will sell out to anyone.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 4 days ago

You need to run a business in America.

[-] 1D10@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

No you don't.

Hundreds of companies are owned by foreign owners.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

I didn't say businesses werent owned by foreigners...

[-] 0li0li@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Can you imagine an IMMIGRANT who'd want to pay a million space bucks to be hunted down by ICE right now?

[-] agingelderly@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Not a non-white one, anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Just someone looking to exploit Americans for more money.

[-] SpatchyIsOnline@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

You'd have to pay me a million dollars to move to the US right now...

Actually, no I think the amount would be significantly more than that

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Jesus Christ! I thought it was only a thousand spacebucks…

[-] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 31 points 4 days ago

The worst part is, other countries have done this, we just did it in the worst way possible.

There are several countries where if you invest enough in the economy through trade and businesses you can actually get a visa. But you have to actually invest in the economy not just throw a million dollars at some orange dickhead.

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 4 points 4 days ago

Many countries have investor visas. The US has one still! I think the law was investing at least 1 million USD in a mostly or wholely American owned company or starting a business that employs at least 10 people.

[-] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah but the investor visas involve investment and growth in the country, not just a million dollar "donation" to the government. It feels less like "improve the country and you will be welcome" and more "be rich and we will let you in the boys club"

[-] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 1 points 1 day ago

Exactly. No one starts a business that employs 10 people just so they can simply live in a country.

What trump wants is legalized bribery.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago

The types of visas that are available and the rules for them are set by laws passed by Congress. Trump doesn't have the power to just unilaterally create a new visa category. So if you look at the fine print, this is actually some other already existing category that allows the president to admit individuals at discretion, and the fee is just a donation to the US Treasury. That's also why it's not racking up a bunch of court challenges.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 27 points 4 days ago

Trump doesn't have the power to

Until such a time as someone actually stops him from doing whatever the fuck he wants, he absolutely does.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

Trump doesn't have the power to just unilaterally…

it's incredible to me that, today, there are people in the USA who think rules and laws still apply… this is at week 6 of a not-a-war that the orange pedophile did not have the power to unilaterally commit the country to

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

I mean where have you been? If laws and rules no longer had any meaning then why is the administration being forced to give back the tariff money and repeal them? Why was the admistration forced to re-hire thousands of federal employees it illegally terminated? Why was the national gaurd forced to leave several cities?

These were all decided by the courts and the administration complied. I'm not saying compliance is perfect, and I'm not saying the administration isn't trying to do very undemocratic things. But clearly there is still some rule of law.

Also yes the president can wage war like that. We do have a law on the books that gives the president basically 60 days to do whatever he wants with the military. Cold war era law that was poorly written

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

We do have a law on the books that gives the president basically 60 days to do whatever he wants with the military

lol it was 30 day when this war started that "military operations" were allowed… it's been 54 day to today, I'm sure you'll be arguing an extension in 6 days to pretend there is still some level of control

my point is that drawing the conclusion that, if trump did x it must be legal somehow because he could not posibly do an illegal thing is laughable

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm sorry you were misinformed but it's been 60 days since 1973.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/24/trumps-may-1-deadline-can-he-continue-war-on-iran-after-that

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution

The War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30-day withdrawal period, without congressional authorization for use of military force

Basically a President can tell Congress I'm doing this. Do whatever for 60 days, then they have another 30 days to wind down the conflict and withdrawal troops.

Basically Trump can be there for 90 days without breaking any laws. I'm not saying we should be there or that Trump doesn't break laws. He clearly does both of those he's a felon after all, but if we are just plain wrong and call legal things illegal then it distracts from the actual crimes.

The presidential war powers act needs to be repealed, but that's another topic

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Ok then... we'll talk in 36 days so I can hear the next excuse ;-)

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago

There will be no excuse then it can be added to the list of crimes that in a just world we'd hang his cheeto crusted ass for.

Now stop being a smug weirdo about it

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Sorry, can't hear you over the high horse you are ridding on a dumpster of a country

[-] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Edit: ignore me. @arrow74@lemmy.zip has a better comment that brings the receipts.

Not sound like a Devil's Advocate, but IIRC from High School history, Lincoln had the authority to mobilize the US Army for 90 days to fight the Confederates. Seems like that was a major part of the delay in declaring the Civil War a war (that is, the Union thought the Confederates would be easily pushed over w/i the 3 months that Lincoln could just do whatever he wanted with the Army).

As good as Lincoln was, I understand he played a bit fast and loose with war time powers of the president and most contemporary criticism of him was relayed to to that.

But anyway, I assumed that power hadn't been significantly changed over the century and a half since.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

It's incredible to me that, today, you're willing to just give up all rules and laws without even an argument.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

my dude, i can argue with someone who agrees with me or i can argue with the wall. i can't argue with someone in charge. i'd rather go play pogs

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Look at all the “HE CAN’T DO THAT”s in the rearview mirror and tell us we’re wrong.

I swear to Christ, US liberals have had Groundhog Day syndrome for a solid year. Things have escalated and your response hasn’t changed a fucking iota.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

recognizing the laws have no teeth or enforcement is not giving them up, it's simply accepting the problem which is the very first step to solve it

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

Trump doesn’t have the power to just unilaterally create a new visa category.

He gets to order ICE around and they get to decide who actually gets the rough treatment.

That said, I wouldn't count on this visa being worth much once Trump is gone. So I can understand why nobody is enthusiastic about paying his bribe.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

Why do you know that it's going to the treasury and rules have never stopped him before.

[-] waigl@lemmy.world 33 points 4 days ago

The Trump administration has been known to just randomly, unilaterally withdraw visas on a whim. You'd have to be crazy to accept that bargain when they just might kick you out anyway and keep your money.

[-] DokPsy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Or take the fees for applications but not process any of them. As they are currently doing

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago

Is it one of his pedophile friends?

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A guy by the name of Geoff Eppstone apparently.

[-] inari@piefed.zip 27 points 4 days ago

Crazy that this doesn't outright buy citizenship, like some European countries do/used to do. Makes it a much smaller value.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Canada has a similar buy a visa system. But it's for investing rather than just buying.

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Those didn't outright buy citizenship either. They gave permanent residency permits could later be converted to citizenship based on the country's naturalization laws.

Which is exactly what a green card is

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago
[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 9 points 4 days ago

Some how the US is run by the biggest morons.

[-] FatVegan@leminal.space 3 points 4 days ago

As it is tradition. But they take it a bit far now, how do you even top that?

[-] EvilBit@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

I really really really really want to see in the news soon that this person still got disappeared by ICE for being the wrong color.

[-] Ele7en7@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

It's Nicki Minaj, so she probably won't get disappeared. They need her propaganda.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

This entire administration all behave like cartoon supervillians.

Watching that smug little shit Lutnick evading questions that he wants to answer when the cameras are off is really quite something.

[-] TehWorld@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Cartoon supervillains generally have a coherent plan and goal. These clowns just seem to want to watch the world burn.

[-] Dr_Fetus_Jackson@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Yeah, well fuck him and fuck them.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Fuck all the evil people

[-] texture@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

what a rip off

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
386 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29576 readers
1849 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS