[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Kill -9 is a command on Unix and Linux to send signal 9 (SIGKILL) to a process. That's the version of kill that is the most reliable and has immediate effect.

Taskkill is a Windows command line program. I believe that taskkill /f uses the TerminateProcess() API. This is more forceful than the End Task button on the Task Manager. There is a different End Process button on the Task Manager that does use TerminateProcess().

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

TerminateProcess() is pretty reliable, but it doesn't form part of the C signals stack on Windows like kill -9. So for instance, if you're doing process control on Python, you need to use a special Windows-only API to access TerminateProcess().

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That is pretty insane. Opiates seem like they would make terrible chemical weapons.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

It's really racism. But if you want the legalistic explanation, here it is....

The United States started out with 13 states that were all ex-British territories on the Eastern seaboard of North America. There are now 50 states. Every state after the first 13 got its statehood by first being a territory, adopting a state Constitution at a constitutional convention, and then getting that Constitution approved by US Congress, and so being "admitted to the Union."

Under the Constitution, only states (and Washington DC) participate in the electoral college. The concept of non-state "territory" did not necessarily exist when that part was written, because there were only the original 13, and the Louisiana purchase wasn't done until later.

[Washington DC is a very special "district" that is not a state and not a territory.]

Puerto Rico has stayed at the territory stage since it was acquired in the Spanish-American war (started 1898). Why? Well, mostly racism. There have also been some popular votes in Puerto Rico, with very mixed results. In the currently evenly split political climate, getting any new state admitted is probably impossible (as it was before the civil war).

There's also some undercurrent that maybe the US is kinda uncomfortable holding on to these overseas islands (which are mostly connected to the same Spanish-American war). Philippines became an independent country. On the other hand, Hawaii got statehood in 1959 (but there was a whole racist history there of white colonization).

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The Constitution says that each state shall send electors to the electoral college. So Puerto Rico's status as an unorganized territory is a bit of a blocker.

The District of Columbia is also not a part of any state, as specified in the Constitution. However, DC explicitly got some electors in the 23rd amendment, so they can vote for President.

Really, the idea that the United States might have overseas territories that are not on track to statehood is itself an invention of the twentieth century. (Owing to the 1898 Spanish-American war, which caused the US to take over several parts of the ex-Spanish empire).

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Congress didn't take it away. The Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution doesn't give the President the power to veto just one part of a bill. The veto is an all or nothing power. (Which also how the UK royal assent worked at the time the US Constitution was written.)

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

Is it really just $250? That would be a pretty serious rebuke from the court.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 45 points 6 days ago

Musk has a security clearance for the SpaceX contracts, right? Did he file the proper forms reporting the foreign contacts?

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Lea and Perrins Worcestershire sauce checking in.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 272 points 2 weeks ago

This is a reminder to American service members:

Your oath of allegiance is to the United States, not to Donald Trump, Joe Biden, or Kamala Harris. You have a duty to obey lawful orders issued under the authority of the commander in chief. But it is your duty to disobey unlawful orders.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 140 points 2 months ago

Yeah. This sounds a lot like some PM type thinks they're gonna get rid of control panel, and they just don't know what all is actually in there.

And not to mention the custom control panel applets hanging around out there from who-knows-what vendors.

view more: next ›

mkwt

joined 1 year ago