226
submitted 1 week ago by antonim@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

According to him, the country’s economy “hit rock bottom” in the first quarter, which could lead to a crisis.

Zyuganov also suggested that the situation this fall could resemble the events of 1917, when the communists came to power.

Video with English subtitles available here: https://bsky.app/profile/antongerashchenko.bsky.social/post/3mk3d7tu6m22v

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 89 points 1 week ago

A communist coup in Moscow would be a bit on the nose, but I’d allow it

Ill pencil it in for early October

[-] Saapas@piefed.zip 30 points 1 week ago

Julian or Gregorian calendar? I want to get this right this time

Let's go with Julian, and if not enough people show up that day we'll go Full Greg.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] West_of_West@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

It's not like last time where the Russian empire is caught up in a war of attrition in Eastern Europe... oh wait.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] grte@lemmy.ca 65 points 1 week ago

"He emphasized that such a scenario must not be allowed to happen."

Controlled opposition.

[-] NateNate60@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

leader of a communist party warns against starting a communist revolution

mrw

[-] mech@feddit.org 22 points 1 week ago

Sounds to me more like a nudge nudge, wink wink sentence to avoid 25 years of prison in Siberia.

[-] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

MLs are always controlled opposition (and always have been), just look at how quickly they team up with capitalists to take out any real socialists.

[-] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago
[-] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Spain, Korea, Ukraine, the Soviets.

Any attempt at putting the workers in charge instead of the state is met with violence.

It's not controlled in the sense that capitalist control them, it's just controlled in the sense that the state requires private property & structurally state-capitalism is closer to liberal-capitalism, so you get less pushback from the cops, bureaucrats, bosses & other assorted middle managers that still get to live off labor of the workers.

[-] GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I figured you'd mention Spain, but I'm not sure what you're referring to in Korea. It was the Americans and South Koreans putting down workers uprisings there. As for Spain, the Anarchists weren't ever going to manage to beat the Nationalists.

What you're failing to understand is that in the context of imperialism, and the imperial boot, such decentralized anti-authoritarian revolutions are impossible. That's why none of them ever worked, while all the revolutions that succeeded had to take measures to ensure their survival. Look at Poland and Solidarnosc - an anti-authoritarian labour movement, ergo a good thing, right? Except the result wasn't liberation or socialism, but another loyal member of the imperial core, happy to help keep the boot of capital on the necks of the world proletariat.

If you guys ever manage to get off the ground and get a workers' federation going, I'll be the first to support you, and if you have to make a secret police to suppress the counterrevolutionaries, I'll keep my atodasos to a minimum. In the meanwhile, Marxism-Leninism is the only thing that's ever worked.

[-] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Man pick up a history book, you might learn something.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_People%27s_Association_in_Manchuria

As for Spain, the Anarchists weren’t ever going to manage to beat the Nationalists.

Lol, as if the betrayal by the USSR didn't decimate both the troops and their moral.

Except the result wasn’t liberation or socialism, but another loyal member of the imperial core, happy to help keep the boot of capital on the necks of the world proletariat.

Lol, it was just switching one imperialist capitalist boot for another. You have to be real stupid to consider the USSRs treatment of Eastern Europe as anything but imperialism.

Or it's treatment of workers as anything but capitalism, just capitalism managed by the state.

Marxism-Leninism is the only thing that’s ever worked.

🤣🤣🤣

Yeah China will be socialist any day now 🤣🤣🤣

Why isn't the USSR on any maps anymore?

How come Vietnam is liberalizing?

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Some good points, but your inappropriate "lols" and hysterically laughing emojis are tiresome, especially considering the topic

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] egyto@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
[-] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
[-] egyto@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Haha I'd never heard that take before. I'm curious about two things. 1) How do you define MLs? 2) What would real socialism entail? I'm guessing with those answers I should have a good idea what you're talking about.

[-] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
  1. Anyone who self-identifies as an ML, such as the part mentioned: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_the_Russian_Federation

  2. Workers being in control of the means of production, like actually not in some "the party represents the workers BS".

  • cooperatives & unions control job sites - real unions not yellow unions
  • workers control the economy via some real mechanism not 1 party elections with per-determined outcomes (Could be state-less - e.g Anarchy, could be state-full e.g some form of democratic socialism, will probably be a mix of both)
  • the people that work farms control them and are not forced to give back the farms to capitalists like the USSR did in Spain.
[-] egyto@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Hell yeah💪. I personally agree with how you define socialism. I'm a reddit refugee lol. They are all LMs and Stalinists over there.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] tal@lemmy.today 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Maybe, but I don't think that the conditions are nearly as bad as they were in 1917. They're obviously worse than they would have been had Russia not entered into the war, but the collapse in 1917 was due to urban food shortages. I don't mean "luxury X is unavailable", but that people couldn't get staple food to survive because of demands of the war.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/russias-february-revolution-was-led-women-march-180962218/

Like the French Revolution in 1789, a bread shortage in the capital precipitated unrest. After long shifts in the factories, female factory workers stood in bread lines alongside other women including domestic servants, housewives and soldiers’ widows. In these bread lines, news and rumors about planned rationing spread. When Saint Petersburg municipal authorities announced on March 4 that rationing would begin ten days later, there was widespread panic; bakeries were sacked, their windows broken and supplies stolen.

As he had throughout the previous months, Nicholas once again underestimated the extent of the unrest and again departed for military headquarters more than 400 miles away in Mogliev, which is now in Belarus, against the advice of his ministers. In the czar’s mind, leadership of the military took precedence during wartime, and he was concerned by the mass desertions occurring in the aftermath of munitions shortages and defeats at the hands of the Germans.

Though in past moments of revolutionary sentiment, the military had stood by its czar, by 1917, the armed force was demoralized and sympathetic to the demonstrators’ cause. The presence of large groups of women among the demonstrators made soldiers particularly reluctant to fire on the crowds. When the soldiers joined the demonstrators, as opposed to firing upon them, the end of the Romanov dynasty was near.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/ztyk87h/revision/5

There was a severe lack of food in Moscow and, in 1917, Petrograd only received half of the grain required to feed its citizens.

Now, okay. It's possible that standards for political support are different, that the bar has changed. But the public in Russia of 2026


though it may be in a worse state than Russia of 2020 due to resources consumed by the war


is also not experiencing the degree of deprivation of Russia of 1917.

[-] egyto@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

This is consistently true of most revolutions. Once a lot of people are staring at the possibility of starvation you hit critical mass on people with nothing to lose.

That is definitely true, but 21st century examples of revolution don't necessarily need a food shortage to begin (Maidan, Nepal, etc.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

It’s true. Looking back on revolutions, starvation is a common cause. What we haven’t seen is a relatively better off population revolt because their conditions got notably worse, from pretty good to pretty bad but not close to starvation.

[-] TimeNaan@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago

Isn't that party in Russia super pro-government? Essentially controlled oposition?

[-] Butterphinger@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago

New boss is the old boss.

"we won the revolution!

now get back to work!"

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

Oh, soviet union 2. Now with more soviets.

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Soviet Union 2: Electric Bogaloo.

[-] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago
[-] Janx@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Oops! All Commies

[-] P1nkman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

God damn, that was a good one!!

[-] rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

Warns of the Risk of a Revolution in Russia

Isn't it, like, his job to make this happen?

[-] egyto@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I'm pretty sure any real communists in Russia would be brutally repressed.

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

It'd be nice is Russia can take back itself from that dick-tater... Get rid of all of Putin's ilk, elect a decent person as president., power wash the stench away, peace talks with their neighbors, condemnation of the US Pedo Party. All that good stuff.

Highly doubt it will happen.

Damn, I want that for the US!

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Take it back to what, though? The 1990s? I guess that’d be an improvement. What they really need is progress. Is there any kind of progressive movement in Russia?

[-] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

There was, but it was all stomped in the very beginning.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

It would not be an improvement - do you have any idea how bad the 1990s were in Russia?

There's a reason that Putin has high support, and it's not all manufactured. It's that the Yeltsin shock therapy was really traumatic - largest peacetime drop in life expectancy in recorded history.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Simpsons did it

[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Oh well. As a certain ballistic missile submarine Captain once observed: A revolution every now and again, is a healthy thing.

[-] sinnsykfinbart@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Russian jokes still write themselves

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 week ago

In Soviet Russia, joke writes you!

[-] voaw@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

We’re gonna see that in the US before we see it in Russia. At least Russians have free education and free healthcare mandated by their constitution.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] homes@piefed.world 3 points 1 week ago
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I support it. I have no love for the early USSR, but I see its fall as a historical tragedy

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
226 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55855 readers
1730 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS