584

Donald Trump threatened on Sunday to withhold his signature from all bills until Congress passes a GOP-led voting bill that implements voter restrictions ahead of the November midterms.

“I, as President, will not sign other Bills until this is passed, AND NOT THE WATERED DOWN VERSION – GO FOR THE GOLD: MUST SHOW VOTER I.D. & PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP: NO MAIL-IN BALLOTS EXCEPT FOR MILITARY – ILLNESS, DISABILITY, TRAVEL,” Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social.

The bill, called the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, or SAVE America Act, requires individuals to show citizenship documents to register to vote and strict forms of photo ID to cast a ballot. If passed, the legislation would also administer criminal penalties for election officials who register anyone lacking the required documents.

As my colleague Ari Berman wrote in February, the bill would potentially block tens of millions of Americans from voting. Nine percent of American citizens, or approximately 21 million people, don’t have ready access to citizenship documents. The bill may impact millions of US citizens in other ways: tens of millions of women who took their partner’s last name, for example, may not have a birth certificate that matches their legal name could find it more difficult to register.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lonefighter@sh.itjust.works 111 points 1 month ago

For people who might not be in the US and don't understand why this is a bad idea in the US and proportionately hurts poor people, proof of citizenship is usually a passport. A passport costs $130. You need supporting documents like your birth certificate, SSN, and a drivers license/state ID to get it. For your first passport you usually have to make an appointment to go somewhere authorized like a library, post office, or courthouse to apply, and then they send the application off and it can take weeks to months to get back, depending how backed up the processing agency is (and I'm sure there will be artificial delays during voting years if this passes). Also, they are passing laws limiting where you can go to apply, so now libraries and the post office are losing the ability to process passport applications, so people will have to go to the county courthouse, which could be a long drive from where they live, especially if you live in a rural area. For people who don't drive, or only have one car that is shared with another working adult, or use public transportation that has a limited range (or just doesn't exist in most of the US), or are disabled and can't travel far, this can be a huge problem.

Also, all these places are only open during normal business hours, so you probably have to take time off work to go apply. Federal minimum wage is only $7.25/hr while the living wage is actually much higher (living wage for 1 adult living alone in a 1 bedroom apartment where I live was considered almost $23/hr in 2024), and if someone is making minimum wage or close to it they almost certainly aren't getting paid time off, so now they have to come up with $130 for the fee and lose time off work.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago

Also not that it matters anymore but the Supreme Court already ruled it unconstitutional a long time ago as it's a form of poll tax. Remember when Supreme Court decisions weren't just "whatever Trump wants today" and actually were based on the constitution? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

The current court regularly votes down Trump, tariffs are the most recent example.

The issue is the court is full of conservative assholes who care more about their feelings more than the law.

Don't get me wrong this is still a Trump caused problem, he appointed most of the new conservatives, but they still don't rubber stamp everything he does.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

It's curious why they would want to implement this because although it affects poor people, it would probably also disproportionately affect poor Republicans.

Many voters in states like Mississippi/Arkansas do not have passports because they are both poor and have no intention to travel internationally so don't bother with passports.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago

Because you won’t see it enforced in Mississippi or Arkansas, at least for white republicans. It will be selectively enforced to disenfranchise as needed.

[-] MerryJaneDoe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

it would probably also disproportionately affect poor Republicans

If MAGA thought that it would be a disadvantage to their voter base, they would not be pushing for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] andallthat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I am not from the US, so I'm also mentally comparing with what happens in my country. Here, the place where you're registered to vote has a list of all voter names and birth dates. You get there to vote, show a form of valid ID (driver's license is a valid one), you can vote and you're crossed off the list so you can't vote twice. You don't need to prove citizenship directly because if you don't have the right to vote, you're not on the list.

How does it work in the US? Citizenship aside, how do you prove that you are who you say you are and don't e.g. wear a hat and fake moustache and vote 3 times? Honest question, I'm not judging, I'm genuinely trying to understand how things work today in the US.

[-] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

That's a very hard question to answer because each state runs elections differently. In my state we just get our ballot by mail and you send that in with your signature. If you don't have an address there are polling places available, but it's been so long I'm not certain how they check ID.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gloog@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

For the most part - it works exactly like what you described. What kinds of ID are valid, and to some extent whether you are required to present one at all, depends on which state you live in.

The fake mustache double voter would have to know the details of another person who is already registered to vote (only some states allow same-day voter registration) and gambles on the other person not showing up to vote.

One big difference between the US and a lot of other democracies (when it comes to voting laws) is that the US doesn't have any form of universal national identification documents - pretty much everything is issued on a state-by-state basis, and with very few exceptions those state level IDs don't actually say anything about citizenship - noncitizen permanent residents are allowed to get driver's licenses.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

and if someone is making minimum wage or close to it they almost certainly aren’t getting paid time off, so now they have to come up with $130 for the fee and lose time off work.

A passport card is only $30 (plus the $10 or so dollars for the required photo), but everything else in your post is spot on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

While I don't think this should ever pass, I think a huge issue is we're too close to the election to be changing how voting works. People could vote in the primaries and then not have the documents to vote in the actual election. Something like this would need to be phased in over time, just think about how long Real IDs took to implement.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 75 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy."

[-] hildegarde 7 points 1 month ago

That's been their behavior continuously since the country's founding. This is nothing new.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago

Because more and more people hate his guts with the fury of a thousand women scorned.

And for good reason.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago

Schumer's gonna pass the SAVE act so he can pass Iran War funding, isn't he?

[-] hammertime@lemmy.org 35 points 1 month ago

Martial law in October. Get out or buy a gun

[-] myrmidex@belgae.social 16 points 1 month ago

The best time to get out was last year. The next best time is now.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago
[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I've been trying to float the idea of voters showing up to the polls armed. Everyone who has a firearm, carry it to vote. Not in a threatening manner, no waving them around, just... Everyone who has one is armed.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Polling stations are often in schools, and in my state it's illegal to be armed on school grounds.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

... I'm tired

[-] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 16 points 1 month ago

...our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.

-- Paul Weyrich, 1980

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Every time mail in ballots is brought up I mention that Florida has a successful mail in ballot system and they’ve been Republican for well over two decades.

[-] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 month ago

Trump uses mail in voting in Florida.

[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago
[-] Spitefire@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Salt Lake County's voting process is straight up fire, Sherrie Swensen was amazing. One of the only things I miss about Utah.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] orlyowl@piefed.ca 8 points 1 month ago

I've got a lot of worry about how much time he still has to get this passed, and about the viability of the midterms in general. I'm very worried he finds a way to suspend them, or actually gets this bill passed. (Or both)

[-] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

He will get this passed, or do it with some sort of executive order. Most left leaning states will ignore these things as they constitutionally have no power. And trump will use that at a reason to invalidate those states's votes entirely. This will cause violent protests. Trump will bring in the military and declare marshal law. We will then have a dictatorship with trump and his sons as dictators for generations.

[-] orlyowl@piefed.ca 3 points 1 month ago

I wish I thought you were being ridiculous.

[-] tover153@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The SAVE act as currently written has a religious exemption, boy do I have a church for you: The Church of Unconsented Likeness. Take the pledge today! https://substack.com/@tover153/p-188528157

[-] certified_expert@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I am from a country in which you normally take your ID document with you and cast your vote in person. All the millions of us do it, and the afternoon of that day we have the total count of votes. It is a very straightforward process.

I am not supporting Trump, really, but why would the implementation of this be a negative thing?

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

How do you get your ID document? Does it cost a lot to get? Does any official look at perfectly valid ID and say "I don't think that's real, so you don't get to vote"?

We have no national ID here, the closest thing to prove citizenship is a passport but people are not required to have one, and it is expensive. For most people, the only definitive proof of citizenship they have is their original birth certificate.

That is why here, in the US, when politicians push Voter ID laws it's mainly to disenfranchise poor people.

[-] certified_expert@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I once hard (here) that people in USA is kind of against having an ID document.

It ended up anyway giving them one of the crappiest IDs in any country: SSNs

to answer your questions: it is super cheap (~5 US dollars), fast, has many security systems, it is quickly verifyable agains government databases, it has a photo, your signature, and, if valid, nobody will question it.

It looks like a mini version of the plastic card in mdern pastports (of the size of a credit card)

The police can stop you and without probable cause ask you for your ID (and car/driving documents if in a car), check it against the national database, and give it back to you. You have to show it (required by law) and it is your responsibility (if you are over 18) to keep it with you. The intention is to catch people with pending charges or arrest orders and stuff. If you are not hiding from the law, it is a simple, civilized interaction that would take you 2~5 mins.

You know, the kind of things that you would expect from a 3rd world country, less developed than USA.

[-] fizzle@quokk.au 11 points 1 month ago

The police can stop you and without probable cause ask you for your ID

Here in Australia this would be considered a draconian overreach and an invasion of privacy.

You're not required to carry ID generally, and in my state you're not even required to carry your driver's license when driving. They might ask you some details so they can look you up, and they might ask you to bring your id to a police station within 48 hours, but honestly I've never had that happen.

You're describing the requirement to carry ID like its just a basic feature of modern society, but not all societies work that way.

In the SE Asian countries I've visited national IDs are more common because of porous borders. Checkpoints on highways are opportunities to exploit migrant workers, basically.

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

SSN are not an ID. Well they aren't meant to be an ID. It's just a number assigned to every citizen eligible for an account with the Social Security Administration. It just so happens that this is a convenient, unique number that every citizen has to use to get a job (employees pay into social security with each pay check) so it's been used to identify people by their numbers.

[-] 5too@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Well they aren’t meant to be an ID.

Mine still has that expressly printed on the back, "NOT A VALID FORM OF IDENTIFICATION" or something like that.

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 month ago

Because the hoops they make you jump through to get one are fucking ridiculous.

I'm a US citizen. I was a born here. I have a driver's license and a US-issued passport. Both of these are current and I had to prove citizenship to get the passport.

I'm still not able to legally vote in my state, though, because the law now requires that my driver's license, which doesn't expire for 4 years, have a Gold Star on it. No gold star, you can't vote.

I now have to make an appointment and drive to a licensing station in another city to get my Gold Star license in order to vote. I have to bring my still-valid passport, two pieces of mail, and a copy of my birth certificate. I can't even vote in a primary if I don't do that first.

I was born here, I haven't changed my name or moved, this is just the law now. They just really don't want people to be able to vote.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

And, it might cost up to $97, just for the real id upgrade.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

No gold star, you can't vote.

Wait, they won't take a passport? That's nuts. I can see them requiring a DL in addition to the passport, because your passport doesn't prove where you live, while a DL does. But not accepting the passport as proof of citizenship at all is bonkers.

Which backwards state is this?

[-] Throbbing_banjo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Iowa.

When I was a kid, our state essentially set the national standard for education and college readiness. While we were a deep purple state for a long time, the conservatives here were more of the balanced budget and family values variety.

The last 30ish years of education defunding and media balkanization has had a colossal impact on the rural population here. Outside of the cities, I barely recognize it as my home state anymore. People are hateful, fearful, distrustful of outsiders, and paranoid. They wear hate like a badge of honor.

I know this is happening in all of the rural states, but witnessing it firsthand has been pretty brutal.

[-] rozodru@piefed.world 8 points 1 month ago

as others have stated the US doesn't have what other countries would consider a national ID. they have a Drivers License and a Passport, that's it. I think some states might have a regular photo ID but I'm not sure it's been several years since I lived in the US. and then some people have like a military ID.

The problem is other than the Passport none of those are proof of citizenship. None citizens can get a drivers license, none citizens can serve in the military, none citizens can even get a social security number/card. So the only way to prove citizenship is like Passport or Birth Certificate. Not even sure how US Citizens who became citizens after landing would prove it and with how ICE is that would be an extremely risky thing to present/prove when going to vote.

So then you have the problem that A. Not everyone has/can afford a Passport and B. not everyone has a Birth Certificate or their name has changed on it or their gender has changed, etc.

Thus when you consider all these things you then realize that voting in the US only a fraction of the US population would be 100% eligible. and EVEN then they could deny you for whatever reason they deemed fit. And even just requiring a passport and birth certificate it's easy to then figure out WHO they're targeting based on demographics. Low income people aren't going to have a passport, like it or not a majority of Black Americans aren't going to have one, Trans people won't be eligible, Women who married likely won't be if they took their spouses last name, people who were adopted, all US citizens that became one after immigrating to the US, etc, etc, etc.

[-] certified_expert@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This country is so weird... It is so full of stuff that makes no sense. And the strange part (to me) is how natural this is for its inhabitants.

[-] Therefore@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

This is proof of citizenship. Not drivers license or proof of age. Passport, birth cert plus supporting, citizenship cert and supporting. Discrepancy between the latter two options resulting from change of name could disqualify voters.

"Nine percent of American citizens, or approximately 21 million people, don’t have ready access to citizenship documents."

Then you have my country where you enroll to vote, which requires id, lasts forever and you only have to update your address. On the day the volunteer looks up my given name on a ledger for my area, asks for my address and phone number, then explains how to write my vote.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

I'm okay with him not signing any bills.

[-] tyronenguyen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah govt doing absolutely nothing is pretty typical

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Bitch I’ve been saying this would happen for a fucking decade

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

s/desperate/determined

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
584 points (100.0% liked)

News

37466 readers
1918 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS