748
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FireWire400@lemmy.world 227 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's about time the electronics industry as a whole realises that innovation for the sake of innovation is rarely a good thing

[-] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 151 points 3 weeks ago

Look, we can’t have TVs that last 15 years anymore!

We need to keep people buying every year or two. Otherwise line not go up! Don’t you understand that this is about protecting The Economy?!

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 83 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's not even innovation, per say. It's just Big Number Go Up.

Nobody seems to want to make a TV that makes watching TV more pleasant. They just want to turn these things into giant bespoke advertising billboards in your living room.

Show me the TV manufacturer who includes an onboard ad blocker. That's some fucking innovation.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago

FireWire got killed too soon. 

[-] FireWire400@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Too right, brother

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 171 points 3 weeks ago

There’s no 8k content, and only recently do standard connectors support 8k at high refresh rates. 

There’s barely any actual 4K content you can consume. 

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 57 points 3 weeks ago

There’s barely any actual 4K content you can consume.

Honestly a little surprised the IMAX guys didn't start churning out 4k+ content given that they've been in the business forever.

But I guess "IMAX in your living room" isn't as sexy when the screen is 60" rather than 60'

[-] jqubed@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago

You don’t even need IMAX for 4K; ordinary 35mm film can normal scan to a nice 4K video. Films shot on the 65mm IMAX cameras would probably make good 8K content, but most of that was educational films, not what most people apparently want to watch all the time.

The digital IMAX projections were actually a step backwards in resolution.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Films shot on the 65mm IMAX cameras would probably make good 8K content, but most of that was educational films, not what most people apparently want to watch all the time.

Sure. But the cameras exist. You can use them for other stuff.

Hateful Eight was filmed in 70mm, and while it wasn't Tarantino's best work it certainly looked nice.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 weeks ago

They don't want IMAX in your living room, they want IMAX in the IMAX theater, where you pay a premium for their service.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There’s barely any actual 4K content you can consume

I feel like that's not true. But you've gotta try. If you're streaming it, chances are it's not really any better. 4K Bluray (or rips of them...) though? Yeah it's good. And since film actually has 8K+ resolution old movies can be rescanned into high resolution if the original film exists.

Supposedly Sony Pictures Core is one streaming service that can push nearly 4K Bluray bitrates... but you've gotta have really good internet. Like pulling 50-80GB in the span of a movie.

[-] kogasa@programming.dev 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You're probably aware of this since you mentioned bitrate, but a lot of 4K streaming services use bitrates that are too low to capture much more detail at 4K compared to a lower resolution. A lot of games will recommend/effectively require upscaling (DLSS/FSR/XeSS) to achieve good performance at 4K. All of this is still maybe better than 1440p, but it shows 4K is still kind of hard to make full use of.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 108 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[-] prole 21 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 107 points 3 weeks ago

Gaming was supposed to be one of the best drivers for 8K adoption.

Whu? Where 4k still struggles with GPU power? And for next to no benefit?

[-] olympicyes@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

What’s dumb is that 3D failed because of lack of resolution and brightness, and now we have more pixels than we can handle and screens so bright they can hurt to look at. PS3 had a couple games that showed different screens to two players wearing 3D glasses. I’d love to see full screen couch coop games with modern tech. 8K isn’t solving any problems.

[-] Rooster326@programming.dev 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

3D failed for the exact same reason VR is failing now. Nobody wants to wear headsets at home.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Introducing the new DLSS 9, were we upscale 720p to 8k. Looks better than native, pinky swear.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 93 points 3 weeks ago

I want a dumb tv with the price and and specs of a smart tv. Less is more

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 weeks ago

What you’re looking for are commercial screens. They’re a bit more expensive for a comparable panel, as they are intended for 24/7 use- but are about as dumb as they get nowadays.

[-] avg@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago

You would likely have to pay more since they aren't getting to sell your information.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 83 points 3 weeks ago

4k is enough, 60fps is enough, no smart or AI stuff is perfectly fine...

What about reducing the energy consumption? That's an innovation I want.

[-] HereIAm@lemmy.world 66 points 3 weeks ago

I hope you mean 60hz is enough for TVs. Because I certainly don't want that regression on my monitor 😄

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 weeks ago

OLED and 4k is where it's at.

[-] blitzen@lemmy.ca 56 points 3 weeks ago

Hell, OLED and high bitrate 1080 is probably good enough for me for the rest of my life.

[-] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 28 points 3 weeks ago

Shitrate 4k and 1080p are all you get on streaming platforms. Hard to get good quality bitrates outside of I guess bluray and piracy.

[-] blitzen@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

bluray and piracy

I feel like that was implied in my comment ;-)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 47 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck.

Now instead of each new generation of TVs being slightly higher in resolution some god damn business tech executive is going to focus on some god damn bullshit to try and change or add which is going be absolutely fucking ridiculous or pointless and annoying like AI television shit or TV gaming or fuck my life. Smart TVs are bad enough but they can't help themselves they need to change or add shit all the fucking time to "INNOVATE!!!" and show stockholder value.

Resolution was something easy and time consuming but we can't rely on that keeping them from fucking TV up any more.

[-] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 37 points 3 weeks ago

Theres a ton of other things I want my TV to do before more pixels.

Actual functional software would be nice, better tracking on high speed shots (in particular sweeping landscapes or reticles in video games) higher frame rates and variable frame rate content, make the actual using of the tv, things like changing inputs or channels faster, oh man so much more.

Anything but more pixels.

[-] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

Actual functional software would be nice

you do not want software on your TV.

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 weeks ago

I still probably watch 90% 1080p and 720p stuff lol. As long as the bitrate is good it still looks really good.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sefra1@lemmy.zip 31 points 3 weeks ago

Meanwhile I'm still at 1080p and most content I watch not even that.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 weeks ago

Right? I really don’t get it.

It’s the law of diminishing returns. When we went from 480p to 720p, it was a huge jump, something everyone noticed.

But the jump to 1080p was much less noticeable, to the point that people just thought its no different than 720p.

Now we have 4K, and most people stream, so it’s a bad bitrate ensuring it doesn’t look good all so the consumer feels like they are getting more cause 4K sounds cool.

I’m sooo glad 8K is not becoming a thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

All we want is a clear picture and no ads.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago

Did you say you want really clear ads? We got just that!

[-] art@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

For the majority of people a 1080p60 with a high bitrate and 10+ bit color space will look absolutely perfect. Some can pixel peep and tell, but more people still struggle seeing when the aspect ratio is wrong on their TV.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] towerful@programming.dev 24 points 3 weeks ago

Yeh, do: 60fps, 30 bit color... and I guess HDR?
Do things that people can actually appreciate.
And do them in the way that utilises the new tech. 60fps looks completely different from 24fps... Work with that, it's a new media format. Express your talent

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

TV manufacturers salivated at the idea of TV resolution, hoping desperately to turn the TV market into something like the PC market, in that you have to upgrade every 5ish years to stay on top of technology and use the latest stuff to artificially increase sales beyond what their already abysmal build qualities provide them.

I'm glad the plan is failing spectacularly.

Hopefully this forces them to think more about quality and start focusing on TVs that actually last now... You know, like we used to have 30 years ago.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] magic_smoke 18 points 2 weeks ago

That's because the answer isn't higher resolutions, it was legally enforcing h.265 to be open source. Now the solution is AV1, but video codecs shouldn't be locked down like that.

To act like that was ever in favor of "protecting the sciences" is a fucking joke.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago

Plot twist: because all we need is 16K.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago

4k is a little much for me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Even if it was, the streamings everyone's using crush down the bitrate so bad it'd barely look better than 4k anyway.

[-] deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 3 weeks ago

High bitrate 1080p > mid/low bitrate 4k and 8k.

[-] xSikes@feddit.online 17 points 3 weeks ago

Working in entertainment and broadcasting, you learn barely half of Americans have a 4K tv and it’s under half worldwide. Marketing makes you think that “everyone is doing it”

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
748 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

81653 readers
4074 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS