748
The TV industry finally concedes that the future may not be in 8K
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
748 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
81653 readers
3946 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Whu? Where 4k still struggles with GPU power? And for next to no benefit?
What’s dumb is that 3D failed because of lack of resolution and brightness, and now we have more pixels than we can handle and screens so bright they can hurt to look at. PS3 had a couple games that showed different screens to two players wearing 3D glasses. I’d love to see full screen couch coop games with modern tech. 8K isn’t solving any problems.
3D failed for the exact same reason VR is failing now. Nobody wants to wear headsets at home.
Or anywhere, really. AR/XR glasses are a big improvement, but can still be clunky.
Or bring on the neural shunt. Not so fast, Elon. It's not for your purposes. It's for mine. And I can't see who I could trust with direct connections to my brain... But once I plugged in, I love Amazon, and you should subscribe!
But VR can do a lot of cool things, 3d... not so much.
Screen dimming is technically possible over HDMI/Displayport no idea why its not properly supported and integrated into monitors, graphics drivers, windows and Linux. KDE shows dimming for monitors sometimes? Don't know if that is software or real hardware dimming though.
It’s real hardware dimming.
Nice thought so but wasn't sure.
I’m talking about brightness in context of 3d. KDE uses DDE with USB connected monitors which is the same thing as using a button to lower brightness.
Introducing the new DLSS 9, were we upscale 720p to 8k. Looks better than native, pinky swear.
I dunno. Oxygen Not Included looks crisp on a 4K monitor. And it makes my job easier, being able to have an absolute tonne of code on-screen and readable. I reckon I could probably use an 8K monitor for those things.
Yeah, I generally have FSR running on any 3D game made in about the last decade - even if I can run it at 4K at a reasonable framerate, my computer fans start to sound like a hoover and the whole room starts warming up. But upscaling seems a better solution than having separate monitors for work and play.
Pretty sure my GPU could run 4k Rimworld, just play good games instead of AAA games.
But we are talking TV. RPG with a controller is more suitable here. And there are some great RPG games.
Yeah, can't run it, Internet too slow to steam it
8k would be cool to display lots of windows at the same time but fairly useless for gaming.
Everything above 1440p isn't offering any display space. I have a 4K monitor but 150% DPI is needed to make things big enough to work with.
I'm using a 5k by 1200 monitor and it's awesome with Kde. I suppose it would be equally great with other interfaces.
With 100% DPI?
Sure, native resolution, no zoom, it's fine.
Not so on my laptop with an insane resolution of like 2k by 3k on a 13 or 14 inch screen though.
What do you mean 2k by 3k? And 5k by 1200? 4K is a resolution of 3840 × 2160. 1440p is normally 2560 × 1440.
My 4K monitor ( 3840 × 2160) is 27 inches and with 100% DPI is not usable. Resolution is 4K only bigger UI. (150%, which is as if I had 1440p).
The 5k monitor is a 49 inch model from MSI. The laptop is a compact model from Lenovo, a Yoga Pro something or other. Not sure what its resolution is (3k something by 2k something from what I remember), just that it's needlessly high for its screen size, requiring UI scaling.
I wouldn't say a 49 inch panel a typical monitor though. My TV is 49 inches lmao.
True, it's not typical. It's comfortable though.
Depends on the usecase (how far away your eyes are) and how big the display is (again, how far away). TV is far away, has ideally 50 to 70" but low dpi. Computer display is good around 30 to 40" (would need to move your head otherwise, wasted money), maxes out at around 4k. Notebook 10 to 20", high dpi, 2k is good enough. While a phone has very high dpi, but 5 to 7" and around 1k resolution.