649
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 110 points 4 months ago

This reeks of the “noble savage” stereotype. I would be willing to bet 80% of biodiversity being in native lands has more to do with how brutally they’ve been repressed than how “in tune” with the environment they are.

They’re people too, and I see little reason to believe they wouldn’t fall to the same human flaws as the rest of us if given the chance.

[-] dumples@piefed.social 30 points 4 months ago

Except the fact we have lots of evidence that native population (which also includes pre-industrial European culture) built sustainable systems which includes altering the environment. Throughout North America there tons of evidence of the use of fire was used. The classic prairie environment of the Oak Savana is only possible through burns and supports a large buffalo population. There's tons of evidence of strategic cultivation of trees and other plants within the Amazon rainforest that allow people to get food and medicine close by that to the untrained eye looks identical to the rest of the forest.

That being said some of those same people them destroy the same forest via slash and burn agriculture in order to earn a living for cash crops and more traditional agriculture. So profits is a main driver

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 months ago

So profits is a main driver

This is exactly what I’m getting at. If these groups of humans were placed in the same scenarios that Europeans or other westerners were placed in, would they not be susceptible to the same greed that motivated them?

I do not deny that many native societies appear to live in more harmony with the environment than your average westerner. There is certainly a lot to learn there, and I believe we would do better if we emulated some of those characteristics. However, I think that we’re all susceptible to the same flaws, as we are all human.

Ultimately what I’m saying is I don’t think that natives have some superpower where they have figured out how to escape the flaws that have plagued humanity for thousands of years.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] architect@thelemmy.club 13 points 4 months ago

95% of people can sing kumbaya in their little eco friendly circle jerk but if that 5% is over it and ready to fight over that belief the 95% better buck the fuck up and rise to the obvious existential threat in front of their fucking face or else they lose.

Oh look, that’s what happened.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shawn1122@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Many indigineous peoples uphold sustainability as crucial to their culture.

It is actually a common logical failing of Western thinking to assume that everyone sees the world and interacts with it the same way (like them). An unfortunate legacy of Eurocentrism during the colonial era.

The noble savage archetype itself came from Western schools of thought, and though it's now accepted as overly reductive, that doesn't mean that many Indigineous cultures do not live lives closer to nature and therefore put more thought into their ecological impact.

Indigineous cultures are layered and sophisticated. Some argue that principles of egalitarianism and self governance were introduced to englightenment thinkers through contact with Indigineous peoples in the Americas. Unfortunately a Eurocentric world view meant that crediting non European cultures for anything over most of the past 500 years has been discouraged.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Many indigineous peoples uphold sustainability as crucial to their culture.

Many of every other nation, race, culture and creed do too.

It is actually a common logical failing of Western thinking to assume that everyone sees the world and interacts with it the same way (like them).

See how the sentence describes the crime you just committed? Philosopher, heal thyself.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 103 points 4 months ago

Sounds like shrinking the population would solve the problem, as long as it's a very specific 10% that was shrunk.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 58 points 4 months ago

Just a little off the top.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 44 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Ecofascism isn't a real ideology I don't know why people keep insisting it is. Almost seems like a deliberate psy-op to create divisions among environmentalists. But more likely people are just stupid and afraid and angry.

[-] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 23 points 4 months ago

What do you mean? It certainly is. It has been, for example, an influence in several right extreme terror attacks (notably the Christchurch, NZ mass shooting in 2019 comes to mind, where the murderer explicitly described himself as such in his manifesto). Not to mention that crunchy, back-to-the land ideas are a really important part of contemporary far right propaganda.

I'd also argue that this doesn't really sow division amongst environmentalists; just because it has 'eco' in the name doesn't mean these people actually care about the environment, it's all aesthetics.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes, surprised at these comments considering how much this stuff is some of the current hot topics in research.

Sorted by date:

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&scisbd=1&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=ecofascism

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22indigenous+stewardship%22&scisbd=1

Biodiversity is one of my areas, chat.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 10 points 4 months ago

Your post really called out all the "smart" people who have decided on a form of fascism to appeal to their idea of how to fix the world.

They won't change their mind cause they want less people and they want to think it fixes stuff without having to read a study about it. They liked it during covid when there were less people to interact with I think and had comfort in wealth to not have to suffer the consequences and now just aim for it.

Good post. Love the resources.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 32 points 4 months ago

I distinctly remember being taught in 2002 in upstate New York that humans were outside of the ecosystem and not bound by the same rules and things as animals were. The teacher said that’s what made us so special.

What a fucking crime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wander@sh.itjust.works 30 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I watched a documentary in New Zealand about fish stocks. It was talking about how the fish around New Zealand are overfished and numbers are low. Had experts talking about issues with boats and how they need no fishing areas. They had Maori on there talking about how much abundance of fish there was before the white people came. They talked about how in tune the Maori were with the land and had ways to manage stock.

The documentary finished saying the issue is still ongoing and not enough has been done. Didn't really go into why.

Well I looked it up after the majority of fishing companies are owned by the Maori and the reason the scientifically justified areas were not set as a sanctuary was because the Maori didnt agree and wanted to do things there own way that would allow them to fish at levels higher than what the science was saying is possible. On this matter New Zealand cared more about what Maori incorrectly believed over what the scientific evidence was saying to them.

People need to get off their high horse. People suck all over the world. Yea shock the people that live in mountains which remain untouched because it is shit farmland is going to have the most nature. But go to other countries and you see it's the same, well worse than white countries. Places like UK has had protected land for hundreds of years. They set up protected land in the new places they went. Areas they left like Malaysia and India are full of rubbish and monoculture. They didn't get better. Go to Indonesia and look at their beautiful islands. The tour guide said to us "look no littering sign. Only in Indonesian. Westerners don't litter but the locals do".

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 11 points 4 months ago

no littering sign. Only in Indonesian

Not really related, but in Japan, I came across a monolingual sign that said: "In Japanese culture, it is considered impolite to piss in public".

Westerners don’t litter but the locals do

Have you not seen how westerners behave on vacation? Maybe you got lucky, but there's a reason the tourist part of nearly every city has the most litter

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 28 points 4 months ago

I'm tired of people pretending they are smart and problem solving by by mass murdering most humans on the planet and stopping procreation.

You don't solve a jigsaw puzzle by putting 10 pieces together and burning the rest so you dont have to deal with them.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 months ago

Absoluetely no one is promoting this. I hear this bullshit argument every time degrowth comes up, but this has NOTHING to do with degrowth and is a bad faith argument full of too many fallacies to mention.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 27 points 4 months ago

Your meme has too many words and the four block structure makes no sense.

[-] Soulg@ani.social 24 points 4 months ago
[-] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 4 months ago

It’s actually “TL;DR rich people bad” but sure, pop off I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 8 points 4 months ago

Dude, there is a memes that are mutliple paragraphs that some people can recite by heart.

Just mention eliter snipers or vaporeon and watch the people go.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There is a point burried in there that is drowned out by all the fallacious added baggage. Its disingenuous bullshit.

Indigenous Chinese or Indians or Nigerians are not protectors of the earth, just like every other industrial nation. The picture meant to frame "Indigenous" as what Canada calls the indigenous First Nations peoples. It's relying on the racist trope of the noble savage, forgetting that First Nations aren't against industrializing their lands, as long as they are included as partner beneficiaries and they don't maximize returns via egregious environmental destruction on their lands. They also generally want industrialization and trade including water treatment, sanitation and all the other goodies like internet, tv, playstations and the like.

It also targets "capitalist" without looking at the eco-horrors of every other 'ism on earth. Go have a cool tall glass of Ganges, Nile or Yellow river water and tell me how refreshing it is.

This is a shitpost carefully designed to be a lopsided attack.

[-] Nangijala@feddit.dk 22 points 4 months ago

I'm not sure this person is aware what indigenous means. Unless, of course this meme is a 100% America-centric meme and largely ignores the entire rest of the world.

Also pretty funny that "eco fascism" is placed underneath what I assume are native Americans.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 11 points 4 months ago

Switch the bottom panels in your head. They're not meant to be associated with the up row. Oop poor design choice.

[-] Nangijala@feddit.dk 13 points 4 months ago

I get the intent, but I still think it's funny that you placed eco fascist underneath the group the native Americans.

Btw, I still don't think you know what indigenous means.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anivia@feddit.org 14 points 4 months ago

Although I dont disagree, the argument doesn't make sense. Do you think our worlds population would be the same if we all lived like indigenous people?

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 12 points 4 months ago

Carbon emissions are not the only problem. I really doubt the world's reaches 10% also produce half of the sewage and plastic or that most of the land is turned into farms to feed them. It's nice that indigenous people living in forest don't destroy it but you can't have 8 billion people living in forests. Cities and highways are not part of the ecosystem.

[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 11 points 4 months ago

Thanks for the good vibes, they'd also love this over on LeftyMemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 9 points 4 months ago

Feel free to crosspost!

[-] JamBandFan1996@lemmy.ml 10 points 4 months ago

Sure, if you all want to live like it's 1750 again humans are not a problem. We both know you don't want to do that so stop acting like the modern lifestyle is sustainable if the rich just polluted less. It's not that simple, they pollute that much because they own the facilities that support our lifestyle

[-] Dholi@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 months ago

they pollute that much because they own the facilities that support our lifestyle

I didn't know their private jets, yachts, and companies that lobby for lax environment rules support my lifestyle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] plyth@feddit.org 10 points 4 months ago

Who is reading this without being part of the 10%?

[-] relianceschool@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

According to this study, an income of $38,000/year puts you in the top 10% of carbon emitters. This study puts it at €42,980, or about $50K USD. That's a little higher than the median income in N. America, Europe, and Australia.

That said, carbon emissions are just one way humans impact the environment; other facets are far less variable (we all produce about the same amount of human waste per day, for example).

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] arararagi@ani.social 10 points 4 months ago

Nihilists should lead by example and remove themselves first.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 10 points 4 months ago

amazon, many rainforests(both amazon and mega-biodiversity of indonesia, south eas asia) is being decimated and untold species both undiscovered and rares are fast disappearing.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

No, sorry, I stand by the "humans are a virus" side. A small minority aren't, but most are, myself included.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 4 months ago

Indigenous people protecting the environment from what?

[-] Dholi@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Are Indigenous populations deforesting the Amazon? Are they forcing oil pipeline projects that cause massive oil spills that pollute rivers and lakes for thousands of years? Do they force mining projects that pollute earth for thousands of years? Did they invent forever chemicals that have now pollute every single square inch of earth? No, they live sustainably.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] halvar@lemy.lol 9 points 4 months ago

Saying stuff like humans are the virus isn't fascism it's just simply stupid/edgy. Sure you could say someone like that is a useful idiot to fascists but that's like saying everyone who drinks gasoline from the cars parked on the street is furthering the agenda of some solar panel manufacturing company. Both are inconsequential enough for me not to give a shit.

[-] architect@thelemmy.club 9 points 4 months ago

We aren’t saying that brown people are above tech and modernities and that’s why they don’t have them… are we? Surely not.

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Nope, check out the TEK links and the First Nations link. A lot of these programs are led by indigenous groups.

https://www.unep-wcmc.org/en/news/championing-indigenous-peoples-stewardship-of-biodiversity

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 8 points 4 months ago

It's not wrong to say that population is the driving problem. Do you think indigenous people ever coexisted with their ecosystem at the population density we're at now?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
649 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

20266 readers
978 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS