369
submitted 1 day ago by hikep@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 116 points 1 day ago

Lol there's no way I'd continue working. No pay? Guess the planes stay grounded. Tough titties.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

But but ... Ronald Regan! Lol

[-] Truscape 86 points 1 day ago

When the ATC union attempted to strike under Reagan, he fired them all in retribution and removed their ability to collect their benefits from their service.

I would imagine this admin would do even shittier things to these people who work in conditions they don't deserve (Why the fuck is their budget not mandatory spending, Congress? Why have their facilities not have renovations approved for fucking decades?).

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 54 points 1 day ago

Who's he going to replace them with? There is already s massive shortage of ATCs with most airports below FAA guidelines prior to the shutdown.

I think when Reagan fired all the ATCs, they were temporarily replaced with military trained ones until they could hire and train replacements. But that was a time when there was significantly less air travel and less ATCs than we have and need now.

So maybe they might have the military take over some positions? There's no way they could fill every single airport and I doubt that they even have the same training and skill set as commercial ATCs.

But having a military take over of airports is the kind of dictator move that probably makes someone like trump salivate.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago

But that was a time when there was significantly less air travel and less ATCs than we have and need now.

This actually isn't true, at least the "have" part.

There were ~14k ATC controllers employed before the Reagan strike. There are currently ~10,600 controllers. The required staffing level to fully staff all 313 facilities is ~14,600.

Interesting those numbers have largely not changed in 40 years. Honestly I was guessing that we needed way more ATCs since the strike because air traffic has increased so much since then. Do you happen to know why the need for ATCs hasn't really changed?

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 22 hours ago

there apparently is less now, 4000 down from before.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

GPS, modern navigation and logistics technology is the biggest reason.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago

they cant since the military also needs thier own ATCs to manage thier airfields and bases.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

The military is also not currently being paid.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

But at least they can rely on the billionaires to throw them a bone, since they are the ones benefiting most from this arrangement. There was one just the other day that dropped $130 million just to keep the troops out of the red. I don't know if there are any billionaires with a soft spot for ATCs but i suppose we'll find out soon enough!

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 22 hours ago

100$/soldier isnt exactly going to keep them out of the red. its just a bribe to trump.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

That money'll go a lot farther if it's only covering ~10,000 ATCs rather than ~1,000,000 service members.

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Well, then i guess we might just see another billionaire bailout. This is the stupidest fucking timeline

[-] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I mean, they should be the ones funding this stuff all the time (it should just be involuntary on their part)

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Fully agreed. The billions they're hoarding is money that should be funding all the things the taxpayers need--the basics like food/shelter/healthcare... Things that countries with much smaller GDPs don't have nearly as much difficulty figuring out.

I also think it's worth noting that the states receiving the most SNAP benefits include New York, California, and Texas--it's very possible Trump is doing this especially because it stands to affect 2 states he's not entirely thrilled with. Across the country, 42 million people have been relying on the SNAP benefits they were receiving, which average approx $190/mo per person. Where are the billionaires lining up to help these folks in need?

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 22 hours ago

Texas is thier sacrificial lamb and collateral damage they are willing to do.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

nobody since, you cant exactly hire scabs on the fly, plus it take a couple years to train a atc, and source them from a program to do it. its a long grueling process, plus its super competitive, which is a natural gatekeeping for the ATC job. probably dont want to lower physical/medical standards to just ensure more would apply either.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That was a problem in Reagan's time too. It didn't stop him firing them all. Air traffic control in the USA is still suffering the after effects of Reagan's action, as the generation that trained up to replace the workers he fired is all retiring at the same time.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 day ago

They failed because the other unions didn't stand in solidarity. If every union in the country retaliated against Reagan they could have forced him to rehire. They kept their heads down to protect themselves instead of retaliation, which only accelerated the decline of unions.

Despite the decline it's still a viable strategy. If the air traffic controllers get fired, everything gets shut down. It's the only way.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

It’s not a strike if you’re not getting paid in the first place.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

At that point it's a slave rebellion.

[-] dditty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

Yes if I were an ATC I would definitely be worried about that. It just sucks because if the ATCs did strike it would actually significantly impact the 1%, probably moreso than almost any other labor strike could

[-] PeacefulForest@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

I wouldn’t be too worried, bottom line is I feed my family, everything else can fuck off

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

S.24 - Government Employee Fair Treatment Act of 2019

Sponsored by a Senator from MD, signed into law by Trump. Vote was 411-7 with the only seven Nays coming from Republicans. Trump either agreed with it at the time or knew he couldn't veto it as it has more than 2/3 support and would override his veto right after.

Legally they all will get paid, and acrue paid leave as normal during a government shutdown. The fact that the money isn't set aside and able to be paid for say up to a year in case of said shutdown is kind of a disgrace. Government shutdowns like this didn't happen until "recent history" (Ronald Reagan).

So congress was definitely behind the ball, but likely never knew they'd have to face a domestic threat like this until now. (Or presumably when Trump won president the first time and they decided to write the bill to mitigate damages)

[-] Red_October@piefed.world 13 points 1 day ago

Legally they all will get paid, and acrue paid leave as normal during a government shutdown.

And as we all know, this administration is all about obeying the law.

Yeah, that's why I had to put the word legally in there. Crazy times

[-] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago

Government shutdowns were largely developed by Newt Gingrich. It's a choice to hold the government hostage. Obviously Congress won't mitigate the damage, they could easily choose to not to do it in the first place.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 22 hours ago

hes also the one that developed to never work with the otherside, unless gop concessions are met.

[-] meathorse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Shutting down altogether is the best option for ATC but for the next best thing, I'd want to start redirecting planes to other airports - I can't imagine the logistics would work but anyway... One in ten flights gets a "surprise" location. If all other airports did the same thing. Each week it increases, 2/10, 3/10 etc until no one gets their destination.

[-] EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works 80 points 1 day ago

I find it mad that in the absence of an agreement people aren't just paid at the existing rate

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 1 day ago

They history are.

But Trump is threatening to not pay the back pay and only pay those who pledge allegiance to him.

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is inaccurate.

Trump is threatening no back pay for furloughed employees. Employees coming in to work still will recieve back pay for hours worked.

However, Trump can threaten all he wants, but it was codified into law during his last administration that all furloughed federal workers are garunteed back pay. Now Congress would have to change that law when passing the budget to make Trump's threats come true. That would be a very bad vote for many Republicans, and a non-starter for the Democrats.

So short of breaking the law, it's just the incoherent ramblings of our senile president. He still might try it though

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

"Short of breaking the law" - you are aware we are talking about Trump here. Adherence to the law is not among his strong points.

[-] arrow74@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Hence the "he still might try though" part of the comment

[-] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago

They mean to continue operating the agencies at the previous budget level, until a new one is set.

The current system makes it too easy for the side trying to tear everything down.

[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

this is what backpay means

[-] EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

That's not what I meant. Backpay is all well and good but no help if you have rent to pay or food to buy and you haven't been paid.

[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah I know, I have family who are furloughed right now and have been in government long enough for this to be a regular enough occurrence for them

[-] SARGE@startrek.website 39 points 1 day ago

There are three things you don't mess with

Mother nature

Mother in laws

And my mother fucking money

No pay, no work.

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
369 points (100.0% liked)

News

32970 readers
2522 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS