429
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

That would be great news, if we were ever going to have elections again.

Nepal has taught the world that you don't need your government to have an election.

[-] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

RATINGS DON'T MATTER ANYMORE. Stop posting this shit.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

I feel bad for the citizens that voted against this. But every protest sitter outer, and person that did vote for this can't say shit.

It's an attempt to keep up morale from people that think we'll get midterms

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 36 points 2 days ago

That's cool that some people are (finally) figuring out what a total clown Orange Jesus is, but....did Hitler's poll numbers really mattered after he seized power?

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

So? He doesn't care

[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Pretty sure the election was stolen and all those swing states anyway. It’s statistically improbable that he won all seven swing states. Not to mention the election tampering, Starlink, etc.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Donald Trump has cheated at literally EVERYTHING in his life: he cheated on every wife, he cheats at golf and wins every tournament at all of his courses, he cheats on his taxes, he uses bankruptcy as a money laundering strategy, etc. He cheats in every aspect of his life, but the Democrats want us to believe that he won "fair & square," and millions of people in the swing states voted straight Democratic tickets, except with Trump at the top. They've never produced a single one of these Democratic Trump voters, which only exist in the swing states, apparently.

According to Democratic leadership, the one election that he absolutely HAD to win, in order to avoid spending the rest of his life in prison, is the ONLY time that he played it "fair & square," and didn't cheat. Does that sound the Trump we've all come to know?

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Statistically im probable?

[-] EdgeOfDistraction@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yes thanks lol

[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Makes sense. He looks like he's been underwater himself

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

The cabal playing him like a fiddle approve.

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 140 points 3 days ago

The man tried to overthrow the legitimate government of the USA and Americans still elected him into office. Approval rating doesn't mean shit.

[-] jaykrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

89 million Americans didn't vote in 2024, roughly 36% of all eligible voters, over 1/3rd.

[-] saimen@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago

Not voting is equal to voting for the winner.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

... so you're saying he's extremely popular?

[-] Kirp123@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Which just means they stood there and watched as 1/3rd elected him into office. Just because they didn't vote doesn't mean they aren't responsible. It's like three people sitting in a train, one trying to keep it on the tracks, one trying to steer it off the tracks and the third guy just watching like he's not on the same train as the other two.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Elections happen every 2 years. Approval polls are taken every 2 weeks. Things change.

[-] bamboo 32 points 3 days ago

And the voters have an even shorter term memory. Trending downward is nice, but I doubt the shit we're dealing with now will be in most people's mind when they vote in 2026 and 2028.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If in March he announces an end to the tariffs and prices have a sudden relief, then the GOP can sail in on the realization of lower prices.

It's easier to make things better when you deliberately make them worse first. There's the lovely strategic thing of the non-election year.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

We'll probably have worse things on our mind by then...

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

No shit. He probably will have nuked San Francisco or something by then.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

Does not matter when votes won't happen...

They'll surely find an excuse.

[-] potoo22@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

People have the memory of a goldfish. In 2028, the democratic candidate is going to have some obscure flaw that'll be pushed to every media station and social network that caters to the party that punishes opponents, and most Americans will forget the past 4 years and focus on this one flaw.

[-] pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 days ago

“Yes Hitler McRacismCEO is a fascist, but Steve NotANazi clears his throat weird. Both sides are the same. Don't vote.”

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

The 2028 nominee will be Liz Cheney or something.

[-] saruwatarikooji@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's what all the labeling of groups as terrorists is for, along with the troop deployment to cities. They are going to try to effectively declare war on terrorism in various cities and states and use that war to suspend elections.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 121 points 3 days ago

great, he is not planning on their being another election so it really doesn't matter.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

I recently started following a guy on YouTube who's answer to the doubt over whether we'll be able to vote again is, "I'm not asking. I'm voting". I've decided to adopt that mentality and I encourage others to do the same.

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 13 points 2 days ago

This is the correct response. All that matters is what you intend to do.

You don’t get points for correctly predicting defeat, calling out other’s inaction, or lamenting how unfair the fight is.

Courage is not the absence of fear, but only cowardice tries to spread it among comrades in the midst of the fight.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

But he had all those "Trump 2028" hats. Surely that means he plans to run again. He wouldn't just troll people for the sadistic glee, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Too late, thanks to the dumbfuck voting population.

[-] druid74@reddthat.com 26 points 2 days ago

If he is still alive in 2028, there is no chance he allows fair and free elections, so this does not matter at all.

[-] frustrated@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I dont know why this is relevant. Either he prevented from running, in which case this doesnt matter; OR he IS running in violation of the law, in which case this doesnt batter because if he is willing to break an established precent and law then he would not leave his third term open to chance by having free or fair elections.

[-] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

... or they just don't have elections.

He's already spoken about it. If there's a "war" they don't need elections.

The worst part is that there’s no actual law about that anywhere. He’s looking at Ukraine’s suspended elections, but that was only possible because Ukraine’s constitution specifically states that elections can be suspended during war. The US constitution doesn’t have any such clause. But I’m sure he’ll try anyways, and the current SCOTUS will let him.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Maybe seeing the winds change can help the chickenshit congress find their spine and make the 25th ammendment happen?

[-] sadness_nexus@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Does it matter? Kamala was supposed to have a slam dunk victory in the last presidential election. Every single post made on Reddit and Lemmy and Mastodon and everything said Trump's numbers are "lowest they've ever been" and what not. In the end, Trump won and it wasn't even close. It doesn't matter what the polls say. In the end, hatred and stupidity won in the last election and who knows, it might work again.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Approval rating doesn't matter if we never get to vote again and even if we do, he's a lame duck anyway.

[-] Catma@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

I wish I had any confidence polls meant anything to him or the GOP.

Trump is saying we are "at war" eith our own cities, cartels, and probably Venezuala sooner or later. And if we are "at war" no way to have elections right guys? I mean Ukraine did it so he can too.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 days ago

There's probably not a single president that cared about approval ratings in their second term. Regardless of what they may think about a particular candidate at this point between elections, they will vote according to their needs on election Day

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago

Trump definitely cares. He thrives on that kind of shit.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

He doesn't care about approval ratings, those are measurements or projections of future acceptance. He cares about right now and keeping his name in the media, good or bad. Anytime there is a lull in his name circulating he will make the most outrageous claim or statement so media refocuses on him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 24 points 3 days ago

Yeah well fuck those states specifically, I hope they lose everything.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago

Hey man, swing states are at least trying. Go yell at Ohio or Florida. They used to be swing states and gave up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 days ago

At least those states are getting what they voted for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2025
429 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25949 readers
2607 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS