897
So many solutions (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 90 points 8 months ago

Unmute this meme immediately!

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 48 points 8 months ago
[-] sexybenfranklin@ttrpg.network 15 points 8 months ago

Yeah... Like, I agree a lot of the liberal "resistance" is useless but also every time I see a leftist online advocating for revolution, I'm wondering when they're gonna kick it off.

[-] BJ_and_the_bear@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

It ain’t gonna happen until a critical mass of the population has nothing left to lose. As it stands now, revolution sounds great to me, but getting arrested or killed leaves my family impoverished and possibly homeless. Being a cog in the machine is a preferable fate

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 43 points 8 months ago
[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 months ago

But it’s not helpful to doom about these things.

[-] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 52 points 8 months ago

I dunno, acknowledging the problems seems like a good start

[-] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Lemmy has been chock-full of these memes critical of the dems since the election. How much more of this "good start" is needed before people move on to the next step (whatever it might be)?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

You're right. Everything's ok.

/s

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

But they are. Think what the message is implying here. Don't do the things that are actually important to actually pull votes to your side. There's no point since it's all rigged. This post is propaganda.

This post is like some political consultant group found things that could sway an election and turn tides and then inverted it to imply those things are just silly

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 8 points 8 months ago

This post is propaganda.

So is this reply. Also being propaganda is funny in this case since nothing here says anything about not voting, just that currently the two party system has broken down and no longer feels like democracy (due to how it is not). In this case who would the propaganda be for? The democrats? Not likely, they are not helped here. The republicans? Don't think they care, many don't plan on having fair elections again. Big molotov?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] eugenia@lemmy.ml 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sorry to break it to you but the blame lies with the American people. In Europe, when something like this happens, everyone's on the streets and there are strikes everywhere. And the protests almost always turn violent. And we're talking about large demonstrations of millions, not a few hundred/thousands as in the US. In the US, the demonstrations kinda feel like a spectacle, a show that you join for a couple of hours. In Europe it means business. I'm also American, but I'm currently in Greece. I've seen the differences with my own eyes. The public needs to show force, or it has no teeth. I'm not advocating for violence, I'm advocating for teeth.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately even Europe is going this way. The right have figured out how to spam nonsense on social media and turn enough people. And how to control media in general, just be on tv and radio as much as possible complaining about everything even if it doesn’t exist and offer up baseless solutions to solve every problem you’ve ever head.

See Farage.

[-] cobysev@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I think one of the big concerns is that Trump is looking for any excuse to deploy the military against our own citizens. If he can start something violent in the streets, it justifies declaring martial law and taking over Democrat-run states. But in this digital age, everyone has cameras on their phones, so he needs the citizens to start shit first. He's not brave enough yet to directly contradict video evidence of crimes (although he's getting there).

That's one of the big reasons Americans are trying to keep their protests civil. If we turn it violent, Trump gets his way and we get don't stand a chance against a military invasion on our own land. Like in California, when Trump sent the National Guard to quell protests against ICE in LA, nothing came of it because no one wanted to start a fight. Protestors showed up, but none of them directly engaged with the military. Eventually the whole military campaign fizzled and the National Guard was recalled home.

We're dealing with that again in Washington D.C. right now. Trump created some fake crime emergency to deploy the National Guard in D.C., despite an all-time low crime rate right now. Protestors are showing up in force, but nothing's happening because they're not directly confronting the National Guard. Just standing their ground and peacefully protesting.

I'm all for revolution; I think the only way we'll fix our broken system is to tear it all down and rebuild from scratch; there are too many corrupt officials, on both sides of the fence, to repair it as is. And too many corrupt laws and regulations in place to function effectively. But you can't just go in with violence. It's a delicate situation right now and violence should be the absolute last resort. Trump has no problem sending millions to their deaths for his ideals and he'll gladly invade our own nation to cement his dictatorship. We can't give him the excuse to do it.

I was serving in the US military when Trump got elected the first time, and that was a scary time for us. He spoke very favorably about various dictators and wanting to reshape America like their countries. But he had a majority Democrat government that kept slapping down every BS thing he tried, so his first term was mostly uneventful.

This time around, though, he has a majority Republican government and enough supporters in high level positions that he's surrounded by yes men. He's been a lot more bold. I'm really glad I retired when I did because there's no way I could follow his unlawful orders.

I think that's the biggest difference between the US and Europe. Europe isn't going to deploy the military to break up violent protests and then use it to enact martial law and overthrow that nation. Trump will, if given the chance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 8 months ago

The final count for No Kings was over 5 million. Glad a bunch of folks that only work 30 hours a week can be at their commin protest point within hours and complain that Americans barely keeping their heads above water have low numbers just because our country is massive.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

NGL memes like this just read like Doomer Cope and Fascist propaganda.

[-] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 21 points 8 months ago

Oh, that's because that's exactly what it is

[-] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 34 points 8 months ago

"Resistance theater" is a great term.

[-] nexguy@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

It's also a term describing the protest non-voters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CubitOom@infosec.pub 26 points 8 months ago
[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 13 points 8 months ago

Is this like a political compass kind of thing?

[-] CubitOom@infosec.pub 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Kind of, it shows that there are a few ways to try to achieve change. So if you keep trying one of those methods and don't see the change you want, it might be time to change tactics.

The political axes of moderate–militant and liberal–radical may seem equivalent, but they are not. It’s true that liberals are often moderates, and radicals are often militants. But that’s not inevitable and it’s not universal. I’ve worked with plenty of radicals who were also moderates, who sought to make fundamental changes in the power dynamics of their communities using low-risk action to make gradual changes. And I’ve worked with liberal militants, who were willing to fight to make changes within established power structures. In any case, all of these approaches can have a time and place in resistance struggles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

The only real resolution is the one people don't want to admit to publicly. They can't even write the words out and publish it. It's not even a game of chicken. Nobody lives forever. History has seen the correct treatment to what he is in the past. It should be done now as well.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 20 points 8 months ago

I've got a solution, get rid of Facebook and Fox News in your Maga people's lives. Put parental controls on their TVs if you can and try to convince them that Fox News was bought out or something. It's the constant deluge of bullshit that's causing this.

MAX FISHER: The places where Facebook usage - not general internet usage, but specifically Facebook usage - was significantly above the average for Germany, the number of attacks on refugees was also well above the average.

SHAPIRO: That's author Max Fisher, who writes about this research in his new book, "The Chaos Machine." It's not just that violence against refugees went up in places where people used Facebook a lot. The researchers also looked at outages - Facebook disruptions - and they found that when the platform went offline in a specific place, attacks against refugees in that community dropped.

FISHER: Extended time on social media is addictive, and it changes your behavior, and it changes the way that your mind works. And it does that in a consistent direction towards more outrage, more extreme ideas and a greater hatred of us versus them.

https://www.npr.org/transcripts/1122786134

[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

You could wipe every reactionary television station, radio station, magazine, social media, and newspaper off the face of the earth, but capitalism's internal contradictions would make their resurgence inevitable.

So long as wages are suppressed, social safety nets withered, wealth inequality balloons, education decays, retirement age grows, and healthcare becomes unattainable, the backside into fascism is inevitable.

How do you think fascism took hold in Germany, and how was it mitigated?

Your analysis falls into the same trap as other liberal analysis - that our means of changing our politics is a function of "changing people's minds" in "the marketplace of ideas". Liberal analysis champions the notion that "ideas" are what turn the wheels of history. In reality, it was Soviet T34s blasting Nazis into mist that mitigated German fascism - not some completely unachievable and unpragmatic scheme to break into retirement homes across the country and put parental controls on grandpa's favorite flavor of right wing pundit TV.

[-] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 8 months ago

Just remember to always vote for the least worst, because there is no good, so that's the best you can do. And fascists are always the worst, by a mile.

[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 13 points 8 months ago

Me in my 20s: "NO EFF YOU! NO COMPROMISE!"

Me, tired, in my 30s: "1 vote for Kodos, please"

[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

80% of Democrat voters: "yeah I know they're owned by corporate interests and won't actually make good on any of their promises, but if I don't vote for them the Republicans will get in"

80% of Republican voters: "yeah I know the GOP is mostly about making themselves rich, but I hate Democrats more than I like the Republican Party"

Votescolds: don't you dare think of trying to upset this perfect beautiful balance that will play out every election for the next thousand years. In fact if you even suggest it you're probably a Russian psyop

[-] prole 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That's just false though since Biden did do a lot of shit that he promised he would.

They both suck, but it's not even close to the same.

Why lie?

[-] tetris11@feddit.uk 9 points 8 months ago

fits the narrative that all politicians are bad and that no one should vote, even if it's the most powerful force of change that ordinary people have at their disposal

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Ooh, anti-democracy propaganda started early this cycle. I guess cons aren't so sure about this one so they had to start this voting supression psyop this time of the year.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'll vote blue out of harm reduction, not out of hope.

IF there's another real election, and IF the Neoliberals win, they'll do NOTHING to reign in the capitalists that fund the fascists because they're bribed to protect the "free market," just as the Fascists are.

All them winning in 2028 might do is buy a little time before the Fascists are on the march the following cycle. That's why it's ignorant when people claim the only reason we're collapsing is Trump. Reagan set the table for fascism and every president since has furthered that outcome. Whether this happened in 2020,2024, 2028, this was happening.

So vote for the Neoliberals all you want. I do it out of the starfish parable, to one delayed fascist action, it matters, but we're still in a capitalist fascist hell, and until we have something to vote or riot for that will bring the capital markets to cinder, nothing can improve. You should feel like throwing up after voting here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 15 points 8 months ago

Americans have so thoroughly bought into the notion that democracy means an entrenched two-party system, that they instinctively view any suggestion to the contrary as "anti-democracy".

Virtually every other functioning democracy in the world manages to maintain legislative houses with anything from 6-20 parties represented in Government, but somehow you've created a self-fulfilling prophecy where it's impossible for you to have because it's impossible for you to have.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 8 months ago

Eat poo no matter who!

[-] Genius@lemmy.zip 16 points 8 months ago

Tankies love to post these memes about how it's hopeless to resist fascism and there's nothing we can do, but what they like to forget is that we leftists have the option of rising against the state, not just by voting, but also by organising for general strikes, civil disobedience, and armed revolution.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
897 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

11873 readers
2769 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS