328
submitted 1 month ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Mastodon, the decentralized social network, stated it cannot comply with age verification laws like Mississippi's recent legislation because it lacks the technical capability to do so[^1]. While Mastodon's software allows server administrators to specify a minimum age of 16 for sign-ups, the age-check data is not stored, and the nonprofit has no way to verify users' ages[^1].

The organization emphasizes that individual server owners must decide for themselves whether to implement age verification, noting that Mastodon was founded specifically "to allow different jurisdictions to have social media that is independent of the U.S."[^1]

This stance follows Bluesky's decision to block service in Mississippi over similar age verification requirements[^1]. Mastodon's position highlights the unique challenges decentralized platforms face with regional compliance, as there is "nobody that can decide for the fediverse to block Mississippi," according to Mastodon founder Eugen Rochko[^1].

[^1]: TechCrunch - Mastodon says it doesn't 'have the means' to comply with age verification laws

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 83 points 1 month ago

And this is as it should be. Fuck the state.

[-] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago

And this is how they want to suppress speech.

[-] Truscape 3 points 1 month ago

May nothing but futility be exposed. "El paquete" flash drives shall flow into the state if need be.

[-] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 month ago

It would be like requiring age verification to subscribe to an RSS feed

[-] SitD@lemy.lol 20 points 1 month ago

๐Ÿ˜ญ would someone think of the children('s idiot parents)

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Can they be called parents when they don't seem to want to do much parenting?

[-] Igilq@szmer.info 15 points 1 month ago

Huge W for mastodon

[-] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why do you think everyone wants to use age verification. To rectrict us to only corporate media and to stop the little online anonymity and privacy we have left.

[-] ell1e@leminal.space 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The mastodon.social is in the EU though, where this also seems to be coming next year: https://leminal.space/post/25089051/17854998 (Unless we all call up our EU representatives and get this reversed or something.)

[-] Mr_WorldlyWiseman 1 points 1 month ago

Nah the EU has GDPR. Any age verification is completely anonymous.

[-] ell1e@leminal.space 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] Mr_WorldlyWiseman 1 points 1 month ago

From your source:

These are used in zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) โ€“ a way for two parties to validate that one of them asserts a fact without learning what that fact is in the process (this is super cool stuff). Users can send their subcredentials to a third party, who can use a ZKP to validate them without learning anything else about the user โ€“ so you could prove your age (or even just prove that you are over 18 without disclosing your age at all) without disclosing your identity.

All the arguments against ZKP on the following paragraphs misunderstand the way the state and intergovernmental institutions, and the rule of law work in the EU. Many EU countries already have digital identity providers that are used every day by their citizens. I think very few people are arguing in favor of dismantling them.

[-] ell1e@leminal.space 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't think arguing "a fascist government can easily force now separate institutions to connect in the future" is a misunderstanding. My apologies if I didn't read your point right, however.

[-] Mr_WorldlyWiseman 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Thanks for the discussion and thanks for raising the issue.

Yeah, I think its a misunderstanding of European political development to think that EU governments would willingly violate their code of human rights like that.

The same anarchist argument could be made about pensions or the military, but the societal benefits of those institutions outweigh the risks of their potential corruption by autocrats.

Anarchism does have its place, and it's important that the EU weighs the risk and reward of centralized idps carefully, and doesn't blindly go for the save the children argument. The use of strict age verification probably isn't worth the risk outside of extreme risks to children's health, like pornography, gambling, and drugs. That is something that the European Commission themselves have said too. Stuff that completely misses that balance like Chat Control needs to die.

[-] ell1e@leminal.space 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I agree the EU has shown a higher human rights interest. But if the temptation is too high, like with a digital ID everyone is habituated to using daily, they'll likely falter eventually. That seems to be Cory Doctorow's angle as well. Edit: shortened.

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

You see a unique challenge. I see a feature.

[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

๐ŸคŒ๐ŸคŒ๐ŸคŒ

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
328 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

42307 readers
686 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS