537
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

lol didn't he say in the debate that the thing about him was that he was the only one who could stand up to the orange guy? these cuomos are really the slimiest, most disgustingly unprincipled people... i never understand people who have literally zero shame.

[-] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago
[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

this NY election is the staging grounds for the next presidential election.

Will there be election interference? national guard show up during the mayoral election day, hitting locations where Zohran is polling well? would the government declare the vote fraudulent and appoint whoever they want? Will the government just arrest/deport/disappear the leading candidate and fabricate a smear campaign?

keep an eye open and if anyone can, they should resist

[-] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 17 points 13 hours ago

I think they'll let Mamdani win and then endlessly fuck with NYC and blame him for it.

[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

socialism always fails... thanks to US interference.

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 12 hours ago

Real talk? New Yorkers kinda fuck with that.

[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 89 points 1 day ago

With his corruption and sexual harassment, joining the Trump camp makes total sense for him.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago

If NY elects Cuomo, one of America's most powerful blue states will be in Trump's pocket.

[-] tmyakal@infosec.pub 9 points 12 hours ago

There's no chance of that happening without some kind of election interference. New Yorkers hate Cuomo. He resigned in disgrace because he's a sexual predator and because he spent COVID killing everyone's grandparents and lying about it. By the time he resigned in disgrace, he was a full mask-off villain.

He's a nepo-baby politician that got to play King of New York for a very short time because of his daddy's connections. Born on third base and thinks he hit a triple. He's only doing this at all because, even though he resigned in disgrace, he thinks he's owed a shot at the White House, and mayor of New York is a first step back into the field.

I genuinely believe Alan Chartok would have a better shot at being mayor at this point.

[-] BigBenis@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Trump was found liable for rape, was responsible for fumbling America's response to COVID killing a lot more than just people's grandparents, and incited a violent insurrection against the Nation's capitol and despite all that America handed him back the keys to the Whitehouse.

The majority of Americans seem to have short memories. Hopefully New Yorkers are better than that.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago

"Trump himself, as well as top Republicans, will say the goal is to stop Mamdani... and you'll be wasting your vote on Sliwa. So I feel good about that," Cuomo said in a leaked recording.

Liberals are in bed with MAGA. Just different kool-aid flavors.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Liberals are in bed with MAGA

What an absurd and reductive take, have you considered including a drop of nuance with your hyperbole?

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Are you shilling for corporations, the rich, and in bed with MAGA? No? Then, Stfu, it doesn't apply to you.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago

Neo-libs are

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago

Is it your impression that Cuomo is a liberal?

[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 23 hours ago

depends on your definition of liberal

[-] chocosoldier 3 points 23 hours ago

yes, and i'm tired of pretending the word doesn't mean "capitalist pig".

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 15 hours ago

Yes that's about what I thought you thought it meant lol

At a certain point in a tribal structure and framework, a word just gets reframed to mean "enemy" and becomes more or less useless for having any kind of conversation, because of logic like this.

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 13 hours ago

liberalism is that political philosophy which combines capitalist economics with democratic election based governance. and yes, capitalists are the enemy, good job!

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Doesn't sound like Cuomo is very in favor of democratic election based governance, that's kind of literally 100% of the point of why he's even in the news still

And yes, lumping anyone who is "enemy" into the same category and using catchy labels for them and using labels for one "enemy" camp to refer to people who are in a totally different camp, because what's the difference the important thing is we found an enemy, is exactly the thinking I am calling out. Good job providing a pretty good example of it

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

split whatever hairs you think will help you sleep at night, lib.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago

Wait, why am I a lib now? You know me, you know my viewpoint? Or you just start deciding anyone who disagrees with you in any way, must be a liberal otherwise they wouldn't be disagreeing with you?

It's actually remarkable how well this propaganda framework works. It's actually exactly the same as a lot of the MAGA structure, where they declare media as "biased" or people as "Marxist." It doesn't matter whether it's actually true. It's just a little self-sustaining structure, a reason to dismiss anyone who disagrees with them in any way, and they don't need to think any more about it once that box has been ticked.

I've actually noticed this thought process in a lot of Lemmy people. That little fumble where you decided Cuomo was a liberal might seem like kind of a trivial misstatement or something, but it's actually hugely telling about how your thought processes are working. I would really encourage you to reflect on it.

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

i'm sure you have an argument, i'm just not interested in masturbatory hair splitting and mental gymnastics anymore. but thanks for making assumptions about me, my thought process, and my stances, while lambasting me for doing the same when you've offered no clear position of your own except "lol u dum" dressed up in flowery language.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago

i'm just not interested in masturbatory hair splitting and mental gymnastics anymore

Good to hear! I'd recommend letting go of them, yes. Good job!

[-] Goldholz 1 points 18 hours ago

Depending where you are from it doesnt though. Same as "freedom to..." and "freedom from..." are two completely different aspects. Economic liberal and social liberal are two different ways of thinking

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 13 hours ago

split hairs all you like, liberals are capitalists and capitalism is poison

[-] Goldholz 1 points 11 hours ago

I am not splitting hair. Are equal rights and minority protection capitalist ideas? Is democracy capitalistic? The right to education and religiouse freedom? The freedom to not be exploited at the workplace?

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

rofl you're talking to a middle aged queer and religious minority who has spent their entire adult life watching liberals make it very fucking clear that they don't give a shit about any of those things, they pay lip service then throw us under the bus the moment they're elected. for decades they have declined opportunity after opportunity to codify our rights into legislated law, preferring to leave it as case law and impotently stand by as the courts are captured to the inevitable end of our rights being stripped from us, which is now in progress. stop being so naive.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 34 points 1 day ago

Holy fuck, Cuomo just won't give up. The voters have spoken very clearly, and they said "you fucking lost."

[-] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's a winning strategy if they can pull it off. Spoil the democrats' vote by organizing the republicans who know they are bound to lose to vote for cuomo. and once again the only thing on decency's side is decency itself because this coordination is perfectly lawful, and mamdani can basically only appeal to the honor of cheaters or the passion of an apathetic public to do anything about this.

~~What I'm not seeing is any explanation for why the DNC, an independent and definitely-not-captured opposition party, is accepting help from president Donald "not only is the emperor not wearing any clothes but i'm pretty sure I can make out decades-old dried blood and jism on his thighs" Trump. Unless of course cuomo has taken that extraordinary step for himself, which of course leads to the question of why the DNC, an independent and definitely-not-captured opposition party, would tolerate such a brazen display of broken faith and ~~seeking~~ finding comfort from their supposed opponents.~~ it's because cuomo isn't running as a democrat this time.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago

What I’m not seeing is any explanation for why the DNC ... is accepting help

Cuomo is running as an independent. He is running against the DNC.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 9 points 20 hours ago

Cuomo is running against the Democratic nominee, not the DNC. I haven't seen the DNC has step up to back Mamdani, and it's pretty clear that DNC leadership backs Cuomo.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

The closest I've seen is an interview With Tim Miller of The Bulwark and Jeffries. In that interview he presses him on that, where's the endorsement? All he could bring himself to answer with was 'I can tell you, the only person I have scheduled meetings with are with Mamdani', so actually I'd say it's pretty clear that DNC leadership isn't backing Cuomo but also not doing much for Mamdani either, which is bad and absurd but not as bad actually as backing someone other than who the people chose in the primary.

You can't simply take the lack of vocal support in this intermediate time in between as clear evidence that they back Cuomo, reality is far more nuanced. Your take could have more ground to stand on as we get closer to the actual election without anything different happening though.

interview link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_szbshrgQHg

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 6 hours ago

The DNC doesn't get the benefit of the doubt. No endorsement and no support from Democratic leaders is active opposition to his run. They burned up all their second chances years ago. Anyone paying attention knows who they are.

[-] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 1 points 16 hours ago

I'll be goddamned, you're right. Not a single thing on his campaign website about DNC.

[-] tonytins@pawb.social 39 points 1 day ago

He's doing a great job sinking whatever is left of his reputation.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago

I knew the president very well

Do tell us about that, known sex pest Andrew Cuomo

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
537 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25300 readers
2456 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS