537
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago

Is it your impression that Cuomo is a liberal?

[-] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

depends on your definition of liberal

[-] chocosoldier 3 points 1 day ago

yes, and i'm tired of pretending the word doesn't mean "capitalist pig".

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 18 hours ago

Yes that's about what I thought you thought it meant lol

At a certain point in a tribal structure and framework, a word just gets reframed to mean "enemy" and becomes more or less useless for having any kind of conversation, because of logic like this.

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 16 hours ago

liberalism is that political philosophy which combines capitalist economics with democratic election based governance. and yes, capitalists are the enemy, good job!

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Doesn't sound like Cuomo is very in favor of democratic election based governance, that's kind of literally 100% of the point of why he's even in the news still

And yes, lumping anyone who is "enemy" into the same category and using catchy labels for them and using labels for one "enemy" camp to refer to people who are in a totally different camp, because what's the difference the important thing is we found an enemy, is exactly the thinking I am calling out. Good job providing a pretty good example of it

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

split whatever hairs you think will help you sleep at night, lib.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 15 hours ago

Wait, why am I a lib now? You know me, you know my viewpoint? Or you just start deciding anyone who disagrees with you in any way, must be a liberal otherwise they wouldn't be disagreeing with you?

It's actually remarkable how well this propaganda framework works. It's actually exactly the same as a lot of the MAGA structure, where they declare media as "biased" or people as "Marxist." It doesn't matter whether it's actually true. It's just a little self-sustaining structure, a reason to dismiss anyone who disagrees with them in any way, and they don't need to think any more about it once that box has been ticked.

I've actually noticed this thought process in a lot of Lemmy people. That little fumble where you decided Cuomo was a liberal might seem like kind of a trivial misstatement or something, but it's actually hugely telling about how your thought processes are working. I would really encourage you to reflect on it.

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

i'm sure you have an argument, i'm just not interested in masturbatory hair splitting and mental gymnastics anymore. but thanks for making assumptions about me, my thought process, and my stances, while lambasting me for doing the same when you've offered no clear position of your own except "lol u dum" dressed up in flowery language.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

i'm just not interested in masturbatory hair splitting and mental gymnastics anymore

Good to hear! I'd recommend letting go of them, yes. Good job!

[-] Goldholz 1 points 21 hours ago

Depending where you are from it doesnt though. Same as "freedom to..." and "freedom from..." are two completely different aspects. Economic liberal and social liberal are two different ways of thinking

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 16 hours ago

split hairs all you like, liberals are capitalists and capitalism is poison

[-] Goldholz 1 points 14 hours ago

I am not splitting hair. Are equal rights and minority protection capitalist ideas? Is democracy capitalistic? The right to education and religiouse freedom? The freedom to not be exploited at the workplace?

[-] chocosoldier 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

rofl you're talking to a middle aged queer and religious minority who has spent their entire adult life watching liberals make it very fucking clear that they don't give a shit about any of those things, they pay lip service then throw us under the bus the moment they're elected. for decades they have declined opportunity after opportunity to codify our rights into legislated law, preferring to leave it as case law and impotently stand by as the courts are captured to the inevitable end of our rights being stripped from us, which is now in progress. stop being so naive.

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
537 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25300 readers
2458 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS