679
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stupe@lemmy.zip 247 points 3 weeks ago

I don't trust them either.

[-] tonytins@pawb.social 117 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah. As much as I want them to keep fighting, it's probably for the better they don't in this case. I've realized that the GOP want people to keep appealing and have it go straight to SCOTUS.

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 80 points 3 weeks ago

I wouldn't be surprised if this SCOTUS starts handing down "rulings" for Null v Null cases - completely unsolicited and unprompted bans and overturns of settled precedent. In other words, literally lawmaking from the bench, the thing that fascist conservatives have been disingenuously railing against for years.

[-] scutiger@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago

They already did that with Roe. Suddenly decided that 50 years of precedent didn't matter and overnight destroyed all confidence the country had in the SC.

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 10 points 3 weeks ago

A case still had to make it's way to them. They will drop that pretense soon enough.

They'll just reveal "the Willard case", a 6-0 decision, that the 19th Amendment to the Contitution is Unconstitutional. It cites the Pragmatic Sanction, a foundational text to our Republic, as the reason that women are not allowed to vote or hold property.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Feels like they’d go after 14th before 19th. Since it enables so many other things and they want slavery back.

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 6 points 3 weeks ago

I uh, I hate the be the one to tell you this.

The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime.

Slavery never went away, it just needs an extra step. It's why Republicans criminalize "being Black," why they love to criminalize lots of things they don't like. In fact they probably would love to keep the 13th exactly as it is because it gives them perfect cover for the rubes. "We're not racist, we just don't like criminals!"

As for the 14th, they don't have to burn it, they just have to constantly reinterpret it around White Grievance politics. See the redistricting fight currently happening today. Drawing voting districts to accurately represent minority populations in Congress is "akshually racist against white people."

[-] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 weeks ago

Fascists speaking out of both sides of their mouths? Unheard of!

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 2 points 3 weeks ago
[-] aeternum 2 points 3 weeks ago

unpossible!

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 30 points 3 weeks ago

Trust is earned, they must have heard that as "burned."

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 112 points 3 weeks ago

The supreme court only matters because we believe in it. States could just.. choose not to follow their instructions.

[-] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 85 points 3 weeks ago

Trump has been doing it all year so why not

[-] prole 11 points 3 weeks ago

Because he runs the federal government right now, and the federal government has power over the states, so he will punish them.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Half a year...

[-] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

This is gonna be awesome when it starts happening.

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 78 points 3 weeks ago

Well... expect more of this about a lot of things. We're in the endgame now.

[-] db2@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

This endgame is different than last weeks? Don't kid yourself.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 68 points 3 weeks ago

Why wouldn’t everyone just trust a corrupt, illegitimate, unelected, unaccountable, fascist organization that shows open contempt for the US Constitution, rule of law, democracy, and basic ethics? /s

Gotta wait until the SC has some… personnel vacancies, if you get my drift.

[-] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 18 points 3 weeks ago

There's four justices over the age of 70 (one is Sotomayor). Not that age means much in regards to mortality when one has the resources that they do

[-] DSTGU@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 weeks ago

I believe above user was subtly referencing other causes for personnel vacancies like being greeted by Luigi's of this world.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Bummer. They since the outcome would be the same, they should make the SC go on record to rule on it. Put it in the history books.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 34 points 3 weeks ago

Then it can't be appealed later.

[-] Natanael@infosec.pub 6 points 3 weeks ago

Anything can be reconsidered by a later SCOTUS if they're willing

[-] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, stare decisis means nothing anymore according to this Supreme court.

They bend over backwards to get the outcome they desire.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago

Knowing this Supreme Court, it could totally be worse than the same outcome.

[-] Zorsith 13 points 3 weeks ago

They could also deliberately go out of their way to make it worse.

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 47 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

A SCOTUS ruling could potentially make the outcome worse, widen the scope and enshrine it as a national precedent.

There is always wisdom in picking your battles.

[-] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 3 weeks ago

Right. That was my addled minded point. They've already won. Thank you for expanding on it, since I very clearly missed the explanation. Whoops

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
679 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

74627 readers
2106 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS