493
submitted 2 weeks ago by sirico@feddit.uk to c/games@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 132 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I am still baffled that anyone thinks that Kernel AC is any kind of effective at stopping hacks, people have been literally making a living off of defeating it, and selling those hacks / methods for almost a decade now...

But nope, still got hordes of idiot gamers who think they work, think they're necessary, think they can't be spoofed.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 weeks ago

It's crazy to me that people cheat in online games. You really have to be a huge fucking loser to do this.

Small pp energy.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 114 points 2 weeks ago

I love the Battlefield series but I'm not turning on Secure Boot for them. If it remains a hard requirement, I'll simply be passing altogether.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

I was able to get around secure boot by installing the beta on my PS5. From then, I had the pleasure of being unable to enter due to broken menus! Can’t complain for having spent nothing and having little trust in the franchise.

[-] PHLAK@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

There's nothing wrong with Secure Boot and enabling it can prevent a small subset of attack vectors with no real downsides. That being said, the things Secure Boot does protect against aren't likely to be an issue for most users but it's nothing to be afraid of.

[-] pathief@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago

If you want to install Linux, secure boot limits the distributions you can use. If you don't then it's whatever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brezel@piefed.social 81 points 2 weeks ago

beautiful. fuck secureboot.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago
[-] brezel@piefed.social 111 points 2 weeks ago
  • some people run more than 1 OS
  • some people actually program and need to load unsigned shit all the time
  • some people have legacy hardware that doesn't run with secureboot
  • it is my decision and my decision alone how i boot my operating systems. not EA's.
[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago
  1. You can run more than one OS with secure boot enabled. It’s just a pain in the ass.
  2. you can run unsigned code on a secure boot enabled system.
  3. its 2025, what the fuck do you have that can’t secure boot by now?
  4. THIS is your winning argument.
[-] Truscape 26 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

(1) Yeah, well the secure boot keys needed for Linux distributions expire in September (https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/cyber-security/microsoft-signing-key-required-for-secure-boot-uefi-bootloader-expires-in-september-which-could-be-problematic-for-linux-users), so that seems like a sustainable solution, sure buddy.

(3) What's your income? What region of the world do you live in and what hardware is available to you? I'm still using an am4 platform PC as my daily driver because I can't burn money. One of my buddies has an AM3 PC. Many people use modified surplus office PCs (especially in developing nations like South America or SEA), which don't have secure boot as an option. Check your privilege, and maybe donate some of your spare hardware to those who need it, if you want to make this "a non issue" for everyone.

(4) Yeah. I own my hardware, I configure my software. I gut Windows like a fish and keep it on a leash for these games, and use Linux for my work and for the games that respect the ecosystem.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Alaik@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think he needs a winning argument. I think EA needs to justify this kernel level AC, not the other way around.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Im fairly certain any legacy hardware that doesn't have secure boot as an option is going to struggle loading BF6 regardless.

The first two points are not related to secure boot at all.

[-] brezel@piefed.social 17 points 2 weeks ago

you think loading my own kernel modules is not related to secure boot? i guess you don't work in IT then.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago

Needlessly intrusive. Can obviously be circumvented by cheaters anyway, so quite possibly superfluous. Apart from that it protects against the kinds of attacks that typically require physical access to the computer. If you have physical access you have full access anyway. Etc.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

If you have physical access you have full access anyway. Etc.

You know secure boot was specifically made to protect users for this exact use case. Any tampering of the system will prevent the system from booting.

[-] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago

I get your pc, "tamper" it, then i install a fake bios that tells you all is well and that your tpm and secureboot and whatever else bullcrap they invent is still happy.

See the problem?

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SoupBrick@pawb.social 17 points 2 weeks ago

It fucks with Linux. I literally just disabled it to resolve a driver install issue before this announcement was made.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 51 points 2 weeks ago

So I can’t play battlefield without TPM? I hate tech these days. My Ryzen board doesnt have it. Hence why I’m not on windows 11

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] lorty@lemmy.ml 48 points 2 weeks ago

Your anti-cheat doesn't work anyway so let me play in linux you cowards.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Defaced@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago

Anyone with half a brain could see this coming from a mile away. My conspiracy brain almost thinks this is some concerted and calculated effort by Microsoft to artificially lock games to Windows through anti cheat. It's disgusting, isn't needed, and just plain isn't effective. They can spew all the metrics out of their ass, we all know that it's just not effective.

[-] wizzim@infosec.pub 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I am not sure about this conspiracy theory of yours: Microsoft does not want third party applications in the kernel space anymore.

https://www.theverge.com/news/692637/microsoft-windows-kernel-antivirus-changes

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

a year ago on Mastodon when EA started locking out games like Apex Legends, BF1, V, 2042, etc from Linux I said "I bet you Microsoft is about to launch a handheld and since they have a deal with EA and Gamepass they want EA Exclusivity on their handheld and to lockout Steamdeck/Valve" sure enough a few months later Microsoft announces their Xbox handheld with Asus.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PushButton@lemmy.world 39 points 2 weeks ago

So you got the spyware without the benefits, that's a hell of a surprise isn't it?

But thank you for your money suckers!

[-] poolhelmetinstrument@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

This is where we need dedicated servers and self moderation

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 weeks ago

Yep.

Things were better when private servers had actual mods and admins, they acted more like pubs where you could go see the regulars, actually form a community.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago

I only found out about this today from someone whose computer got bricked from trying to enable secure boot.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 weeks ago

Having Anti-Cheat of any kind outside of the game is laziness or lack of resources.

I believe just have physical limitations of the character or objects and verify the movement every once in a while to make sure that their movement is not super human (ie, aim bots).

You don't need a kernal level anti-cheat.

[-] warm@kbin.earth 30 points 2 weeks ago

The best thing is back when Battlefield was Battlefield, it would self-regulate because most people played on self-hosted servers, so cheaters and bad actors were taken care of swiftly. But now they want their own control to put shitty bots and SBMM in the game, so here we are.

This whole game is a case of the devs making bad decisions and then instead of changing them decisions, they apply the quickest bandaid fixes they can.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Kernel anti-cheat does absolutely nothing to prevent aimbots/triggerbots, as most are run using 2 separate machines, anyway. The first machine runs the game in a totally clean and legitimate environment, but sends its video output (either using standard streaming tools like OBS or by using special hardware) to the 2nd machine. The 2nd machine runs the cheat and processes the video to detect where to aim and/or when to shoot, and sends mouse input back to the 1st machine.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] mugita_sokiovt@discuss.online 29 points 2 weeks ago

I'm glad I didn't enable Tivoization (Secure Boot) and TPM. Those suck, and actually froze our machines. It's literally useless at this point.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago

They're gonna kill this game aren't they.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] prole 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Why are people like this. How does this make gaming enjoyable?

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, if I had the skills I'd be doing that as an explicit fuck you to the draconian anticheat bullshit they force on everyone, because what better fuck you than showing all that effort was for naught, especially close to launch.

EA can go fuck themselves with the world's biggest cactus.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Hm, yeah, it's something every developer should know; client-side validation of input still needs server-side validation, because client-side is not reliable, no mather what you force on them.

[-] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 14 points 2 weeks ago

Server side anticheats need to be considered. Clientside has been annoying users far too much, and can be bypassed. A combination of both (and I’d like a less intrusive clientside one) would be better

[-] ChaosSpectre@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago

More proof that anti-cheat and bans just isn't a working approach.

Almost every cheater I've talked to or seen interviewed has said they do it because they like winning. If thats the case, pushing them away isnt getting rid of them, its making them try to win harder, and they are literally spending money to make that happen.

This means, there is a market for cheaters, one that publishers and devs simply assault instead of realizing they could replace it entirely.

Create a marketplace in your game for cheats. When a player buys a cheat in game, they can turn it on but only in a specific playlist that cheaters get to play in. You dont need to own or turn on cheats to play in that playlist, in case you feel like challenging yourself, but cheaters can use them as much as they want in that playlist. If a cheater wants to go into cheat free playlist, their cheats get turned off by the game and they have to play like everyone else. Cheat free playlists can have cheat detection, and if you are caught cheating then you get banned from cheat free playlists permanently, but you arent banned from the game or the cheat playlist.

This deters cheaters from paying third parties for cheats, gives them a space to experiment in, makes money for the company running the game, and reduces the amount of cheaters in regular public lobbies. It also creates a space of challenge for people who don't cheat, sorta like how people will do no death runs in souls games.

Sure, it isnt a perfect solution, but its far better than punishing every player with invasive tech, while simultaneously letting a market of cheat sellers thrive. For a bunch of capitalists, its wild they haven't realized they are missing out on money with cheats.

[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

I suspect that if you're now playing where everyone else gets the same advantages, that ruins the fun of having cheats

If not and the cheats themselves are just that fun to use, sure, add it in as another gamemode

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Pretty much the same as all the other modern BFs. They all had cheats in the Beta/early release versions. I’ve played and own literally every BF game since the original release of 1942. Cheats have always been present more or less.

[-] CtrlAltDyeet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

And yet they have the audacity to block Linux players

[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
493 points (100.0% liked)

Games

41824 readers
1227 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS