578
The cruelty is the point.
Fuck every idiot who voted for this.
There is a Hell and we are living in it.
This isn't just cruelty
You don't want trans people actively in your military when the insurrection starts.
The expediency here should make it clear how fast paced the plans are.
I hope I live long enough to see every idiot who enabled this shit standing in front of Nuremberg 2
I agree that all guilty of treason. Not to mention really shitty people.
Imagine having 18 years in, just about to retire with full pension and this happens. Talk about radicalized.
Has anybody in Nuremberg 1 been punished for crimes against their own population?
Eichmann was, no?
He was punished later.
They're still building hell
We don't have to live in it
it's not just cruelty it's the subtle (hell at this point not so subtle) hints that "we need to surround ourselves with loyalists to OUR cause, not the country" Because when the squads start rolling out to not just detain people but to line them up on the street probably not the best idea to have transgender/gay/people of color on the other side of the trigger.
the shit is coming, and soon. ICE is now recruiting teens as an obvious scapegoat for one slipped trigger finger.
What if we were unknowingly in hell?
Then you have nothing to lose.
Grab a Molotov
This is the same old shit and gay people will be next followed by people of color.
I was in when they ended don't ask, don't tell. There was a person in for 19 years. Openly gay. So much so, they would take other shipmates to gays bars with them all the time. It was never a secret.
I assume you are asking the obvious question "19 years?" Someone reported them to the command and they kicked them out before reaching 20 years. Fucking less than honorable discharge. Fuck any one that calls them self a vet/member of any branch and supports this shit. You are no brother or sister of mine. If I seen you bleeding out, I would frag your ass.
A lot I can understand but you take an oath to support your family in arms. Hegseth is a GOD DAMN traitor to his country and the service.
"Suckers and losers"
-The Current Commander in Chief-
They took an oath to defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. They abandoned their oath and are now suffering the penalties of being an oathbreaker.
Real life isn't like movies, "oaths" don't mean anything than gloifying a few lines of words. I mean, when has anyone in a position of power ever took their oaths seriously?
Yes. Absolutely yes. But with consequences.
Trump is a bigger traitor and people voted him for commander in chief. Americans be weird.
I expect nothing less from Commander in chief bone spurs. Vance and Hegseth served. They are suppose to help their brothers and sisters in arms. Not shoot them in the back.
That shit pissed me off. He was denied a military pension by some fucking bigot.
Don't join the armed forces, the government does not give a shit about veterans
Republicans especially don't care about veterans or active duty
And it’s absolutely insane how they can get away with all the “rah rah troops” bullshit when they are violently and demonstrably against any part or context of the military outside of the concept of “do exactly what the fuck I say” - by which I mean the existence and exploitation of its inherent ironclad chain of command.
30% of federal employees are also veterans and they've been getting fucked all year.
There's countless stories. They do not give a shit about you. YOU is YOU. Everyone. These greedy fuckers. DO. NOT. CARE. ABOUT. YOU.
the gop NEVER DID, and never will. its all performative politics. im guessing rural ones still support these parasites.
"sepersted from the service"
You mean fired due to discrimination?
They're after the wrong 1%
Social conservatives are a hateful people. Bitter and hateful. They’re the bad guys of the world.
If I had served in the military and this was how I was treated on the way out, I'd probably use my training to do my best to inflict harm on the decision-makers.
I wonder if this has any connection to the sargeant who shot up Fort Stewart?
Unlikely. That guy was in a different branch of service (Army) and he hadn't been in long enough to be directly affected anyway.
Thanks, I haven't heard anything else about that than the initial report.
This has to be grounds for a lawsuit.
Maybe if the judiciary system would be fair, non-political and not corrupt. However....
i guess you never got the memo. drumpf doesn't give a fuck about lawsuits or courts.
You mean the guy who mocked a POW opponent by saying he doesn't like losers?
Anyone who thinks he supports the military has a favorite flavor of crayon, and that is not a marine joke.
Did everyone just forget that during his first term when he went to arlington he would point at caskets and call them losers.
Right? You'd think Trump would have lost the Veteran Vote, but no apparently they said "Thank you sir, I'd like some more sir!"
Yes... yes they did.
The guy that constantly ignores the constitution doesn't support the people that swore to defend it? Crazy. Any military member that voted for him should be kicked out for supporting an insurrectionist.
Air force report in January 2026: Because of no reasons whatsoever, there has been a surge in fragging incidents and former military involved mass shootings. For that reason, we are banning all members of the military who do not possess certain genetic attributes.
Heil trump.
Boo fucking hoo. No sympathy for the war machine.
Me neighter, but that's not a reason to treat people inhumane. There's no excuse for racism and discrimination. No justification for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
That is some super dishonorable shit.
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
578 points (100.0% liked)
News
31937 readers
2343 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS