260
submitted 2 days ago by fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 88 points 2 days ago

Wow, he ignored the flaws? I’m so glad for this new report, the plethora of previous reports didn’t already tell us that at all!

[-] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 2 days ago

Even funnier: This news article is so well written/edited, that the headline doesn't even state that he ignored the flaws; It clearly states that he ignored the sub itself. Truly the pinnacle of journalism.

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 81 points 2 days ago

Watch the Netflix doc on this. It's quite the watch and the writing was on the wall for years!

Carbon Fiber just wasn't cutting it, but he just kept going and going. He could hear the strands of the fiber breaking and just didn't care. What kind of psychopath ignore that? Crazy shit.

[-] Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago

A narcissistic one, with money, and no real understanding of the equipment. They are much more common than you would think in the c suite.

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sadly I’ve seen this up close. Not only do CEO’s, not know, they don’t want to know. They really want the story that says, we are making money, and here’s how.

[-] SnotFlickerman 23 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is literally why the AI industry even continues to exist despite not living up to expectations. The CEOs just want to replace humans with AI so badly they're willing to ignore the reality on the ground of it being half-assed.

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Makes sense really from a profit standpoint. Replace humans that need sleep. Healthcare and wages with one time costs.

Too bad its not all fun and games when you put AI in charge of critical systems.

[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In this particular case, the CEO was made aware of the issue. I read another article some time back where someone else who worked there reported the issues to him and was ignored. This guy knew, he just... I don't know, thought nothing bad could ever happen to him? He was practically an underwater Icarus.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Carbon Fiber just wasn’t cutting it

Yup. Guy came up in aerospace, and while carbon fiber air frames have to deal with all sorts of freaky, weird stresses, simple compression is not one of them. The difference between sea level and basically outer space is exactly one atmosphere. The difference between sea level and the Titanic is… well… somewhat more.

[-] Odo@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

"How many atmospheres can the ship withstand?"

"Well, it's a spaceship so I'd say anywhere between zero and one."

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago

That joke gets me every time.

[-] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Saving you a click- it's 400 atmospheres.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 17 points 2 days ago

I just heard a video of a test and you could hear the delamination. I really don't get how everyone single person involved didn't be like "yo homie, wtf‽" with every single bang! These people are supposed to be experts on this field. I have a maybe possible community college passing level of material engineering, and even I was like "what is wrong with everyone????"

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

A bad case of affluenza.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago

He just wanted a hug?

He wanted to go out with a bang?

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

He certainly made a splash, but he just couldn't handle the pressure.

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

He definitely went out in a cloud of pink dust, that's for sure.

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Crime weekly just wrapped up the series. It’s also very good… and very long. 5/6 hours.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago
[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 days ago

If only other CEOs would put their own lives at stake when ignoring basic safety to save money.

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Yes. But this CEO had to drag other people along because he couldn’t afford it without other peoples money.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Yeah but government disaster reports are supposed to be slow. It's every i dotted, every t crossed, and the providence of every screw investigated. Oftentimes the root cause is what everyone knew already, but the report is meant to leave no doubt and to label every step of failure so that people can recognize and resolve intermediate level causes and understand the immediate causes.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Nooo stop being reasonable I'm trying to be smug 😔

Yeah, I remember reading a past article about how the CEO was repeatedly informed about critical issues with this sub, but he didn't seem to care. At least he was among those who died. If he hadn't been aboard this sub, would he have changed his tune? All I know about this guy is that he was a scumbag CEO who ignored vital safety issues, so I'm going to guess "hell no."

[-] Joeffect@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Who would think building a sub out of parts you get from like homedepot with a wirelress controller would idono not be safe...

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 52 points 2 days ago

What a heartwarming tale of billionaire hubris.

I have a dream one day this is something all billionaires will have the chance to experience!

[-] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Maybe there is a reason they are looking at space travel vs deep sea travel, space has more protections.

[-] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Can't say for sure the documentary is 100% accurate, but if it's to be believed, many smart people tried to tell this guy his stupid sub was unsafe many times, but he consistently ignored all of them, because arrogance and vanity.

oh no anyway.jpg

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

My wife is obsessed with this event and 2nd hand I've heard most of the facts on this. There were red flags everywhere. You didn't have to be a sub expert to know that was a ticking time bomb, but unfortunately the crucial data that could've saved those lives was continually buried. There's actually a lot of similarity between the Oceangate scandal and Theranos.

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

He fired anyone that told him it was unsafe and surrounded himself by yes men/women. This was bound to happen.

[-] Philote@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago

Just imagine if someone did that to a country. That would be terrible.

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

It's like we shouldn't elect shitty businessmen with inherited money to public office.

[-] atticus88th@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

Sucks that he took others lives but it should be required that every CEO be out front on the products or services they sell.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Especially when they sell self-driving cars that crash and spaceships that explode. At least Stockton Rush's hubris took care of the problem for him.

[-] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 1 day ago

Oh look, more distractions from convicted rapist and guaranteed pedophile Donald Trump.

[-] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago

Let's stop tip toeing around the correct term....

Criminal negligence

  1. (1) Every one is criminally negligent who
(a) in doing anything, or
(b) in omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do, shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons. 
[-] TorJansen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

So let's get the MAGA administration in on this one. They're doing this daily with ICE.

[-] Lexam@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

This is the type of enshitification we need more of.

[-] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago

There's documentary on Netflix showing how ignorant and self absordbed the dude was.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 11 points 2 days ago

So self-absorbed that he imploded.

[-] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

He probably didn't use enough AI in the design process.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Oddly AI probably would’ve caught the warning signs just fine. LLMs are stupid but people can be just as bad if not worse

[-] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago

That guy would probably have continued regardless, even if some AI would have said: Danger hull collapse imminent!, he would just have disabled the alarm.

[-] jouhija@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 days ago

At least he took out a couple other multimillionaires with him. Good riddance

[-] prof@infosec.pub 9 points 2 days ago

And a well respected historian and just a kid.

Certainly not good riddance.

[-] jouhija@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

"Just a kid" from a multimillionaire family, don't tell me he wouldn't have grown up to be a piece of shit like the rest of them. Each ticket was over 200 000$, instead of spending it on some wanker's ego project they could've done some good with the money

E: imagine sucking on billionaire boots like prof here, pathetic

[-] prof@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago

Well, we could have found out what he did with his life if he didn't die.

[-] jouhija@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

We could've lived without knowing what Trump or Musk grew up to be but here we are

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
260 points (100.0% liked)

News

31456 readers
3290 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS