698
they don't mind (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 weeks ago by not_IO to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Soup@lemmy.world 95 points 2 weeks ago

Every single person who complains that “they” is weird has, without the slightest wisp of a shadow of a doubt, said something along the lines of “yeah their coat is just over there” or “I think they were saying that…”. They can already do it, and it’s not hard, they just really wanna hate.

[-] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago

I'm fine with 'they', but I think you're misrepresenting the very real problem that is inserting a 3rd-person pronoun as a personal pronoun due to the existing patterns ingrained and interpreted through speech.

It doesn't hurt me to try and make the conscious change, I do actively try for the people in my life, but it DOES flow weird in my brain and takes more mental effort to keep straight. At least, it still does, it might get easier with more time, I don't know.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

We’ve been doing it for hundreds of years. If you really want to fix something then come up with a plural for “you”; that would be far more helpful.

You may not notice those times you say “they” like in the examples I already gave, but you do say it, and the only thing tripping you up is that you’re thinking about it. It’s like breathing, it’s weird when you’re paying attention but it’s not wrong and you’ve always done it.

[-] brisk@aussie.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago

"You" is the plural of "thou". It even has plural grammar ("you are", not "you is")

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know why you're being downvoted. You're correct. Plural they is at least as old as Shakespeare. The notion that it's only singular is modern.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

People really don’t want to treat trans people properly and they’ll even pretend shit they already do easily is somehow weird and too difficult. I’m just a cis dude over her, with a host of non-binary friends, and for the most part I just say “they” and haven’t died yet. And I fuck it up sometimes and don’t get hung from the rafters like these goons think will happen, probably because the only scenario they know is when they get it wrong on purpose or are otherwise agitating someone.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Your anger is on a completely irrational level. I don't understand trans mentality, because I don't feel like a man or woman — I just feel like me — though I want what's best for them (the same as anyone) but referring to someone in the 3rd person makes me feel like I'm referring to someone with schizophrenia or multiple personality disorder. There's even an old Seinfeld episode about a guy that refers to himself in the 3rd person and comedy ensues, because nobody does that.

Just because culture and language doesn't fulfill your requirements or align with your expectations, doesn't mean that the people of that culture or language are malicious and hateful towards you. The world is not required to bend to your feefees. Hell, the only reason I don't care about pronouns is because I struggle to remember names... People tend to get offended when you forget their names as it is, now I have to add another dimension I'll undoubtably fuck up... I can accept trans people being the way they are without giving a fuck, but apparently I can't expect the same acceptance for my brain being the way it is, and if I don't dot my I's and cross my T's as you see fit I risk being called a bigot, so fuck me I guess...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

They has always been a 3rd person personal pronoun just like he/she/it have as far as I know. The thing that people find upsetting is that people want to go back to using it as a singular after some grammarians decided everyone should use he or her for a while.

[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The singular "they" isn't even the first time English has specifically appropriated a plural pronoun for the singular for the sake of social respect!!!

We don't even use the second person singular "thou" anymore, we just use "you" for both of them!

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

At one point in American history the singular they was normal and accepted but the singular you was deeply controversial

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

As a side note, if I'm talking to you, I won't be using "they", that's only for talking about you

[-] Ebber@lemmings.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

TIL 'thou' is second person singular

[-] Damage@feddit.it 27 points 2 weeks ago
[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Damage@feddit.it 20 points 2 weeks ago

It's an inherited property, so yeah them too

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 weeks ago

Only weirdos talk to tits, I, as a gentleman, always address each individually (by their preferred pronouns ofc).

/s

[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

When he was 2, one of my nephews decided to name my tits after the main characters of his favorite TV show. I thought it was so funny that I still introduce them to partners as Bingo and Rolly.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lol.

Better than:
- Tom & Jerry
- Mario & green Mario
- Finn & Jake
- Patrick & SpongeBob
- Fox & Dana
- Beavis & Butthead

Ohh, Bingo & Rolly are sweater puppies, now I get it!

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

I still sometimes get those two wrong ...

[-] four@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 weeks ago

"They did a great job on the last project. They are a valuable member of the team"

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

I have (begrudgingly) gotten used to "singular they". I accept that I am not an authority on how language is used, and this is how the language has evolved. I'd have preferred a separate singular non-gendered pronoun, but I wasn't consulted because, again, not an authority on the subject. It is fine, I will adapt (and have already done so to some degree).

HOWEVER, I still have beef with what happened to "literally" and will bring it up any time semantic shift is the subject of conversation.

[-] kerrigan778 33 points 2 weeks ago

Asking "how are they doing" when referring to a singular third person has literally always been normal english. The singular they has basically always been fine and proper english.

[-] echolalia@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 weeks ago

Shakespeare had no problem with singular they, by the way.

I also found it natural to use before I had a concept of those existing outside the gender binary. "Who left their umbrella?"

Mentioning semantic shift here doesn't seem to do anything but make me imagine you are grandpa Simpson yelling at passing clouds.

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

i'm totally grandpa simpson about this. "Literally" is literally a lost cause.

[-] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago

Gotten used to the singular they? Were you born in 900 or something? Seriously, the first written example we have of the singular they dates back to the 14th century.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] visc@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nothing happened to “literally”, its meaning is the same as always and it never means “figuratively”.

When people say “literally” to exaggerate, the word is part of the exaggeration, not describing the exaggeration.

They’re not literally “dead”, they’re “literally dead”. “Literally dead” is the state they exaggerate being in.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kazerniel@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

as the kids say, this sent me 💀

[-] procrastitron@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

My hot take: there’s no such thing as “singular they” because you don’t need a special case for using plural pronouns with a single person; the basic usage already allows that. The plural pronouns refer to a group of people of any size. That includes a group of size 1.

A group of only one person is still a group of people.

That’s why it has always been correct to refer to a single person using the plural pronouns; you’re not directly referring to the person but rather to the group consisting of just that one person.

The reason this confuses people isn’t because the usage is incorrect but rather because what they were taught is incorrect.

People are taught that plural pronouns only refer to more than one person and that has always been wrong.

To see why that’s wrong, consider what happens when the size of the group is neither exactly one or more than one. For example if the group is actually empty or if you don’t know how many people are in it.

In both those cases you need to use the plural pronoun.

If the plural pronouns are a valid choice for both a group of size zero and a group of size two, then it would be ridiculous to argue that they are not a valid choice for a group of size one.

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

"My pronouns are set P of unkown size."

[-] hansolo@lemmy.today 7 points 2 weeks ago

Hot take? That's simply not true.

From the Chicago Manual of Style:

5.51: Generic singular “they” Traditionally, a singular antecedent requires a singular pronoun. But even beforetheir, and themselves (or possibly themself) as generic singular forms—especially in speech and informal prose.

So, "They" is commonly used to refer to a singular person of unknown gender or sex. You'll see it in the news occasionally.

"An intruder wearing a chicken mascot costume was caught on video breaking into a bank. They stuffed their costume full of $100 bills before fleeing the scene."

Sure, writers will more likely not use pronouns at all, maybe saying "the assailant," but when a pronoun is used, "they" and "their" would be perfectly fine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] attempt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I get the sentiment but tits are plural, a better analogy is needed

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
698 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8707 readers
2260 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS