60
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HedyL@awful.systems 29 points 1 month ago

Stock markets generally love layoffs, and they appear to love AI at the moment. To be honest, I'm not sure they thought beyond that.

[-] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 22 points 1 month ago

This is pure speculation, but I get the feeling Microsoft's gonna significantly downsize, if not collapse, by the decade's end.

This recent move's gonna kneecap Microsoft's ability to function as a company, and their heavy investment into AI mean they'll likely take the brunt of the impact when the bubble bursts.

[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 9 points 1 month ago

This does sounds like doubling down on a bet.

[-] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 12 points 1 month ago

As a matter of fact, someone's noted Ed Zitron had called this back in September:

[-] mii@awful.systems 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There’s something I’ve been wondering about: is the management (of not just Microsoft but really any company who’s pivoting to AI this hard, so also Duolingo and Klarna, &c.) really convinced that there’s going to be a foom event soon and the chatbots become capable enough to actually do the work they attribute to them? Or do Nadella and friends know this is all bullshit and just play along until they can’t anymore and leave the sinking ship?

I honestly can’t tell anymore.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My take is that the Silicon Valley overlords live in a bubble, where they believe that.

[-] arbitraryidentifier@awful.systems 4 points 4 weeks ago

From the perspective of the company I work for (not a tech company, but has a pretty large development center) they truly believe that AI will 10x productivity. Not so much the FOOM stuff. Just typical Capitalism.

Standard Business Idiot nonsense. They don't actually understand the work that their company does, and so are extremely vulnerable to a good salesman who can put together a narrative they do understand that lets them feel like super important big boys doing important business things that are definitely worth the amount they get paid to do them.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

That's fine, they had a "make money by stepping over morals" philosophy from the very start.

[-] diz@awful.systems 5 points 4 weeks ago

That philosophy always ends in stepping into dogshit to try to boost stock prices.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Yeah, it's not sustainable long-term, but they're not in for it long-term anyway.

[-] diz@awful.systems 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm kind of dubious its effective in any term whatsoever, unless the term is "nothing works but we got a lot of it".

[-] fullsquare@awful.systems 13 points 1 month ago

but does the prospect of mass human sacrifice please The Line?

[-] maol@awful.systems 3 points 3 weeks ago

I should really start looking into Linux huh

this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
60 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2097 readers
128 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS