Baldur Bjarnason (who hates AI slop) has posited precisely this:

My current theory is that the main difference between open source and closed source when it comes to the adoption of “AI” tools is that open source projects generally have to ship working code, whereas closed source only needs to ship code that runs.

I asked Github Copilot and it added import wreak to .NET, so we'll get back to you.

Yes, I know, I wrote it. Why do you consider this useful to post here?

why did you post literally just the text from the article

yeah, I think that's enough

i love awful systems so much

The Register said in its Builder.AI obit that the company is really into making its devs use AI coding. lol.

ahem Little Big

new Ziz story, coupla days ago https://www.sfchronicle.com/crime/article/ziz-rationalism-lasota-pasek-20323332.php

also featuring our old friend Zack Davis

a shitload i expect. but checking authorities actually exist is probably gonna become an obvious thing to do lol

word i hear is that too many lawyers fucking love this shit, they see plausible words and think that's sufficient to ~~replace~~ supplement the office peons

then this happens to them and lol

If you're after streams-crossing - this guy is a rationalist who does Manifold Markets