757
submitted 9 months ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 75 points 9 months ago

Social Democracy is not the same as Socialism. But, I wasn’t following the race, maybe he does want the public to own the means of production.

[-] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 84 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I get the hesitation since in US politics they often get conflated and I can’t say I’ve followed him very closely but someone else shared this. I know he’s also advocating for city owned grocery stores.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 22 points 9 months ago

Quite a lot of red states have state owned liquor stores,[0] so city owned grocery stores doesn't sound that radical. Apparently, Atlanta is doing it.[1] I hadn't heard of this idea before, but web search shows it is a thing. I'd consider it socialism if he also wants to close down the privately run grocery stores. He doesn't seem to be doing that

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcoholic_beverage_control_state

[1] https://thefern.org/2025/03/are-government-owned-grocery-stores-the-answer-to-americas-food-desert-problem/

[-] grue@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Apparently, Atlanta is doing it.[1]

I'm an Atlantan and this is the first I'm hearing of it. Neat!

Reading the article, though, it's really just that the city is subsidizing a private business (and in one of the two cases, acting as its landlord) in order to create an incentive to open in a food desert, not actually getting into the business of operating a grocery store directly itself.

I mean, I got a loan from Invest Atlanta to help with the down payment on my house, but that doesn't mean the city owns my house or that it's some kind of 'government housing.'

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 15 points 9 months ago

From everything I’ve seen, yes, he’s an actual socialist.

[-] dermanus@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago

The word gets used so often as a pejorative it's weird to see it used accurately by that crowd.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm OK with it because maybe when they realize he's just a guy making decisions to help his community, it will remove a smidge of the ZOMG SOCIALISM reaction to folks like not only him, but also Bernie, and maybe others who might like to call themselves social democrats instead of democrats.

If Bernie and AOC start the social democrat party tomorrow with Mamdani and others, I'm registering before the ink is dry.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Also Democratic Socialism (Mamdani's beliefs) are not the same as Social Democracy. They are slightly different.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] robocall@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago

It's just a primary guys. Let's hope he wins the seat.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 48 points 9 months ago

If Cuomo runs 3rd party and the Dem establishment supports him, I'm going to fling that back at anyone who tells me to not vote 3rd party in a presidential election, lol.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

I'm going to flip out if the dems support Cuomo and I'm honestly half expecting them to

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 months ago

I'm fully expecting them to. The Dem leadership supporting an ACTUAL leftist is only SLIGHTLY more likely than them going full fascist and endorsing Curtis Sliwa..

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

half expecting

Sweet summer child.

[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 9 months ago

"Vote blue no matter who"

Mamdani wins historic primary victory

".....shit"

[-] tomenzgg@midwest.social 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You're going to fling that a high-profile and well-recognized (even amongst non-politically engaged voters) organization gave recognition and resources to a third party in a local (not even gubernatorial but) mayoral election as a counter defense for voting for a third party in a presidential election?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

If they do it against a progressive after making a huge deal about not doing it against a centrist? You may like that level of rank hypocrisy.

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 months ago

If Cuomo runs 3rd party

He's running as an independent, yes.

and the Dem establishment supports him

Unless they suddenly fall back in love with Adams or go full Sliwa, they will. They fight the left exactly as much as they accommodate the far right.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 9 months ago

It would take a catastrophe for him not to.

His opponents in the general are as follows:

  • The corrupt former governor sex pest he just beat, running as an independent in order to get a do-over

  • Current mayor in spite of being a hair's breath from prison until he went full MAGA, always being a fascist cop (but I repeat myself) and genuinely unhinged, Eric Adams

  • Perennial loser and hyper-racist vigilante lunatic Curtis Sliwa.

Not only are they all awful candidates in themselves, their core demographics also overlap to such a degree that it'll be an upset if more than one of them reaches double digits!

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 months ago

If NYC uses ranked choice voting in the general as well and Cuomo learns from his disaster of a campaign then he might try coalition-building with Eric Adams or others to pull off a win by getting neoliberals and MAGA to gang up on Zohran. It's a headscratcher for me because I never expect neoliberals to learn from their mistakes, and yet they might actually feel forced to because they never fail to pull out all the stops against progressives, let alone an actual socialist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kickforce@lemmy.wtf 9 points 9 months ago

Hey, nobody messes with the Zohran!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 54 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"Socialism" lol

It is a win though, it shows people are willing to vote for change ~~through alternative parties~~ and thats fucking huge

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 32 points 9 months ago

He's a Democrat, not 3rd party.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Shit I will amend that. Forgot he won the democratic primary. He is still heavily associated with DSA though and this is well known.

[-] mienshao@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

Because he had to run in the democratic primary in order to have a shot. He’s a member of the DSA tho—I feel like it’s disingenuous to call him just “a Democrat” (same with AOC)

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

AOC is a Democrat too, what is the issue? There are factions within the Democrats and she's in one of them but afaict she is nowhere near as radical as she was depicted as being. Part of that is from getting slapped around by the leadership I'm sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 28 points 9 months ago

They will rig the general. Look to the firms in control of the individual machines and the tabulation servers…

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Looks like Cuomo is planning to run as an independent to split the vote.

[-] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Considering Eric Adams already is running as an independent, Cuomo is more likely to siphon votes away from him. Although I think it will be ranked choice anyway, so "splitting" the vote won't really matter.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The general is FPTP. Adams and Cuomo can fight for attention, they share the same demographic of assholes

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] shawn1122@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

That's great that AIPAC had a backup plan

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 27 points 9 months ago

Apparently, Faux News calls him "Zohran the Destroyer". This is exactly the sort of name that I want with progressive leadership. 🤩

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

The number of opinion pieces having meltdowns over Mamdani is simply off the charts. The fascists and neolibs are losing their minds about this. It’s incredible.

Mamdani isn’t even remotely radical as far as leftists go. What’s he’s proposing is just the bare minimum of common sense as far as the rest of the world is concerned.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They're acting like Luigi broke out and started making the world a better place one capitalist at a time again.

allegedly

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

C'mon! Status Cuomo was right there!

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Keep talking in ways that highlight progressive values, and you'll get more of this.

[-] jsomae@lemmy.ml 10 points 9 months ago

He's quite charismatic.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago

No idea about Mamdani but does the election not mostly show that people hate Andrew Cuomo? He seemed awful.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 28 points 9 months ago

No, this campaign was everything you could ask for

His core platform - free and faster buses, free childcare, rent freezes, and no one making less than $1M will be paying for any of it

It's simple, it's hard to fear monger against, and it's things the people want. The best they had was "but he's Muslim"

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
757 points (100.0% liked)

News

37152 readers
2537 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS