757
submitted 10 months ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago

No idea about Mamdani but does the election not mostly show that people hate Andrew Cuomo? He seemed awful.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 28 points 10 months ago

No, this campaign was everything you could ask for

His core platform - free and faster buses, free childcare, rent freezes, and no one making less than $1M will be paying for any of it

It's simple, it's hard to fear monger against, and it's things the people want. The best they had was "but he's Muslim"

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

Thanks, interesting, but I wish him luck delivering on any of that.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

You can just skip the “but”. Other policy makers either horribly fail with their much shittier policies all the time and when they do succeed that’s still a problem because those are bad policies.

And don’t worry, a lot of that stuff has already been successful in better places so it shoukd go fine.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Ok fine. His platform is interesting and I wish him luck delivering on it.

Shitty policies are usually successful in the sense that they achieve or at least advance their (shitty) goals, fwiw. Are Mamdani's proposals serious (e.g. does he have financial projections for them), or are they like platitudes like wishing for world peace? Tbh I don't think the mayor has the authority to do any of that stuff.

We'll see how it goes.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Cities are often where these things start. To underestimate a mayor’s impact, especially in a city like New York, is not the play. It also sounds like you aren’t even that familiar with his platform since it took me only one simple google to find a couple examples of a costed plan.

The US is plenty happy electing people with zero plan whatsoever, and what they do have is easily disproven nonsense that has never, ever worked. Major cities and economies in the world have done, with success, what Mamdani is proposing.

For the love of god, just be happy that the United Shithole of America is finally taking a step in the right direction. It’s going to be ok, and it pretty much can’t be worse since even trying and failing would be better than purposefully destroying everything for a quick buck.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Well, we'll see what actually happens. NY has a history of chewing up mayors.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yea, their really shitty or barely mediocre mayors? This is very different from times before and I think it’s ok to be excited. If it does end up going wrong you need to know that being a massive pessimist just for the sake of the world’s most depressing “win” is not a healthy way to live. Plus, nothing is really pointing to this being a bad thing except your own evident misunderstanding of the situation.

I wish him all the best, and more than anything I hope that the federal government doesn’t sabotage him and I hope that even if they do people will be able to understand that instead of going “wow he failed! No I’m not going to think about it harder than that.”

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

massive pessimist just for the sake of the world’s most depressing “win” is not a healthy way to live.

Healthy cynicism my friend ;).

Plus, nothing is really pointing to this being a bad thing except your own evident misunderstanding of the situation.

I see a bunch of idealistic goals that don't look likely to survive contact with reality. But, like you, I wish him all the best as well.

Is the Green New Deal still around by the way? Same issue, more or less.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Literally these things have already been done with success. Your ignorance is not the definition of reality.

We know for a fact that housing people, keeping rent under control, and even offering free public transport all lead to a stronger economy and far better financial security for the 99%(which is even good for the 1% because it means people can actually buy their shit). This isn’t wishful thinking, it’s been tried in better places and the US is a perfect case study on why the centrist and right-wing ideas don’t work and have never worked.

You’re not a cynic, you’re poorly informed about the subject.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not doubting all that stuff is great if Mamdami can make it happen. I'm skeptical that he can make it happen, based on having seen this kind of thing before. Heck, he hasn't even won the mayoral election yet. I'd give him 50% chance of becoming mayor, based on remembering Lieberman for Connecticut. As for the other stuff, it's all vague enough to make it easy to claim victory, at least based on what you've posted here. So I'd want to see definite success criteria based on measurable results.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 5 points 10 months ago

Yes, he's the real deal. He has the math worked out, he's got a cohesive plan, he's made alliances, he's got a ton of energy behind him, and he just nails every interview - even hostile ones

Yes, it's going to be an uphill battle. There's going to be a ton of institutional resistance... But if he can force policies through anyways, it would so huge for the entire country

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago
[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

He has always been offal.

FTFY

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

and he was primiarly beeing pushed by republicans as a frontrunner, go figure.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
757 points (100.0% liked)

News

37314 readers
1383 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS