757
submitted 9 months ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 54 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"Socialism" lol

It is a win though, it shows people are willing to vote for change ~~through alternative parties~~ and thats fucking huge

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 32 points 9 months ago

He's a Democrat, not 3rd party.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Shit I will amend that. Forgot he won the democratic primary. He is still heavily associated with DSA though and this is well known.

[-] mienshao@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago

Because he had to run in the democratic primary in order to have a shot. He’s a member of the DSA tho—I feel like it’s disingenuous to call him just “a Democrat” (same with AOC)

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

AOC is a Democrat too, what is the issue? There are factions within the Democrats and she's in one of them but afaict she is nowhere near as radical as she was depicted as being. Part of that is from getting slapped around by the leadership I'm sure.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, he's not corporate enough. Let's kick him out. Why do we keep losing? Must be the progressives we keep insisting aren't welcome.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago

Cuomo is the third party candidate

It never makes sense to vote third party, according to what the blue maga have told me.

[-] Tillman@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Funny how the gop are calling him socialist when it’s they who have free healthcare and live off public money.

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

"socialism" in the sense of the french revolution, where they executed lots of people with the guillotine, must never happen again.

The problem with killing people is that it's a lot like eating potato chips: Once you start, it's impossible to stop.

Look at the Reign of Terror that immediately followed the French Revolution. They basically continued to kill people after all of the nobles were gone. These actions discouraged a lot of people and were one big factor that scared potential revolutionaries in other countries away from trying a revolution in their home country as well.

Take the rich's resources, but don't kill them.
"Tax the rich", not "eat the rich".
That is socialism for the 21st century.

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The french revolution, atleast the one you are referring to, was a bourgeois revolution and decidedly not socialist. It was the rising merchant class overthrowing the feudal class structures that held back their ability to obtain capital. It was not the proletariat overthrowing the capitalist class structures which hold us back. If you try and take property from the rich they will kill you for it. This has been endlessly proven throughout history, every workers revolution has a violent counter revolution from the bourgeois. Will you roll over and take it? Or will you defend yourself and the revolution?

[-] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 2 points 9 months ago

I have seen too many rich assholes actually go to jail, then just get out a few years later and continue the same grift.

Fuck this softy nonsense.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
757 points (100.0% liked)

News

37152 readers
2492 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS