1127
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago

Hey guys, there is a lot of troll baiting in this thread. You've been doing a great job of not falling for it, so I'm not going to lock it. Newbies to this thread, check the times of when it was made and if it brings up the distant past a lot, those are good clues. Leave one comment at most to save everyone's sanity.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 160 points 1 month ago

Which the Democrats should absolutely fucking do regardless of whether The Republicans will vote to convict, which of course they won’t, but the point is, we can’t just sit back and do nothing. We have to at least show that we’re willing to take the steps that are necessary to dissent.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 98 points 1 month ago

Trump has already been impeached.

Twice.

The last time he was president.

It doesn't matter anymore.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

And became a felon after that.

[-] Zorsith 30 points 1 month ago

Shortly before becoming president for the second time.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago

And winning the popular vote this time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 month ago

The cop at the protest yawns, unslings his 40mm LMT™ weapon, loads another rubber bullet into it, looks around the crowd for another reporter, aims, and shoots her in the head.

Idealistic youngling: "Wow, that cop just shot a woman in the head with a rubber bullet, he could totally be charged for that!"

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Americans are cowards. Period.

The constitutional right to be ARMED TO THE TEETH and they’re all pissing their pants in fear of… losing their jobs? They literally sat there, watched the worst of humanity seize power, and spent their political capital trying to limit their ability to fight back.

They deserve whatever they get.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] psud@aussie.zone 11 points 1 month ago

After "shoots her in the head" you forgot "poses for the cameras"

[-] darthelmet@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago

I wish I still lived in the fantasy world where this was plausible.

[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 8 points 1 month ago

It still is in many countries around the globe. Please don't give up hope, it is not a sign of naivety!

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That ship has sailed decades ago. The US hasn't been officially at war since 1945, and the congress has for all intents and purposes gave up on that power.

[-] falynns@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

The speed Congress gave up their constitutional powers to avoid repurcusions for having opinions and voting for them is crazy. But I guess being able to give yourself a raise every year for doing nothing is tempting.

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

To be fair to the US Congress (AFAIK) no one as been formally at war since 1945 - and unless I'm forgetting anything it would actually make the US Congress the last ones to declare war on anyone.

Since WW2 everything is framed as a peacekeeping mission (when approved even if only implicitly by the UN Security Council), a civil war, helping the legitimate government in a civil war (US in Vietnam or Soviet Union in Afghanistan for example), or when every other excuse fails a pre-emptive special military operation (US in Iraq, Russia in Ukraine, Israel in all of their neighbours + Iran).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rpa@europe.pub 34 points 1 month ago

I remember all it took was some jizz...

[-] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

Now we have an actual cum stain running this shit show

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

To be fair, Clinton did take advantage of an intern in a relationship where the power dynamic meant there could never be meaningful consent, and then he lied about it under oath.

Two things can be true: it was a political hit job where they were just out to get Clinton on anything they could. But also, Clinton did a shitty thing, was caught, then lied about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BubbaGumpsBackLumps@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah lets impeach the already twice impeached president, surely third times the charm... right guys ?

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mrslt@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Oh, you mean like how he was impeached in his first term in office and nothing changed?

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Both impeachments were acquitted by the Senate after the House passed them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 24 points 1 month ago

The corruption of our nation is absolute.

The president is a Nazi.

Thr people working for him are Nazis.

They are carrying out a Nazi agenda.

They are illegally starting wars illegally kidnapping Americans and illegally using our own armed forces against us.

The time for resistance is passed.

It’s time for survival.

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago

No. No this is about the time for resistance. We shouldn't just skip that one

[-] witten@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Exactly. I'm so tired of this doomer "we've tried nothing and it hasn't worked" stance on the Trump regime. RESIST, people!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 month ago

Only impeachment that will matter is a vigilante with better aim

[-] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In 2001 when The US authorized use of force on Al-Qaeda that, along with The 1973 war powers resolution gave the president (as in the position of president, not just Bush) unlimited ability to bomb anyone loosely associated with Al-Qaeda in perpetuity.

It's what allowed Bush, then Obama, then Trump, and then Biden, and now Trump again, to use the military as they see fit for performing military operations against basically any state and group in the middle east.

This is sadly likely the least impeachable thing he's done in office.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago

I see two outcomes:

  • Congress introduces articles
  • Impeached, but fails ratification in senate

or

  • Congress introduces articles
  • Some terrible tragedy befalls us or Israel
  • Articles fail and congress backs the war full-throated

There is no version of this that ends in removal, and even impeachment wouldn't be anything more than performative outrage.

The majority of sitting representatives have been waiting for an acceptable excuse to bomb Iran for decades. The only objection any of them have is doing so without manufacturing consent from voters first, but we've already seen how this plays out with Afghanistan. They'll drum up dubious evidence of WMD's and launch their entry, and then spend 20 years trying to 'get out' while securing Iran's material resources on the way.

The only difference this time is that Iran has almost 5x the population and 100x the GDP of Afghanistan in 2001, plus an actual organized military base with proper advanced weapons manufacturing. There's a reason we've waited this long to actually do this, and it isn't because we were busy doing other things. It's because this isn't a war we can win without pulling everyone else into it (or at the very least without isolating them from global trading partners).

It's not a morbid joke to call this a WWIII softlaunch.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

Oop, that's another impeachable offense in the pile.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aramova@infosec.pub 17 points 1 month ago
[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

If that dude knew how to fucking aim

[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago

Lol, no it isn't. Ever since Cold War times, the law has been that the president can not only launch missiles, but even deploy troops on the ground, without congressional approval. There's a limit on how long the troops can be deployed, iirc, but once you've started a ground invasion it's a bit late.

Obviously it's unconstitutional, but there's no legal precedent that would say so. If you think this is the first time this has happened, you really need to learn more about history. The US never formally declared war on Vietnam, for example.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Isn't the president allowed 90 days before congress is required?

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Yes, also he didn't declare war. Anyone old enough to remember 9-11 knows what is up.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

They're coming right at us, Jimbo!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 1 month ago

Sorry, you can only be impeached for getting a beej (although that was creepy af from an intern) or wearing a tan suit.

Starting wars just won't do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Can we impeach him out of a cannon?

Into the sun?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Not sure who still isn't getting this.

There is a literal American traitor in the Oval Office. One who has flagrantly violated the law, and specifically the Constitution, numerous times.

Impeachment is meaningless, as we've witnessed multiple times in American history. Impeachment is an acceptable process if the violation is minimal and not repeated. It's a slap on the wrist. A warning.

We are WAY beyond a symbolic slap on the wrist with no real repercussions. Impeachment is not a valid tool to use in a situation like this. At minimum, we are at the point where there needs to be massive protests like we just saw, repeatedly, until he is removed from office. If that fails, then there needs to be a general strike until he's removed. If that fails, then he needs to be removed from office by force.

If we can't manage these things, we will continue seeing the degradation of our freedoms, the collapse of our economy, the destruction of our founding document, signaling the end of our democracy, and the hole we'll end up finding ourselves in will be one we won't see this country come out of for the remainder of our lives.

It is time to remove this traitor and his treasonous enablers from their positions of power.

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago

i hate the fucking united states

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

impeachment shmimshmeashment, i want a conviction and an escort out of the building

[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 9 points 1 month ago

not with the house in the hands of republicans.

Best hope there is enough democracy left in the US to swing it back to the Dems in 2026.

And even then, without a comfortable majority for the Dems in the senate it will just be another impeachment to add to the pile, no conviction.

They don't call him teflon don for no reason

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1127 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

7835 readers
864 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS