775
Anon likes trains (sh.itjust.works)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

The cost of dedicated passenger rail lines is staggering, and the US has a LOT of ground to cover.

[-] InfiniteHench@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

I’m a huge train and transit advocate and I try to take Amtrak every chance I get. But “tickets are cheaper” does not feel like a blanket statement we can make. Maybe on very specific, usually short legs, like Chicago to Milwaukee. Someone correct me if I’m wrong or there’s more nuance but once a trip goes past 3 or 5+ hour mark, the price seems to skyrocket past airfare.

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago

I really really wish I wasn't American

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 7 hours ago

This again? The answer is no one knows. We heard legends about it but the prophecy says line go up!

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

Is there any parody porn about TSA? I want to masturbate to it. As long as it's not too noncon (like TSA in real life), I don't really care about the details (I'm ok with any gender, large insertions/fisting, etc.).

[-] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 hours ago

Is there any parody porn about [a thing]?

Yes. The answer is always yes.

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 12 points 8 hours ago

TSA exists, therefore...

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 17 points 10 hours ago

Honestly I think it's just sticker shock. I would say that as soon as we get some people would be more willing to get more, but no, because people are hesitant to expand existing rail. MARTA please expand, I beg you. Oh great spirits of public transit, I pray that you soften the NIMBYs' hearts.

It's so upsetting that every small town in my state has an old historic train stop but none of them are actually passenger train stops anymore. Once you see it you can't unsee it. I am 15 minutes from my town's historic train stop which is a steak house now. My parents are about the same distance from theirs, probably even closer, but it's a museum or something. Can I just take a walk to the train, ride down, and see them? Nope. Gotta deal with the hellscape that is metro Atlanta traffic.

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 9 hours ago

soften nimby hearts

They can soften the nimbys' hearts, but ill take them cooked to charcoal if that's what it takes.

[-] TheFerrango@lemmings.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Glorious coal for scenic steam locomotives. It’s a win-win

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago

Still cleaner than even the cleanest electric car, just by physics.

[-] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

In theory, you could make a carbon-neutral coal-burning steam locomotive. You would need to make synthetic coal out of atmospherically-captured CO2. But in theory it would be possible...

[-] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 52 points 13 hours ago

Americans can't do trains because it requires public infrastructure (rails), which apparently we are allergic to.

[-] kieron115@startrek.website 24 points 12 hours ago

I've read articles in the past about high speed trains and/or just new train lines in general would get held up by little towns who didn't want to lose the commuter traffic since it was the only thing keeping them afloat. There are too many towns that exist literally just to serve motorists and now nobody wants to get rid of them.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago

Anybody who is making money off existing transportation is going to be against public transportation. Cab companies lobby against rail everywhere, from city to burbs or airport to downtown. Trucking, for obvious reasons. Passenger rail can carry cargo at night. And of course anybody selling fuel to the mass of cars, the petro industry.

[-] dmention7@lemm.ee 6 points 9 hours ago

That is so odd... I've only ridden Amtrak a few times, but I was amazed at how many stops were just some small town that happened to lie on the rail line.

Most small towns that lie on a major highway and are supported by commuter traffic are only going to support a truck stop and a few fast food restaurants at best. Sure, a true high speed rail line would likely only stop in larger metropolitan areas, so those meager income sources may dwindle. But on the other hand if I were a rail commuter in one of those rural/suburban areas, I'd be much more likely to spend some time doing a bit of shopping or lingering in a restaurant during that transition from the train to my car after work, than if I were just passing through in my car.

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 hours ago

If i had a 24/7 high speed line to the big city from fuvkoffnowhere, i might choose to live in fuvkoffnowhere

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 hours ago

They are just very short sighted. Just lobby to have a station and a have commuter stops and people will flock to those "cheaper" areas to live bringing in tons of tax revenue and boosting the local economy.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 28 points 11 hours ago

Americans can't do high speed rail because we have aircraft, automobile, and petroleum industries who don't want us to.

[-] callyral@pawb.social 7 points 7 hours ago

ah, the free market

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 hours ago

Exactly!

In the words of someone who decided to not stop 9/11:

You dont fuck with billion dollar corporations.

[-] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 15 points 11 hours ago

Cheaper? come to the UK, where flying can be less expensive than rail

[-] Johanno@feddit.org 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

A rail system is expensive, but the alternatives are even more expensive. The roads cost more to maintain and fuck do i know how planes keep getting cheaper. Maybe no tax and city funding?

[-] serenissi@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

You guys pay to get railed in UK?

[-] festnt@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

woah i wouldn't pay for that

[-] Cattail@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

Yeah i got used to TSA sexually assulting me just to get to the to my plane

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 9 hours ago

And you'd miss it, right?

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 17 points 13 hours ago

Why would Americans care about trains when they're gonna be a billionaire any day now and have their own private jet?

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 27 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Meanwhile, right wing parties in Quebec are fighting against a tramway project in Quebec city, that the entire country agreed to pay for, for which we have already invested half a billion, build stations, etc. They call it "War on cars".

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] slingstone@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Doesn't Europe have an extensive passenger train network?

Also, I recently rode on Amtrak for a long trip from Columbia, SC to Baltimore, MD. This was my first time on any kind of train other than a subway or metro line. It had its drawbacks (incredibly long travel time and delays), but I always felt safe, and I had a lot more room than I would have had on any flight. The major drawbacks where the seats were somewhat uncomfortable and things like that are largely due to the fact that the cars were pretty old, and not inherent to train travel if it was properly maintained. The cost was much less, and the free parking was such a great bonus.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 hours ago

Also, I recently rode on Amtrak for a long trip from Columbia, SC to Baltimore, MD. This was my first time on any kind of train other than a subway or metro line. It had its drawbacks (incredibly long travel time and delays)

I thought about taking an Amtrak to Boston for a trip since it was a vacation and I wasn't in a huge rush travel wise. By "incredibly long travel time" in my case it would have gone from ~3 hours (two roughly one hour flights with a very short layover you've got to haul ass through because for some reason the relevant gates are both at the far ends of different concourses at Dulles) to about a day. Wasn't in a rush, but that's a bit too far to the other extreme.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
775 points (100.0% liked)

Greentext

6525 readers
1320 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS