If the cops did indeed plant evidence then happy days for the defence since it should be easy to disprove. e.g. by simple handwriting analysis or other such means. But this is fantasy wishful thinking since he did write the words. So stick to the reality here
Handwriting analysis is hardly objective.
He shot the guy and confessed to it.
He's pleaded not guilty, and unless you have more up to date information, he's made no confession outside of the alleged note.
Ultimately, there is a better strategy to jury nullification:
https://beyondcourts.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/Jury-Nullification-Toolkit-English_0.pdf
TL;DR: It is most effective to plant seeds of doubt when reasonable, and legitimate ones. For this particular case, it would be the fact that the eyebrows don't match between pictures, the police said they had found the backpack in NY only to then say they found him with his backpack at McDonalds, the fact that Luigi claims shit was planted on him and the police have a running history of planting evidence to suit their needs, etc.
While it won't help you getting suicided, setting up a deadman's switch on the cloud that will release your testimony is definitely worth doing.
And that's why we fight back where we can and weaponize what we can; that's why we use jury nullification in cases like these.
It wasn't Luigi.
Geneally, you don't become a CEO without being a shitty person, and therefore a shitty parent.
The mechanism is irrelevant. Murder is still murder even if through insurance denials, pollution, or any other bullshit legal ways of killing people.
Abolish the monarchy
I'm all for it, though does anybody know a good place to find these unwanted machines?
Agreed. If they both had heart attacks tomorrow I would be glad to not hear about them anymore.
He's pleading not guilty, claiming that the cops planted that shit.
And the cops routinely lie and plant evidence, so it's not out of the question.
Very nice build, I love it