1481
president of peace everybody (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 month ago by not_IO to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 179 points 1 month ago

Ok, so he breaks the law, AGAIN… that’ll be how many times? And how many consequences? And how will he be punished? Who will punish him? Remember, this is an insurrectionist that the administration from 17-21 did not go after because it would have been “taken as political”. So, again, who cares what the law says, because he doesn’t.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago

Trump has already been impeached twice. What else could they do except attempt to remove him from power, and with what army?

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 63 points 1 month ago

Uh, my point exactly. Mother fucker thinks he’s untouchable because he is. The GOP have kneecapped our democracy to the point that if you are in power, you can do whatever the fuck you want.

[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Didnt the supreme court decide that a president can do whatever if its an "official act"?

Edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXQ43yyJvgs

[-] Sc00ter@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Being impeached doesnt inherently carry consequences.

If you think of it like a trial, the house delivers the guilty verdict (impeachment), and the senate determines the sentencing. The senate basically said, "yea so what? No consequences"

If the senate would do their job too, impeachment would mean something

[-] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

I think that at this point people should settle on the fact that the only consequences Trump will ever face is in a history book 30 years after WW3/Civil War 2.

Well except in the Reconstruction States because there will be a number of lies that will endure forever, similar to the Lost Cause and Stabbed in the Back myths.

[-] not_IO 5 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org 60 points 1 month ago

I mean, the Constitution of the United States is also very clear the fucker wasn't eligible to BE President again, but we all seem to have just shimmied right past that as well.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 25 points 1 month ago

Do you mean because of the insurrection? I think there's something in that part about Congress needing to do something too, so Congress dropped the ball on that.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

The DoJ was a big help too

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago

Congress has been shirking their responsibility to declare wars since the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964. They gave Presidents the power to carry out military actions abroad without a formal declaration. By passing the responsibility on to the president, Congress gets to avoid the blame for unpopular wars.

Even the Vietnam "War" which lasted 10 years, was never declared by Congress.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 month ago

Bernie should be aware of the war powers act. It's one of the worse pieces of legislation ever, but it makes the whole declare war thing largely meaningless.

The act gives a president the ability to perform military actions provided Congress is notified within 48 hours of the action happening. Then the president gets a free 60 days to do whatever without additional approval. Then there's a further 30 days where forces should be withdrawing if there is no further congressional approval. However, that timeline doesn't really matter, as the Supreme Court ruled under Clinton that of troops are gone by the time the case gets to them then it doesn't really matter that the law was violated.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 36 points 1 month ago

"It's illegal"

Someone remind him that the supreme court has judged that the usa president can do any crime willy nilly

[-] DoubleSpace@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Trump clearly demonstrated over decades that he is unable to not break laws, and he was arguably elected because of that. Therefore, the most democratic thing would be to let him be a dictator. 🤷

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 month ago

Remember Vietnam?

The president has the power to deploy the military even without a declaration

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah unfortunately that is not actually the way the law is written Bernie. Wish it was.

Short version, the president gets to deploy the military where ever he wishes (outside the US, posse comitatus etc). That includes invading a sovereign nation or raining missiles down on one.

Only congress has the power to declare a war, but the Potus gets to defacto kick off the war and then dare congress not to back him.

After it was either 60 or 90 days, I forget, congress gets to "review" the decision, the problem is they have no power other than financial if they wish to stop the war. So the only thing they can do is turn off the finances to the military, and wait for the money to run out - which is generally up to a year. They have no way of forcing the president to desist other than impeachment or cutting off the funds.

They can pass a motion, or even legislation, which the Prez can then veto, pointless. If they can muster the 2/3rds of congress they can remove him via impeachment.

Edit, spelling correction and to note that I can pull out the full details if needed - was discussed heavily on reddit a while ago

[-] polle@feddit.org 26 points 1 month ago

Its like choosing the president is a really important decision.

[-] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 month ago

But genocidal Kamala is just as bad! I was informed about it multiple times by accounts on .ml (and not all of them are operating exclusively during Moscow working hours)

[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm sorry, do you have a magical alternate reality viewer that shows Kamala not doing the same exact thing except whinging along the way about "working tirelessly" to avoid the thing that is currently happening with zero repercussions for the aggressor state... ? Come on, don't forget the president that kept warning about non-existent red lines as Palestinians were being (and still are!) slaughtered by the thousands, and literally bypassed congress to send munitions to Israel despite this. Y'know, the thing that will now be super bad when Trump does it?

At least we & our government officials don't have to pretend this is fucking normal just because the president is super duper apologetic about it and pinky promises that they care about all the lives involved but conspicuously only mentioning the ones belonging to the aggressor nation!!!1!

[-] prole 6 points 1 month ago

same exact thing

Yeah no.

[-] RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Biden/Harris would have done something similar to defend Israel from the consequences of its actions. Biden did bomb Yemen after all when it tried to stop the genocide. Biden is a self admitted Zionist and defended Israel’s invasion of Lebanon and supported the invasion of Iraq. Harris did nothing to distance herself from him.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Corn@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago
[-] meowMix2525@lemm.ee 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sounds like more should have been done to prevent trump even getting on the ballot while his opposition was still in power. Oh wait, but then they couldn't run on "trump bad" and would actually have to champion something for the people to get their votes. Oh well!

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yup. Someone has to be the ultimate commander of the military. Unfortunately (at least right now) POTUS is the commander in chief of the military.

So while his actions may not be a formal declaration of war, they certainly can cause a foreign nation to declare war on the USA.... Which simply pulls the US into a state of war regardless.

Can you guys not vote convicted felons suffering from dementia into the white house?

That would be great....

Sincerely, a Canadian.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago

Actually, the constitution IS ambiguous in how it defines war. If it weren't so ambiguous, presidents wouldn't be able to take advantage of the War Powers Act so easily - as they have done for decades.

The US hasn't declared war since WWII despite both red and blue presidents dropping untold bombs since then. The hubbub about Trump unilaterally carrying out "military action" is less about scary orange man, and more about an executive branch that has been concentrating power for decades under red and blue presidents alike. This, like many other things, is something that leftists have been sounding alarm bells about for ages.

Stop elevating the Constitution. It is an extremely weak, vague, and antiquated document that was written almost exclusively by 20 something, white, enslaving, landowing white males. I know of no other constitution that explicitly enshrines the right to enslave people. The US constitution is an embarrassment, and its no surprise its getting torn to shreds once the first unabashedly fascist shows up.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Pepperidge Farms remembers "police action" in Vietnam

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thoughtfuldragon 6 points 1 month ago

Really it's surprising it took this long.

[-] bieren@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 month ago

If they haven’t noticed. Trump does whatever the fuck he wants. If he ignores the ruling of courts, do they think he will read a post on X and be like “oh shit, you’re right.” No, posts on X are fucking useless. He will ignore congress like he does everything else. His ego is severely damaged after the little parade and leaders not worshipping him at G7. He is realizing his place in the food chain and looking for a win to boost his ego.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 23 points 1 month ago

Come on it is not a war, but a special military operation....

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 22 points 1 month ago

Went thru the same shit with Bush 20 years ago.

[-] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago

Diaper Don gonna order brown people to get bombed so he 'looks like a tough man".

Fuck that guy and everyone who voted for him. Or chose not to vote. Fuck you even more.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

I mean I'm not sure what to say to anyone that still thinks the Constitution is something the United States actually adheres to.

It's null and void the minute it gets violated at the highest levels of government with no repercussions and we've already crossed that line multiple times.

The Constitution is not valid anymore. The first step is to accept that fact. We're not going to get anywhere endlessly debating a document that isn't taken seriously by the ones capable of enforcing its mandates.

[-] tisktisk@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago

There are 0 rules that explicitly state they apply to the rich (enough)

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately our Constitution isn’t worth the paper its gift shop reproductions are printed on. Unfortunately, it’s been that way for a long, long time.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

GWB : Hold mah beer.

[-] Fontasia@feddit.nl 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

After watching some of the footage on Saturday, it's annoying to think "these are the people who will need to pull off a coup?"

[-] Bluewing@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

The POTUS has a window of discretion where he can act unilaterally without congressional approval. And they ALL have done so over many terms.

The hard stop is when congress needs to appropriate funds to pay for the war/police action.

[-] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Maybe we need to take away those powers and put Congress in control.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Professorozone@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

OMG that's hilarious. We haven't declared war since WWII. But how many presidents have done just that? Good luck with that argument.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

He's not wrong. Definition of genocide and war crimes are also pretty clearly enshrined. As are our countries laws against funding them.

[-] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

yhea, Have you seen the news?

rule of law is dead in the US

[-] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Oh. He must not.

And you're going to stop him, right?

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 7 points 1 month ago

Keep pissing into the wind, Bernie.

[-] ZMonster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Well, we're waiting, any day now, determine away you useless feckless fuck.

[-] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

He’s. it useless. He’s just alone. AOC and him are the only Democrats speaking out throughout this whole shit show

[-] Gowron_Howard@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

He’ll do what he wants without consequence, whine about it online as if he’s somehow the victim, and then continue to break more laws.

[-] IckabodKobain@feddit.online 5 points 1 month ago

What a sweet old man.

[-] bieren@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

“I don’t care what that old paper says” -Trump

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
1481 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8828 readers
1686 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS