202
submitted 1 week ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/lgbtq_plus
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] oftheair 62 points 1 week ago

Please please please stop using corporate social media for organising and events, it locks out people who care about privacy, they have to go searching instead of just being told what happens, and it's just generally a bad experience all around.

[-] bownage@beehaw.org 26 points 1 week ago

I can't wrap my head around the fact that my fav techno club which prides itself on being oh so queer oriented and inclusive uses Facebook to announce their events. In the year of our lord 2025??? Facebook???? For queer shit????????????

[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

For any shit IMO. Facebook a festering hole now, designed to spread hate and monitor people. I quit over 10yrs ago and I am an actual boomer. If this old fart can quit anyone can.

[-] oftheair 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I've seen so many queer things use Facebook or Instagram and it's baffling.

[-] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Plausible explanation - they want more reach. If you use something as ubiquitous as FB/IG, more people are going to read your page. Region dependents ofc

[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Hmmm, that did not work out so well did it. Cant send much info to your venue with your accounts toasted.

[-] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're reading their statement about it though.

You can't have huge reach without using shit tier corporate media. Not yet anyway. People are used to things they're used to, it's not exactly rocket science. Make backups elsewhere and encourage people to follow you there, that's the sensible option imo.

edit: unless you're willing to limit reach from day 1, I'm sure there are orgs like that

[-] obsidianfoxxy7870 3 points 1 week ago

I know same with many many many other type of "activist" organizations. Like some Anarchist that wanted me to follow there Instagram. I have a lack of faith in your views if you are still on Instagram or similar.

[-] oftheair 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, same to be honest. It just doesn't make any sense to us how one or many can be an anarchist(s) and not despise corporate social media etc.

[-] transebding_the_binary 1 points 1 week ago

As a temparary solution there is a frontend called imginn where you can see the stories and posts whithout an account. now no idea how trustworthy that front end is but ive been using for a while

[-] oftheair 1 points 1 week ago

:o Thanks so much! May we have a link please?

[-] transebding_the_binary 3 points 1 week ago

https://imginn.com/

there is also a firefox extension

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/imginn/

Imginn by gxvwb who also has other extensions that use other front ends for other social media.

like redlib or proxitok etc

[-] oftheair 2 points 1 week ago
[-] transebding_the_binary 1 points 1 week ago
[-] oftheair 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hmm, sadly without adblockers, as is not avaliable in some places, it seems to be full of ads.

[-] transebding_the_binary 1 points 6 days ago

well shit i did not notice that since I use Ublock origin as an adblock

[-] oftheair 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah, someone else we showed it to doesn't have an adblocker on one of their devices and instantly they got hounded with ads.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 week ago

Most likely, anti-pride users kept reporting the page until a bored, or homophobic, moderator finally approved the reports. Another possibility is Meta are replacing all moderation with AI. In both cases, this is still on Meta since this directly comes from the degrarion of protection of DEI groups.

[-] copygirl 9 points 1 week ago

Hasn't it become standard practice for mass-reports on big social media platforms to automatically shut down accounts and content, with human moderators (sometimes) undoing such after the fact?

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago

Zuck has explicitly said they are reducing moderation and relying more on user reports, so....

[-] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Could also be that reports reached a critical mass, and it was automatically taken down for human review.

[-] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Zuckerberg is trying so hard to be as hated as Musk.

[-] Dave2 8 points 1 week ago

Could the government have a role in this? Because I wholeheartedly believe if they could they would.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
202 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

3686 readers
19 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS