526
Zionists (don't) rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/onehundredninetysix
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago

Yeah fascist calling you a bad name is kind of a badge of honor

[-] kittenzrulz123 117 points 1 day ago

As a Jewish person I have personally experienced more antisemitism and general hate from zionists than any antizionist

ANTIZIONISM =/= ANTISEMITISM

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

In my final years on the right, I've read a Hungarian blog post titled "Unpopular opinion: the answer to the Jewish question is Israel", and it not only begun with the worst "I'm not antisemitic, some great people were Jewish, but" (except multiple paragraphs), but also talked about how Jewish people are unfit to "live alongside with non-Jews", and that the solution to all of it to let Israel have all of Palestine and maybe some other smaller Arabic countries as their population can just live in other countries like Saudi-Arabia (the same blog also regularly whined about the Treaty of Trianon, so...), and then the "peaceful deportations" can begin.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 hours ago

It makes sense that racists who think humanity should be divided along racial lines would be broadly in agreement with each other, even when they are on different sides of those lines. It's up to the rest of us to see through the lie that those divisions are the actual sides, when of course there is also pro-ethnostate and anti-ethnostate.

[-] FatCrab@lemmy.one 7 points 22 hours ago

A lidel an' alte fun undzere sonim "A geto deym eybigen Jid!"

Effectuvely translates to:

An old story we've heard from our enemies, "A ghetto for the eternal kyke!"

  • In Zaltsikn Yam, S. Ansky, ~1901

Never let a zionist lie to you that it was ever consensus among Jews to relocate to a new ghetto.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 8 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, I have no problem with any people in general. But I've got lots and lots of problems with Jews, Muslims, Russians, Belgians, the Swiss, Kenyans, brunettes, Inuits or anyone else when they decide to invade countries for the purposes of removing their people and moving in their own.

[-] koper@feddit.nl 65 points 1 day ago

Like when the ADL defended Musk's Hitler salute and added that "all sides should give one another a bit of grace".

The first 20 seconds of this documentary are a good example of "what makes you cheer".

Yaay! War! Guns! Tanks!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iq6J7Q6L0yw

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I only came around to see it a few days ago. How do these people not realize the insanity of it all? Going to an university event and fake crying on stage how you would feel threatened on campus by a motion for the university to stop investing in weapons manufacturers because your handlers told you to do it. Events where you kept being told to go to the army is the greatest way you could serve your people...

No matter what is going on in the world. My security in a place simply does not depend on that place having investments in my favorite weapons manufacturers. If that was the case for any human anywhere in the world that human would never be able to leave his home. Which in the case of American Zionists would be a good thing. Stay at home in Michigan, Ohio or wherever you life and don't go stealing other peoples homes halfway across the globe. Or go wherever you want in the world as long as you buy or rent from the legitimate owner.

[-] hungryphrog 20 points 1 day ago

Those are implied imo, considering there is no war, just slaughter.

[-] Smorty 8 points 1 day ago

oki i litrlli do nt kno whad thad means. whos a zionist n why wud ... ergghhhh forget it---

[-] HappyFrog 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Zionists are people who support the ethnic state that is Israel. A large portion of Zionists are Christian Evangelicals from the US.

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

It's worth pointing out that the reasons they support Israel as an ethnostate are largely two-fold

  1. They believe that a restored Jewish state in Palestine is a sign of Jesus's return, meaning they'll get raptured soon.

  2. They want Jewish people out of "their" country.

Zionism has a long history of antisemitism despite the apparent contradiction.

[-] gobbles_turkey@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I dont give two shites about "antisemitism". The word has become meaningless. It just means "whatever the zionists want".

Zionists really don't like this but it is true. By calling everyone who doesn't agree with you an "antisemite" to strike fear and/or silence them, it is bleaching the word and taking away its meaning and less people will recognize or respect the word for its real meaning. It's not good.

[-] HappyFrog 16 points 1 day ago

Exactly, many Nazis also find the idea of sending jews to the desert to be a preferable way of "dealing" with them. Fascists supporting fascists I suppose.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 21 points 1 day ago

The vast majority of Zionists are Christian Evangelicals from the US.

That's not true; Europe has pretty sizeable numbers too, and supposed liberal Zionists exist all over the West in large numbers. Screw them all, but let's not pretend Zionists only have sway with one religious group.

[-] HappyFrog 9 points 1 day ago

Sorry, fixed it.

[-] hungryphrog 6 points 1 day ago

Zionism is often defined as the belief that the state of Israel should exist. Zionists tend to have strong anti-Palestinian sentiments and support atrocities against them.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago

Zionism is a political movement whichs objects have changed over the course of its 150 years existence. Most early Zionists, even the vile ones who embraced ethnic cleansing as crucial to obtain "their" state had their goals fulfilled in 1948. Ever since then the movement kept radicalizing to keep justifying more ethnic cleansing, land stealing, genocide and assorted crimes that come with being an expansionist imperial ideology.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 11 points 23 hours ago

Most early Zionists, even the vile ones who embraced ethnic cleansing as crucial to obtain "their" state had their goals fulfilled in 1948.

Yeah... no. Ben Gurion is on record saying "we should accept partition as an intermediary step towards Jewish conquest of all of Palestine" multiple times. Zionism has always been like this; Zionists have simply deluded themselves and everyone else into thinking early Zionism wasn't exactly the same stuff as modern Zionism, just with better PR and more democracy for the master race. The reason Zionists didn't conquer and ethnically cleanse all of Palestine is Arab intervention to stop exactly that from happening.

this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
526 points (100.0% liked)

196

3202 readers
2151 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS