That is for state officials whose duty it is to ensure that only qualified persons are on the ballot to enforce. Indeed, if those state officials refuse or neglect to enforce the US Constitution, they could be held personally responsible.

The language specifically does not require any conviction. A conviction would make 14A S3 undeniably apply, but a lack of conviction doesn't make it not apply.

It doesn't say "convicted of...".

I doubt they put every Confederate on trial. Still I imagine there must be some court ruling for this to be the case. IANAL but a state court may make this decision and bar him from running in their state.

The amendment does not require formal conviction of a crime, and after the Civil War it was used extensively without formal convictions.

And obviously we’d support that if Hillary Clinton or Joe Biden tried to stage a coup. Would sort of insane bozo would still support a candidate after that?

We should definitely respect the judicial process.

... But I'd absolutely support this if Biden or Hilary were in the same situation.

They're telling you that it isn't written to require criminal guilt determined by a court.

The entire south seceded. Those people were not tried, and in fact were given blanket pardons. But they still couldn't hold office again.

This is a political process. It will be political, same as an impeachment.

Trump was literally dancing during the insurrection and there is a video of it. Dude was gleefully happy about one of the darkest days in American history.

It's not jumping the gun, you just have your head in the sand.

It doesn't say found guilty. Read the Constitution. It's plain.

If it is true that either of them "engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the [United States], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof," then yes.