270

Somebody start running against this asshat now.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Calling it now, Fetterman is going to switch parties.

Maybe not soon, but someday.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

He barely needs to at this point.

[-] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 152 points 3 days ago

Fetterman is the poster child for why the US should allow "recall" elections.

At least for Congress-critters that are, for whatever reason, not the same person that was originally elected.

🤷‍♂️ 🤷‍♂️

[-] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago

See, I'd have said George Santos is the poster child for that.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

There should really be a way for a party or it's base to initiate a recall election. We've had some recent cases of Republicans trying to recall Democrats. It should be for "buyers remorse" and not "we want a do-over".

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Honestly there should be both. Just make the trigger for the general recall an exceptionally high bar.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

So long as it's a proper election, that same ballot bullshit here in California is braindead. Let alone the fact that it's a free for all vote, while good old Arnold was actually decent in a doing his best sorta way well we got lucky 20 years ago. Imagine if a Trumper was in charge of California? Mind you I'm pretty sure they'd be locked down by the state Congress and perhaps even impeached on the first fuck up but still.

[-] Fredthefishlord 3 points 2 days ago

If there was a recall mechanism, I think it would be unreasonable to restrict it to just the party of the candidate

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah it should be for Fetterman and the people who run as democrats and switch upon election.

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

There was one that was more egregious. I don't remember her name, but this one formally announced that she changed sides after winning. To my knowledge, Johnny boy still calls himself a Democrat.

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

She took decades to change though. This dude did it in one term.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 137 points 3 days ago

"Ladies and gentlemen, please note that the part of 'Joe Manchin' will now be played by John Fetterman."

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 78 points 3 days ago

Remember when Joe Lieberman basically mangled the ACA to ensure profitd for his insurance buddies?

Pepperidge Farm remembers.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 59 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yep. He is the sole reason we don't have Universal Healthcare. It was supposed to be one of the options we had to choose from, but he made sure to kill it.

His grave should have a public toilet on top of it.

[-] SatanClaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yup. Fucking psychopaths and society hasn't figured out we just need to cull them from power. Sad.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

wtf you talkin' about willis? Society hasn't figured out to delete fucking facebook and you want them to understand politics?

[-] SatanClaus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

I'd rather assume society had a chance then no chance. Too each their own lol

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago

His grave should have a public toilet on top of it.

I personally think its already just an open air urinal.

[-] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago

Almost like the democrats are a party designed to give working class voters something that feels like representation but is purposely sabotaged with malicious actors so that no meaningful progress can be made

Funny how the gop doesn’t have a fetterman, manchin, Lieberman, etc blocking project 2025, supreme court confirmations, post 9/11 bullshit, etc. and somehow manages to always get their agenda pushed through

Funny how the gop comes into office and smashes their agenda through where a single person will derail the democrats. “Oh this thing that will benefit all workers?? So sorry, Krysten sinema said no…” but then elon musk and trump dismantle the government in like 2 months and the democrats are like aw geez.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago

Murkowski? McCain (specifically thinking about ACA)?

The Republicans have been stopped by their own politicians playing 'maverick' before. You forget how little got done in the Senate during Trump's first turn.

[-] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

He got 3 Supreme Court justices and an insane amount of court stacking done. He didn’t get everything but he got enough to set the stage for today

Republican “mavericks” are because every once in a while one of them develops a conscience. They get a gay kid or something. Democrat “mavericks” are theater: sinema and fetterman were always class traitors. Anyone looking into their history for even 30 seconds will see that clearly. They are promoted by the party to ensure there will always be some dissent, to make sure there will always be someone that can act as a heel. That way if something like right now is happening they can take the fall. Or if democrats get a commanding lead, they can take the fall again like when sinema and manchin had the role. “Oh sorry, no healthcare, student loan reform, minimum wage increase, etc for you!”

ACA was a joke. Admittedly the pre existing conditions bit amongst a few other regulatory changes were long overdue and very helpful. But ultimately the individual mandate with no financial support was toxic. People who didn’t have insurance weren’t not buying it because they thought it was fun not to. They couldn’t afford it, they were struggling. By forcing them to with penalties for not you created a generation of angry people. Not only did you not fix healthcare; you were financially punishing them for being too poor to buy into the system that you failed to adequately reform. But the increased signups thanks to this penalty system were great for the private insurance industry lobbying buddies that helped influence this bullshit

50 years from now democrats will be remembered for being absolutely spineless at best and more likely for being power hungry and owned by corporate influence

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago

During Biden's term they got even more judges confirmed. He should have knocked off a few Supremes so he could match him there, but I'm just pointing out that it's not like Republican terms are particularly productive.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Theres a lot of things biden should have done. And a lot of things he did that he should not have done. He was always unworthy to be president, and the history books won't be kind.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago

Theres always someone to fill the role of DNC rotating villain

[-] ragingdachshund@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

Nah. This guy is going to get primaried by the people who elected him over Mr. Crudite and then immediately turned and voted against their interests. Unlike that fraud Manchin, hell just bitch up and switch the letter behind his name and run again

[-] gndagreborn@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

Goes to show you what stroke does to a MF

[-] civil_drive@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 days ago

Brain damage leads to conservatism. We have a shit ton of brain damaged idiots here in the US.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Lead, and microplastics will do that to a MF

[-] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemm.ee 52 points 3 days ago

Deal with it? You mean, like, primary you and the 9 other simps who voted for this bill? Okay. That's good advice, thanks Fetterman.

[-] derry@midwest.social 10 points 2 days ago

Don't forget he met a head of state while wearing a hoodie and no one batted an eye. And shorts! Proud to be an American! /s

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Get started primarying this asshole right now.

[-] GreyAlien@lemm.ee 44 points 3 days ago

And he just got gifted a silver-plated pager by netanyahu earlier this week.

This guy is a disgusting political waste.

[-] tburkhol@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Wait, really? You know what Israelis do with pagers, right?

[-] prole 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That was the entire point. They are celebrating and making light of literal genocide.

[-] GreyAlien@lemm.ee 17 points 3 days ago

The video truly display the humiliation and subtle threat.

The gift is akin to saying "we own you and we will do with you as we please or else.."

[-] Dultas@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Not that it matters now. But isn't taking gifts from foreign representatives illegal as an office holder.

[-] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Fetterman also wanted to defund United Nations Relief and Works Agency, defended a certain Brian Thompson, referred to the hush-money case against Trump as “bullshit“, said that Democrats need to stop 'freaking out' over everything Trump does, and said that he would ‘fully support’ U.S. troops in Gaza.

[-] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 7 points 3 days ago

Sounds like a mole

[-] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

Fuck that guy

[-] SnotFlickerman 13 points 3 days ago

Sounds exactly like what he said after he threatened a jogging black man with a shotgun.

[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago

Same advice to the victims in the most recent (as of this minute, anyway) mass shooting. 3 dead in NM.

Deal with it.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 11 points 3 days ago

Disappointment has a shape, and it's John Fetterman.

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Ahh, this coming from a guy with the spine of a jellyfish.

[-] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Couldn’t he be removed from his job due to clear and severe mental health issues and complications following his CVA?

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 3 days ago

Man, he really doesn't care if he's going to get reelected. Because he sure isn't, unless maybe if he runs as a Republican.

[-] TemplaerDude@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

I hope this piece of shit is happy knowing he'll be a single term scumbag.

[-] Maeve@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

https://youtu.be/9CnPv_1SVh0

Eta the flash on my device seemed activated when I clicked that link from search results. Pretty sure I didn't accidentally do it myself, and there's no photo I see on my device. But also I'm viewing this site in dark mode and search was b on w...

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
270 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22232 readers
3582 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS