1300
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Charlxmagne@lemm.ee 2 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

That's the issue with the FPTP voting system, it always eventually leads to a 2-party state like the US and the majority of the population votes for someone other than the winning party.

This happens in literally every country with the same voting system as the US.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

How many of those who didn't vote were from the states where Democrats won?

How many were from swing states?

How many were from Red states?

In an electoral college based election these nuances matter.

[-] DTguess@lemmy.ca 9 points 15 hours ago

Compulsory voting in Australia is looking good

[-] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago

Australia has a pretty good preferential voting system too.

The only major problem with elections in Australia that comes to my mind is the way political advertising works. Truth in advertising laws do not apply to political ads, for fuck-knows what reason. And there's a lot of money sloshing around for the purpose of supporting the politicians who support certain groups. The media landscape isn't exactly an even playing field.

But the voting part itself is genuinely quite well done.

[-] Numenor@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

We can't expect Americans to travel to Australia. Be realistic.

[-] AugustWest@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

We give a lot of chances to vote in the US. Mail in ballots, early voting, polling places open late. Discounting the tiny group of people who do not have and cannot get proper ID, and the tiny group of totally disabled people with no support system whatsoever, everyone should be able to figure out getting their vote in.

That leaves the people who don’t want to vote. But there is no way around the fact that being unforgivably stupid. Does your vote really matter in our crushingly ineffectual two-party system? Not as much as I would like. But there is an obvious choice between a party intent on dismantling the very foundation of the nation, and one simply content to let it fall apart. Voting for the former assures destruction, voting for the latter gives us time. Voting for neither, is moronic.

My point - Do we think that forcing this group of lazy and/or idiotic Americans to vote would add anything valuable to the political process?

Education is where positive political participation begins. Until we fix that and stop actively making it worse, there is no election reform solution to the festering rot of ignorance and apathy.

[-] Stomata@sh.itjust.works 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Why on earth these people didn't vote?

[-] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

When 43/50 states are already locked in and decided a lot of people don't bother. That's a huge reason for people not voting.

If elections were actually decided by popular vote you'd see more people voting. The electoral college is a voter suppression tool.

[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Misogyny is part of it.

[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

It's something to keep in mind.

Don't alienate those 36.32%. I'm sure some of us have strong feelings about their choices, but at the end of the day they outnumber Democrats and Republicans each by quite a bit. If you want to see change you are going to have to convince some of them to join you. This goes for elections and this goes for revolutions.

[-] palencharizard@lemm.ee 24 points 20 hours ago

This is misleading.

According to those stats, the majority of people voted for someone other than Harris as well.

The real takeaway here is large percentage of people that don't vote.

[-] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago

Harris isn't claiming a mandate.

[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Historically when people vote in higher numbers we end up with Democratic Presidents.

[-] caboose2006@lemm.ee 8 points 16 hours ago

I'll take whoever this "Did not vote" instead please

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

More people voted for no president, kick Trump out of the whitehouse

[-] Bristingr@lemm.ee 1 points 20 minutes ago

No, their lack of voting meant they were fine with either candidate. Only 1.06% said they weren't fine with either.

[-] scifun@lemmy.world 44 points 23 hours ago

Both times Trump won was when a woman was running against him. The only time he lost was to a white old man.

USA is just sexist and Americans better come to terms with it rather than making up random reasons.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

If only things were that simple. Humans love to focus on just one reason, but when dealing with a population of voters you have to use statistics to understand anything about whats going on. I'm sure sexism was a factor but theres so much more than that.

[-] Jyek@sh.itjust.works 15 points 22 hours ago

Correlation is not causation. We elected Obama who was one of the youngest presidents in US history first term. Also he was Black. I'm not saying the country is sexist, but I am saying both the female candidates that made it the general election, ran on dog shit platforms of "more of the same"

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 16 points 23 hours ago

Basically if Tim Walz was the presidential candidate he probably would have won.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hikuro93@lemmy.ca 9 points 21 hours ago

While your logic does have a point, and there's no shortage of sexists out there, I must also state that both Clinton and Harris were horrid candidates as well, and both followed a democrat president the people were starting to/were done with.

Not only that, but both times Trump preyed on what the people were desperate to hear: "Better living conditions, lower prices" and all that. This was mainly the illusion of choice between two evils, and they chose the one that seemed to be the lesser one. The one who appeared to be "more honest" and despite being a nepo-baby called out and criticized all other rich people.

The issue is the system itself, and the fact that voters choose their candidates like celebrities or their sports team. See Harris making her campaign way more about celebrity endorsement than commiting to actual societal issues. She was never gonna win like that, and even if she did, she would still be a bad president. Not worse for sure, now that we all are seeing current Trump starting all sorts of conflicts and trying to become a dictator, but still a bad president.

The US can elect a female president. But so far the options picked for that were absolutely horrid, and I know there's several good and competent female leaders who are both democrats and republicans. Sadly they have too much common sense or lean too much to the centre to be taken seriously by the ones who want to create a spectacle.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DelusionalCyberDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

Let's be honest here, both parties are full of shit. During Biden term 3500 students had their visa revoked due to anti Zionist protests, let alone canary mission bullshit.

And do not forget about insider trading and that both parties are funded by private companies

[-] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago

BoTh SiDeS!!

They are not the same. One is an open Nazi party

[-] Spectrism@feddit.org 1 points 7 hours ago

Being an open Nazi party vs. "only" openly supporting Nazis doesn't really make the choice much easier.

Obviously Dems would have been somewhat better, but I really can't blame anyone with a conscience for voting third-party or not at all when both main parties are fucking horrible.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 15 points 21 hours ago

In conclusion 68% let Trump win or directly voted for him.

[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 4 points 16 hours ago

Turnout is low when votes don't matter and voters get suppressed when their vote does matter. This is working as designed.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 1 points 10 hours ago

Many of us got voter roll purged. If you get purged you don't technically get a vote because provisional ballots are only counted if the race is close ... and the race wasn't close because of the provisional ballots.

[-] splonglo@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

American democracy and freedom are fucked. But I don't blame those 36% of non-voters. These people were INSPIRED to give up on politics.

It's the media environment. Political coverage fucking sucks by design. Left populism is too interesting to be given air time, too much of a threat to the people who fund the parties and own the media. Politics used to be interesting. Politicians used to say things, now they just run out the clock with white noise.

[-] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

I mean no

In an election between Bush and Kerry (the guy who lost 2004 election) or something like that then yes. People can be annoyed or just too busy to vote.

This election was perfectly clear that the future of US democracy was at stake and more than 1/3 of the voters decided to not show up. They decided that they were fine not choosing and as such fine with either option. I mean even if the choice was between Trump and a dog, the dog should have won by a landslide. 4 years of nothing would have been miles better than the decades that US is going back.

This presidency is already catastrophic and it barely even started.

I don’t even know how the US and the world can handle 4 years of this shit at this pace.

[-] splonglo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

PERFECTLY CLEAR? They walked back calling them WEIRD, let alone FASCISTS! And the moment they win Biden is shaking hands and saying lets all get along! Where's the panic? Where's the urgency?

People do not know what's going on. They still don't. You have no appreciation for how much noise is drowning out the signal. If the Dems gave a shit about democracy they should have called Don a pedophile 1000 times every day of the campaign.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 13 points 21 hours ago

68.1% of US citizens are bloody idiots.

[-] mr2meows@pawb.social 5 points 17 hours ago

trump talked about how elon knows those voting computers so well

[-] Lumbardo@reddthat.com 2 points 14 hours ago

I would say that the Republicans winning the popular vote made it a pretty decisive victory.

[-] Ferus42@lemm.ee 3 points 13 hours ago

Winning by less than 1% is not decisive.

Did you somehow miss that the meme is about the people who chose to vote for a third party, or not at all?

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago

I need to mention that the reason why 20 million fewer voters voted is. Because of the massive voter suppression that was done prior to the 2024 election. So many people were purged from voters rolls and many polling places were closed it wasn't funny.

[-] Zetta@mander.xyz 15 points 1 day ago

While I'm sure that was part of it, a lot of people didn't vote for other reasons as well. Someone I know who you would probably consider "left" didn't vote at all because of Harris supporting Israel (I'm aware trump is worse for Palestinians), and I know a bunch of other people I've spoken to online also didn't vote at all for the same reason.

Plus I suspect a lot of other previous Biden voters didn't vote at all for similar reasons, like possibly all party's are owned by the rich.

Bottom line, a class war is needed to get the rich in check.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] sinnsykfinbart@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago

Those who didn't vote, who thought their vote didn't matter, that no matter which politician gets elected to whatever office.... they're complicit.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

You lot never blame the dem leadership for making their biggest funder AIPAC/Israel, and allowing AIPAC funding to completely steer the party platform, the candidate choice, and the course of the race. Somehow Dem leaders are simply immune from blame in your eyes, even when AIPAC steers this outcome straight to a loss and Israelis said they never wanted the dems to win anyway.
The dems losing was much more desirable to AIPAC than a non genocide dem entering the race. The polls told dem leadership they were going to lose for the entire race and they decided to take the loss rather than give in to the no-to-genocide voters. AIPAC/Israel was more important to dem leadership than winning the race. Why do you still imagine that AIPAC supports dem voters or cares about America? You've learned nothing and you're on the way to lose some more. Did you hear Dem leaders talk about the needs of the voters very much? No. You didnt-- but you sure saw them get animated and passionate about supporting zionist war crimes.

For my vote, I wasnt going to lift a finger for any war criminal of any party, even if it meant this country burned itself to the ground. If the choice is murder lots of innocents or burn this place to the ground, I chose not to participate and let this place burn itself to the ground, and I'll do it again if needed-- so will lots of other people -- and theres nothing you can do about it. Dems cant win an election without them either.

So "blame" me on the internet all day, your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer. I hope every dem leader gets to experience unemployment, and if it leads to revolution or "regime change" as we like to casually say it when its other countries suffering, then so be it. Its past time for this farce to "fundamentally change".

[-] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The only significantly statically impactful group of "non voters" is the population that was unable to or inconvenienced heavily by voting.

Meaning the major majority of voters that didn't vote were either unable to because of other obligations (work, childcare, etc) with a small subset of that being people that were no motivated enough to deal with the inconvenience of visiting a poll line (4hours in line) after a 10 hour shift.

These are the vast vast majority of people that did not show up. Beyond that an even smaller percentage was the "protest voters' that even if 100% of which went to Harris she still would have lost.

I guess I just want to say "in conclusion" that the vast majority of voters that didn't vote were giving you your Starbucks or your Taco Bell.

I think we should spend less time blaming voters and more time being critical of the politicians and party that gives zero reason for the working class to "risk" their shift for.

No one's gonna "risk a shift" for the policies and messaging that Harris communicated. You don't get people to "risk their shift" for voting for a lesser evil.

[-] ceiphas@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Sometimes i get the feeling that voting on a tuesday is working as expected: to keep working an poor people from voting...

Germany has voting per defintion only on sundays, and (at least where i live) the voting booths are everywhere. You can vote either per mail, or from 8:00 to 18:00 at a booth, and i never had to wait in a line to vote, and i'm in my 40s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] yoriaiko 12 points 23 hours ago

"my vote won't change anything", "i don't like any of them", "that won't affect me", call leopards for those 36%

[-] yournamehere@lemm.ee 23 points 1 day ago

pfff... he won twice. if americans would want a real democracy that wouldnt have happened.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Silar@infosec.pub 26 points 1 day ago

How gross it is, considering what was in the line that so many didn’t vote. Also I bet the duck he cheated.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TranslateErr0r@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

Stop this bs. Rules are set before the game begins.

[-] Foni@lemm.ee 7 points 21 hours ago

Well, in 1933 when the NSPD came to power they had 43% of the seats in parliament (I haven't found the percentage of the total votes but I imagine it was much less). That did not prevent them from repeating the elections at the end of that year and getting more than 90%, you can imagine how.

Even a part of popular culture accepts that they came to power by winning elections and the German people feel and felt the shame that they came to power by democratic means, which is only half true.

I feel sorry for the American people, but they elected this team under the same rules of democracy as their previous presidents. To claim now that his election was not democratic is to distort the facts.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
1300 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7082 readers
4344 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS