1315
Missed it by that much
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
1315 points (100.0% liked)
Political Memes
7105 readers
2244 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Fucking wrong. Every asshole who abstained from voting, voted for Trump. He received 60%. At the very least, that 30% didnt vote for someone else.
If you people want me to vote for your candidate, make sure they aren't just the "lesser evil."
Try doing something different next time if you want different results. Don't repeat the same mistakes.
Blame everyone who voted for hillary clinton in the 2016 primary for why we now have 2 trump presidencies. They're out of touch.
I get the frustration but this is a bad take.
In a two-party, first-past-the-post system you kinda have an ethical obligation to vote for the lesser evil. It's just a statistical fact you can't ignore.
It fucking blows, but if your choices are the shitty status quo or full blown fascism, you really should pick the status quo.
Obviously doesn't fix the problem with the Democrat party sliding further and further right since they can continue to claim "lesser evil"... and it also doesn't fix the DNC superdelegate shenanigans that got us Hillary instead of Bernie... but I'd rather the country be able to still exist to fight another day.
Not really, but you're free to believe that.
The ethical stance to take against 2 evil candidates is to support neither. Supporting the lesser evil makes useful idiots think that they're winning and therefore stop fighting back.
Any ire you direct towards the people who don't support evil candidates would be better spent directed towards those who do support evil candidates. i.e. don't waste your breath arguing with non-voters, dedicate that energy towards the people who keep supporting candidates that don't represent their interests.
Actually, the people who refuse to support evil candidates are a statistical fact you can't ignore.
Since we're talking facts, let me lay another one on you. All you people do when you get mad at me for not voting is reinforce my decision to keep doing it. I'm not going to cave to look good in front of ya'll, I genuinely don't care what most of you think.
Either run a candidate that supports the working class, or I'm not voting for them.
This may be the ethical thing to do. However, ethical is not always the best.
By not voting the lesser evil, you allowed the more evil to win the elections.
The percentage of non-voting people has no direct impact to the end result. In a perfect democratic world, that non-voting majority would sign the elected government to be more careful with their decisions, as people are loosing trust. In the current state of "democracy", a fascist just took over and started dismantling the country.
I've mentioned before how the problem with the lesser evil is that useful idiots stop fighting.
Since neither side really cares about solving the problems that face us as a species, it's a loss no matter what.
Yes, it's a loss no matter what. But when you get to decide whether to eat a shit sandwich or a paper sandwich, you either choose to eat the paper sandwich or you're forced to eat the shit sandwich. Guess you opted for the shit sandwich.. enjoy!
I know, it''s called an analogy. :) Might be a bad one, sure, but I wasn't talking literally. Didn't think I'd have to explain that. But then again, 77 million people voted for trump, so.. not completely surprised either.
Not a mod. Also not hiding. No idea wtf you're on about. You probably had whatever musk had.
Yeah, because Harris wouldn't have caused the shit fest that's intensifying right about now. Probably wouldn't have been a great president either, but a meh president is better than whatever the trump+musk combo is. Two months in and it's already affecting people halfway around the world and somehow you're glad. That doesn't say anything good about you, not sure why you're advertising it.
Why does it have to be one or the other? People can multi task, you know. Also, I'm not American, democrat, politician, or anything related to running better candidates for you. And something tells me you could have the best candidate the world had ever seen and they'd still not win, so keep telling yourself that it's not up to you, that'll surely help.
You're conflating voting for someone with supporting them. I didn't support Hillary or Kamala but I still voted for them because the alternative was so much worse. That's just the shitty reality of our two-party, fptp voting system.
In this system, one of those two parties will win regardless of how you specifically cast or don't cast your vote. The time to fight for the ideal candidate is the four years leading up to the election. When you get to the ballot box, you really just have to swallow what's perfect and pick what's not terrible (at least in that moment).
But the alternative is effectively accelerationism, throwing millions of people under the bus, and hoping that things shake out in your favor after a violent revolution. Which... I don't agree with as a plan, but we're kind of already on this path so 🤷♂️.
Also, I'm not mad at you. And I think I largely agree with you, with anger at the system and candidate selection. I just don't agree with you about casting your vote being the time and place to stage a protest (in a system like ours at least).
No, I'm not conflating anything. I'm referring directly to the people that supported hillary clinton over Bernie Sanders in the 2016 primary.
It's fine for us to disagree on this. Perhaps more fascism will eventually cause you to advocate for doing something different.
I can say with certainty that trying to argue with me about why I should support the lesser evil is a complete waste of your time and energy.
Well, I guess we'll just have to agree on that then.
You have to vote according to how the electoral system actually works, not how you wish it worked. Unless you - yes, you - are personally prepared to fund and organise a revolution to change that system then you vote against the actual fascist.
I can tell you're going to go through whatever mental gymnastics are necessary to convince yourself that voting for the lesser evil is somehow a win.
Sorry you've been conditioned to dedicate so much energy working against your own interests. If more of you diverted that energy to the people supporting our oppressors, we wouldn't need to be having this discussion.
My friend, the only one performing mental gymnastics right now is you trying to convince yourself that what you have achieved by refusing to vote against a fascist is a win.
Assuming you're an American, by refusing to vote against fascism I'm pretty sure you won't be having any free discussions in a year or so lest you be carted off by the local stasi.
How? Either way I lose.
If I voted for harris and harris won, I still lost. If I voted for harris and trump won, I still lost. if I voted for trump and trump won, I still lost.
You're naive enough to believe that harris winning is the same as you winning, and that's just proving my point. You've been conditioned to think that a slow loss is the same as a win.
Yeah, you're too far gone to be taken seriously. Your reply is just an automated response you feel compelled to make to fit in with other people who are also too far gone.
Gonna block you now. Good luck in life.
Because when you vote against a fascist you're considering wider society, not just your self.
The correct statement is 'if Harris gets in, I lost. If Trump gets in everyone loses. Its about more than just you.
I'm not American. What I am though is able to see that fascism is worse than conservatism. The fact that conservatism is still bad is irrelevant when the only other choice is an actual fascist because the fascist will probably remove your power to vote in the future.
Yeah, some truths are too uncomfortable to be lived with aren't they?
I find it very interesting how conceptualizing binary states vs continuous ranges play into justifying not voting for the lesser evil.
By definition, a request to acknowledge the lesser evil means that the audience is able to understand "evil" on a continuous range.
Yet all of the justifications I see against voting for the lesser evil center on viewing the world through an absolute, binary lens. "I lose either way." "Genocide is genocide, nevermind that there's more of it, protestors are being silenced, the ones doing the genocide call Trump's administration a 'dream team', we now have a genocide against trans citizens as well", etc.
Do you think you'd lose less had Kamala won? Why or why not?
My life is going to go on much the same no matter who is in office.
The rest of you, though, should be asking yourselves why the greater evil won and consider running a good candidate in the future.
The fact you're trying to justify "losing less" proves my point further about your conditioning. Try to direct some of that energy towards the people who have conditioned you. Maybe then the greater evil won't win next time because you people did something different.
Ah, now you're saying the quiet part out loud - you cast your vote from an ivory tower, and that privilege allows you to justify not voting by chasing an esoteric ideal while facing no real consequences.
Must be nice! If you have nothing at stake, there's very little reason to listen to your suggestions about voting. You have no skin in the game - you're the entitled rich kid protestor who, at the end of the day, goes back to a life they don't have to worry about.
That person is simultaneously saying that if Harris won, they would have lost while also saying that whoever is in office wouldn't affect them.
What quiet part out loud? I'm being realistic. Funny how you tried to get me to say "harris would've been better," and when I didn't you decided to take the "oh you're so privileged!" route instead. You've been conditioned to blame non-voters over the people who vote for establishment candidates that lose to fascists no matter what.
If you want to get mad at someone, get mad at the people who vote for nominees that will lose to trump. They expect people like me to "fall in line" instead of themselves. They'd rather have trump than a candidate who actually fights for the working class, so that's what we get.
I've said this before and I guess I'll keep saying it again: All of the anger you people are directing towards non-voters would be better spent directed towards the people supporting candidates that nobody wants to vote for.
In other words, get mad at the people who voted against Bernie in the primaries. They're the reason why I didn't go out and vote. They're the reason why we have 2 trump presidencies.
It's your turn to "fall in line," otherwise you're cool with a fascist in office.
I don't expect you to "fall in line" though. You're just going to keep getting mad at people like me and expecting different results. You're a bigger ally of fascism than any non-voter ever could be.
I like how none of this giant wall of text contests that you're talking about votes from an insulated place of privilege. You'll also notice that I never tried to influence who you vote for, I simply asked about why you voted that way. I let you explain why you would or would not be losing less if Kamala had won. (I will say thought, If you feel penned in when asked to explain your thoughts, it might be a sign they require more consideration.)
I don't give a shit how you vote, I just wanted to see the thought process behind folks who obstinately refuse to acknowledge that things are on a continuum, instead viewing things on a binary level. I want to talk to someone that believes so hard they they were willing to sacrifice, not someone to whom a vote is inconsequential no matter what.
You know how in flatland, the 1d dot cannot be blamed for not knowing there exists higher dimensions?
To your life experience, the candidates were genuinely are the same. That is both enviable and pitiful.
Cheers, have a good day.
You've literally recycled bullet points from multiple posts while not acknowledging a single thing I've said, lol.
Your life experience dictates that both candidates were the same. I've understood that about you, and I know that that's why you don't believe in a "lesser evil", because to you they're genuinely the same evil. Your life doesn't change much no matter which was elected, so you feel free to vote your conscience. Does that sound about right?
Are you talking to me, trying to understand me, or are you talking to a caricature you've put up in your head? What makes you think I'm mad?
Vote against genocide. It's that simple. There are no excuses, when genocide is on the table, you do something.
Yeah... now people have to argue if whoever you're talking about really supports genocide, and to what extent.
Yeah fuck off. At least Kamala wouldn’t have been trying to cripple and invade my country
Like I said, I don't expect you people to do anything different.
This song and dance is going to go on until the day I die and likely long after.
Who is “you people”. I’m not American.
I also wasn’t a huge fan of Kamala but at least she wasn’t threatening the sovereignty of numerous nations. She had terrible views on Gaza but she also wasn’t talking about bulldozing Gaza to set up her own luxury resort on top of the corpses.
But no thank you for being so moral as to not vote for her. I’ll think of you when Trump sends his military into Canada and my city
You people are the ones fighting the non-voters instead of those nominating candidates the people don't want to vote for.
Instead of getting mad at me, you people should be getting mad at those who keep nominating candidates I refuse to vote for.
You're wasting your breath trying to convince me to change. I've said before all you guys do when you get angry at me for non-voting is reinforce my decision to do so. This means that all of you arguing against me are actually arguing in favor of more fascism, because that's what we keep getting.
A protest (non) vote is useless if you’re not going to get to vote again. If you want to fight for something, maybe fight to get rid of FPTP and your two party system that has lead to this scenario.
I am mad at them. I don’t even like the Democratic Party, they’re barely any better than the Canadian Conservative Party (at least before PP who has pushed the party much further in Trump’s direction).
But again, at least they weren’t planning an invasion of my country, or Panama, or Greenland/Denmark. Or putting people (including Canadians!) in camps. Or selling out Ukraine to buddy up with Russia. Or tearing down any “check and balance” your government had, in record time
I may not be able to convince you but you’re definitely affirming my view
If it's this easy to "invade" canada, then why would you have faith in the state at all?
average american
Oh man this imperial crybaby is canadian? lol.
You would be happy with her continuing to invade and cripple other countries tho?
When the hell did I say that? Don’t put words in my mouth you stupid fucking American
If you abstained from voting in a blue state you voted for trump? Logic does not compute.