503
submitted 22 hours ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 4 points 45 minutes ago

It's odd how some people get wealthy and then want to start their own utopian fifedom. Rich guys were attempting this throughout the 19th century too.

[-] febra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Soon they'll start building freedom camps around these cities and will fill them up with the millions of incarcerated Americans so they can work towards freedom. As Germans have put it before, work makes you free.

[-] missandry351@lemmings.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

Why are billionaires such free loaders? Build your own shit with your own money!

[-] Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 minutes ago

They tried a couple times but people just don't really want to move to the middle of the ocean of a jungle compound in South America

[-] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 9 points 2 hours ago

Slave Plantations?

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Are they anything like red states? If so, they are here to suck at the teet of bigger, better states like California that provide for them.

Fuck these welfare queens.

[-] Billybob22@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago

Freedom Cities, even the name is a lie.

[-] AynRandLibertarian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

It's been opposite day for a while now....

[-] taanegl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Hey guys, have you heard this new punk band? They got this weird lead singer called Johnny Silverhand...

[-] Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world 22 points 4 hours ago

I just wish they would be honest with their naming schemes. Stop with the "freedom this" and "freedom that" nonsense. They don't give a good goddam about freedom and we all know it. They are just trying to build "company towns" with touchscreens. We've already been down this road. You can slap all the lipstick you want on it, but it's still a fucking pig.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Its spelled Freedumb now.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago

government officials ending every phrase with, "brought to you by carls jr" is getting more real of a likelihood all the time.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

elon's already wanting to build musklandia in texas.

[-] GenXLiberal@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

I guarantee those execs think they will be building Star Trek / Federation level society. But the comment above is right, it will be Cyberpunk just with shittier technologies driven by “the invisible hand of the market” or some other drivel.

[-] Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 minutes ago

Literally Snow Crash, each burb is a independent corpocity state

[-] Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago

Oh they know exactly what kind of cities they want to build. The wealthy have been wanting their slaves back since 1865.

[-] affenlehrer@feddit.org 4 points 4 hours ago

I believe the federation in Star Trek doesn't even use money

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

They do, they don't inside the federation because it's in practice largely post scarcity. Outside of federation space they use federation credits (likely based on stores of rare hard/impossible to replicate materials) and specifically around ds9 the currency was gold pressed latinum.

Also voyager with replicator rations and Holodeck time.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

they only allowed it on ds9 space station , when dealing with other races. in the form of latinum. also barring the marque colonies.

[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

DS9 just threw the whole concept of a utopia out all together. With some pretty great results, so I'm OK with it.

[-] RaptorBenn@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

Cyberpunk 2025

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago
[-] Azal@pawb.social 43 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You load sixteen tons, what do you get?

Another day older and deeper in debt

Saint Peter, don't you call me 'cause I can't go

I owe my soul to the company store

[-] imvii@lemmy.ca 42 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

These zones would allow wealthy investors to write their own laws and set up their own governance structures which would be corporately controlled and wouldn’t involve a traditional bureaucracy.

Why do I read this as incel rape cities?

[-] jameslkent@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 9 hours ago

They should absolutely do this because tech bros cannot do municipal government and they will spend years throwing all of their money into a nuclear powered bitcoin mining boondoggle with open sewage that produces nothing.

[-] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Fordlandia, multiplied by the 1%. If that removes billionaires from our society for good, I approve.

[-] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 14 points 11 hours ago

Ironically, “Freedom Cities” not free.

Every time an oppressor wants to enslave people, they use "freedom" as an excuse.

Exhibit A: People's Liberation Army. Its not a conquering, its liberating 🤣

Or Exhibit B: Maga

How do people ever get fooled by this? Its so dumb

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

Holy shit, it's the Burbclaves from Snow Crash.

[-] Cgers@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 minutes ago

I just started that book like a week ago, Even just the first couple pages and it was like "oh... oh no", even got the meta verse in there

[-] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Or the corporate entities from Jennifer Government.

[-] spacequetzal@lemm.ee 18 points 13 hours ago

More people need to play BioShock to understand why this is a bad idea.

[-] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 4 points 5 hours ago

No, no, Rapture was an EXCELLENT idea. Let's send Trump, Musk, and all the rest down there, and watch the results on television. It would be cathartic.

[-] Srh@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago

Or look at the history of company towns

[-] NotLemming@lemm.ee 6 points 10 hours ago
[-] gabbath@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Yep. It's my go-to video explainer for "freedom cities" aka network states.

[-] Zzyzx 19 points 14 hours ago

They keep trying this shit even though it never works. (Like there's literally no pictures of this actually, totally existent place. But it's a paradise. Trust me.)

[-] gabbath@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

First off, this video is obligatory watching on the topic. Go watch it now if you haven't.

Ok, back to Próspera. From the Wikipedia article:

The company is financed by several investors and venture capital firms, including Balaji Srinivasan, Peter Thiel, and Marc Andreessen, through the venture capital company Pronomos Capital.

It's literally the same guys, and they're trying it in the US too btw.

That Balaji guy in particular is the one who came up with the idea of "freedom cities", which he calls network states. He's also a follower of Curtis Yarvin, obviously, and just like him he's a two bit fascist crank who thinks he's of superior IQ.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] civil_drive@sh.itjust.works 22 points 14 hours ago

Libertarians do not understand how society works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KingCake_Baby@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

"techno-feudalism"

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago

Christ, why did we have to get the Shitty Dystopia versions from Snow Crash, Jennifer Government, and every Gibson novel, but none of the cool and fun shit like flying cars, off-planet living, and advanced medical/cybernetic tech.

Gonna have the corpo company town again. Instead of an online walled garden it’ll be a walled city with it’s own currency that gets traded at a steep loss if you try to go anyplace nicer. Keep you in your place.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 14 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
503 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21654 readers
4283 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS