138

Several countries have taken significant measures to try to encourage people to have more children and combat falling birth rates, but the U.S. is not one of them. Although the Department of Transportation was recently directed to give precedence to "communities with marriage and birth rates higher than the national average," earlier this month.

Now Musk, who President Donald Trump tapped to head the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has vocalized support for tax incentives for mothers.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

Turns out making the planet unlivable makes people not want to make more people.

[-] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 3 points 51 minutes ago

Not that I actually give a shit what JD Vance thinks. But I do kind of wonder what JD Vance thinks waking up every morning knowing that he's literally the vice president in name only and has no other function that hasn't been completely taken over by Musk.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 46 minutes ago

Vance was the arranged marriage. Musk is the trophy wife.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 52 minutes ago

This is backwards

[-] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 1 hour ago

How about UBI for all children? Or, if they really want to produce a baby boom, all children born on or after 2026-01-01?

But then the very next thought in my head is:

Republicans: do black and Mexican kids get it too, just for being citizens?

Society: …yes?

Republicans: and even if their mom is single and sometimes smokes weed and is also black?

Society: yes, they are still Americans under 18.

Republicans: nope, burn it down. Take back everybody’s money. I already spent mine though and it is not fair to put undue hardship on me by demanding it back just because of some lazy black toddlers who ignore the call of the mines!

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 28 points 11 hours ago

Good fucking Criminey I hate this bastard. Bro just wants generations of cheap wage slaves for him and his buddies to harass. The world will become a much nicer place once he dies on a Ketamine binge or something.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 52 minutes ago

Ketamine is a very safe drug

[-] prole 2 points 3 hours ago

Whoever supplies him could do us all a massive favor... Just a tiny bit of fentanyl is all it would take.

[-] __nobodynowhere@sh.itjust.works 27 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

What happened to "Can't feed them, don't breed them"? Why do I feel this tax break would only apply to a subsection of the US population?

[-] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

Even better...enforce laws against unlawful termination of pregnant employees:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/09/tesla-workers-terminated-claim-maternity-sick-leave

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

Reminder that Harris suggested a 6k tax rebate for parents of newborns, and even that isn't really ideal but it's the same idea as it helps offset lost wages and subsidizes childcare which is desperately needed.

And before you say "but why have kids if you can't support them"--- that's irrelevant as far as society is concerned. Shit gets dystopian really fast when there's no new people. We are supposed to finance education for similar reasons, too, as a functioning adult generation prevents .... Well, all this crap we're dealing with now.

[-] adarza@lemmy.ca 75 points 17 hours ago

lemme guess. the law will be written in such a way that it very narrowly defines a situation where a father with multiple children with multiple mothers, and billions in unrealized 'earnings' each year, could split their own income between them, file jointly several times over, and end up getting back billions in earned income credit instead of paying in anything?

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 27 points 15 hours ago

Cool. SO those of us who can't or won't breed have to subsidize the ones who do. Fuck that shit.

[-] Fredthefishlord 18 points 13 hours ago

Children are the future generation. As much as musk is a shit hole, you're also a selfish bastard for not wanting to allow children to grow up secure. Do you hate paying for school?

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 10 points 12 hours ago

Fast forward. Retirement homes, health care workers, etc. Definitely will be the kids of now taking care of all of us as we get older.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

We already do with a welfare system that incentivises un(der)employed single mothers with multiple children.

Even a married couple with multiple kids and minimum wage jobs can achieve a higher standard of living with entitlements than a single person with no kids, college education, and a job making above minimum wage.

[-] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 73 points 17 hours ago

This is who is running your country

[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 65 points 17 hours ago

Dude looks like baron Harkonnen.

[-] aviationeast@lemmy.world 34 points 17 hours ago
[-] Placebonickname@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

Baron H. Was the bad buy in the first book, but if you keep reading that series you learn that having 1 all powerful leader is never really a good idea.

Just food for thought.

[-] SnotFlickerman 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Lookin more like a Stimpy gross-up close-up every minute.

[-] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 16 hours ago

No sir, i don't like it.

[-] tiefling 11 points 16 hours ago

He looks like a giant roach in a rotting flesh suit

[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 54 points 18 hours ago

Sounds like they need children for the war machine.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 21 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Or general labor, for some reason Republicans keep talking about how they happily worked the fields when they were 10 or whatever. They just want to ensure child labor is available for all.

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 16 hours ago

Shit, i should type this into a pretty infographic somewhere, the number of times that i repeat it:

The labor market is a market, it is regulated by Supply and Demand. Less supply (fewer workers) ==> higher prices (higher wages).

That is good for the workers, and it increases the quality-of-life. That is a true socioeconomic strategy.

Musk is a grifter who wants to breed cheap wage-slaves who would earn almost nothing and who would spend their lives in poverty. Expendable slaves. If the people have fewer children, that becomes less doable.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 14 hours ago

It's exactly why Republicans are so against abortion as well. Have as many babies as possible and dilute the labor market so wages go as low as possible.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

As I mentioned elsewhere: Grist for the mill.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 26 points 18 hours ago

Grist for the mill.

[-] belastend@slrpnk.net 5 points 15 hours ago

Hey, maybe you could also introduce like an award for mothers with lots of children! Like a mother's cross. It could come in like 3 different tier and if you reach the highest, the Führer himself will visit you :)

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
138 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20416 readers
2861 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS