What are passengers expected to do with this info?
they solve far more problems than they introduce.
It is worse for pedestrians, who now have twice as many traffic signals to wait for. It is worse for cyclists, with "gauntlet" bike lanes running between through- and right-turning lane. It is only better for cars...so hardly the "best" interchange in existence.
I think he means take a right onto the freeway on-ramp, just before the diverging part.
Some cities will install bike racks for merchants if requested. In fact, some cities require bike racks as part of any planning permit.
It is "fuck cars" content because 1. the lack of proper bike infrastructure is what led to the crash, and 2. making road victims have to hire lawyers just to get their medical bills paid.
California: "First time?"
https://theintercept.com/2021/05/07/california-fires-chico-housing-real-estate/
Actually, the law does just say "above 85db" is not allowed. Doesn't matter if the car is stock or not.
For those interested in this topic, there are better sources of info than a NJB youtube video. In my experience, NJB is more interested in clicks than accuracy, and this video is no exception.
In particular, the complaints about oversized firetrucks is a bit overblown because any halfway competent bike planner can work around that when designing bike facilities. When cities say they can't do a bike project because of FD concerns, it usually means they just don't want to do an otherwise popular project, and are using flimsy FD excuses as a convenient way to kill a project.
No, it's gotten worse over the past 30 years.
Not mentioned in the article is that these systems are still illegal in the US.
Regardless of who got elected, NHTSA was never going to do anything about this. Biden had 4 years to do something about Tesla FSD, and just "investigated" endlessly.