385

Summary

JD Vance called for the rehiring of Marko Elez, a 25-year-old DOGE staffer who resigned after The Wall Street Journal exposed his racist and eugenicist tweets.

Elon Musk polled users on X about reinstating Elez, with 78% supporting his return.

Vance, while disagreeing with Elez’s posts, opposed “rewarding journalists who try to destroy people.”

Elez had access to the U.S. Treasury’s payment system before resigning.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 136 points 2 weeks ago

The guy said normalize Indian hate (among other terrible things) and Vance’s wife is Indian. His soul is long sold

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 72 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Vance would kill his entire family for power.

^^^and ^^^mascara

He'd kill for a nice Loveseat.

[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

[Joke about Vance sleeping on the couch.]

[-] Terminal_ERROR@lemm.ee 9 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago

Also never marry outside your race!

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

Wtf I thought this was something years ago that they're saying "don't let an old post ruin your life now". He posted this shit in September

The account linked to Elez tweeted in September, “You could not pay me to marry outside of my ethnicity.”

The same month, the account tweeted ″‘Normalize Indian hate,’ referring to a post noting the prevalence of people from India in Silicon Valley,” the Journal reported.

[-] CMLVI@lemmy.world 74 points 2 weeks ago

In the same breath, they refer to him as a kid making a mistake, to appeal to us. We've all been in somewhat similar situations, making mistakes as kids. And then seconds later, he's a highly trained professional who is well-equipped to manage poring through Treasury docs and deciding where funding is sent or ceased.

What is he? Is he a kid or is he an adult? Be consistent. Fuck everything about this.

[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago

"We shouldn't reward journalists who try to destroy people. Ever," said Vance, referring to the fact that The Wall Street Journal on Thursday exposed Elez's connection to an X account that made the inflammatory tweets.

Destroy people by simply pointing out what those people said lol.

[-] Dashi@lemmy.world 43 points 2 weeks ago

And what they said RECENTLY too. They were not dredging up tweets from 40 years ago. If memory serves these tweets were within the year.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 weeks ago

In September!!!

The account linked to Elez tweeted in September, “You could not pay me to marry outside of my ethnicity.”

The same month, the account tweeted ″‘Normalize Indian hate,’ referring to a post noting the prevalence of people from India in Silicon Valley,” the Journal reported.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair it's hard to have old social media posts when you're still drinking milk.

[-] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago

78% of bots approve his return.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Seems legit

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, Assistant to the vice president Vance, you shouldn't be giving advice.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

"Journalists shouldn't destroy people, that's our job. We make sure only the right people get destroyed, though, so it's all good"

[-] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 26 points 2 weeks ago

So government decisions are now being made on polls on X? WTAF??

[-] LadyMeow 13 points 2 weeks ago

Lmao, yes. Haven’t you been paying attention? Elmo is president. The naz…. I mean Roman saluters are running the show

[-] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Interesting way to force people to keep using it. If you want to vote on these things you need an X account, but no sane, decent person is on X anymore so can't influence the vote

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 weeks ago

The United States vice president had sex with couches. What a time to be alive.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago

Vance is a total cuck. Imagine having to tell your wife and your kids that you called for someone to be rehired after he resigned because it was discovered he was saying to hate on Indians....

[-] Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Do you think his wife and kids are any different? They probably talk about how the "kid was just being stupid" and "everyone makes racist comments at one time or another" around the dinner table while listening to John Denver

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 6 points 2 weeks ago

I doubt this is even true. They probably just hate themselves or see themselves as white.

[-] themaninblack@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Actually this might be true. There are many ultra conservative Indians

[-] Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Surprised his wife is Indian. What a strange fucking world we live in.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 23 points 2 weeks ago

Can I buy some kind of financial instrument that invests in precisely the opposite shit JD Vance does because the opposite of JD Vance is smart as fuck.

[-] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

I'm thinking of investing in "JD Vance killed Donald Trump" merch, not because he did, but considering Donald's age and arteries, if Trump dies of natural causes in office, I'll be able to ride that conspiracy into my own retirement.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

it is 2026, much of North America is desert. Machines mine what little is left unspent and undefiled. Upon this horizon we can be seen riding giant sandworms of conservative bullshit nonsense, our hooks of satire set sure on yet another raid on Bigot Town.

In this future winning is a state of mind, something beyond a matter of deducing likelihoods of success in particular acts of resistance, it is rather more like getting a high score in tony hawk pro skater.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lol a while back I heard of an anti Kramer index, so anti jdv might be a thing

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

prays to flying spaghetti monster oh please my noodly lord make this dream come true

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck the racist posts this was the guy mucking about in the treasury systems financial computer code without any safeties. All changes directly to live. He should be black listed for that idiocy alone.

[-] Xanza@lemm.ee 21 points 2 weeks ago

Jesus Christ, I forgot Vance was even there....

[-] rarbg@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago

I hope im alive when the next Wolfenstein comes out! Kill american nazis!

America died with a whimper! Definitely not as strong as the Ukraine!

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 weeks ago

FYI, "the Ukraine" was the label Russians (and Risk) used for the region. It's just Ukraine now.

[-] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] DABDA@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

America died with a whimper!

Do you get royalties every time you say this or something? You've had an account for ~3 days and you've already used variations of that phrase at least 8 times. I'm not attacking the sentiment, it just feels forced and isn't a particularly witty comment worthy of that much repetition.

[-] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Definitely no royalties! Just stating the obvious. I thought there would be more of a bang, but nope. You dont have to like it. I dont agree with everything I read online, but that is the great thing about our current lives is that we have the ability to disagree. I just hope it stays that way

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

I guess he got done fucking every couch in the Naval Observatory and finally had time to make a statement to the press

[-] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Don't make Vance cry, his mascara will run

[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

cannon fodder is useful.

this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
385 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20394 readers
2768 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS