245
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by FundMECFSResearch to c/dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kernal64@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 days ago

I don't think I've ever seen what appears to be a line graph loop back on itself.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 days ago

Visualise it as a 3d graph seen from the top.

[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 6 points 2 days ago
[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But in this graph it's correct, isn't it?

A bit of a strange choice of axis, but technically it's correct, I think.
We see how during COVID people died earlier although expenses went up (didn't check the dates, but I guess that's the thing?), and afterwards expenses went down, but people grow older again
Or do I completely misunderstand this?

[-] abfarid@startrek.website 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah, it's correct. What they did is, for every year they place a dot with respect to x and y axis, then connected the dots. An unusual graph, but works well for this situation, IMO.

[-] Strawberry 5 points 1 day ago

I have a degree in math and I'm not cringing

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I don't think they're cringing, this is perfectly correct.

[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

By the definition:

A function f from a set X to a set Y is an assignment of one element of Y to each element of X.

~/s~

[-] InfiniteFlow@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

This is not a function graph, though. It is a Connected Scatterplot.

[-] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

The US is on track to implementing the Euthanasia Coaster.

[-] julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 days ago

Can we please always link to the original data?

[-] will_a113@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

Can you guess when HMOs became a thing (and Blue Cross converted from not-for-profit to for-profit)?

[-] Balthazar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago
[-] will_a113@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

I was asking rhetorically since the graph makes it pretty obvious, but actually re-reading this article it's a bit more complex than I recalled. There was basically some legislation in the mid 1970s that made them possible, the model grew through the 80s, but by the late 80s low-rent HMOs had taken over, and a crippling combo of regulation (to create new barriers to entry) and deregulation (for the existing guys) basically cemented the for-profit HMO/PPO providers that we all know and love (haha) by the 1990s. Had we held out for another decade we probably would have seen socialized medicine by the Clinton-era, but instead we got this graph, where we pay more and get less than everyone else, and half the country thinks it's a great idea.

[-] Atlas_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Australia is definitely not counting deaths due to drop bears

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Whoa, wtf is Polandball doing?
I didn't know such differences still existed (not counting USA ofc).

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Poland has the worst air pollution in the whole of Europe. For one, they still have a lot of coal plants but even more importantly, a lot of homes have never been modernized and still heat with coal too. On top of that, many cars are also old and dirty.

[-] a14o@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

INTERNATIONAL DOLLAR (PPP)

COUNTRY MONEY (GDP)

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 3 points 2 days ago

Not to worry, it’ll soon dip back down as the Almighty, who is also the Invisible Hand Of The Free Market, wills

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago
[-] abfarid@startrek.website 4 points 2 days ago
[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Too chilly hot to chilly chill.

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
245 points (100.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1451 readers
5 users here now

Be respectful

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS