245
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by FundMECFSResearch to c/dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 6 points 2 days ago
[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But in this graph it's correct, isn't it?

A bit of a strange choice of axis, but technically it's correct, I think.
We see how during COVID people died earlier although expenses went up (didn't check the dates, but I guess that's the thing?), and afterwards expenses went down, but people grow older again
Or do I completely misunderstand this?

[-] abfarid@startrek.website 8 points 2 days ago

Yeah, it's correct. What they did is, for every year they place a dot with respect to x and y axis, then connected the dots. An unusual graph, but works well for this situation, IMO.

[-] angrystego@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

I don't think they're cringing, this is perfectly correct.

[-] lnxtx@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

By the definition:

A function f from a set X to a set Y is an assignment of one element of Y to each element of X.

~/s~

[-] InfiniteFlow@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

This is not a function graph, though. It is a Connected Scatterplot.

[-] Strawberry 5 points 1 day ago

I have a degree in math and I'm not cringing

this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
245 points (100.0% liked)

Data is Beautiful

1451 readers
5 users here now

Be respectful

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS