And it's only a matter of time until until he boasts about it by posting someone's SN during an petty online argument.
Why are we coming up with nonsense scare tactic arguments? He's obviously just going to divert federal funds to himself via his companies.
He has no need for a bunch of shitters' SSN when he would just open himself to the greatest class action in history because it would take about 100 million of us to make him any significant wealth.
So does everyone, thanks Equifax
It's weird that SSNs are treated as some sort of secret number given they don't have any security features. They were never supposed to be used the way they're used today, but there's no good alternative yet.
The US really needs a replacement, for example a national digital ID based on PKI (public key infrastructure) where you can generate new ID numbers based on a private key. Each bank, lender, employer, etc that needs it would get a unique ID that only works for them, and you could revoke access for just that one company if needed.
Kinda like how OAuth/OIDC login works, where you can log in to sites using your Google account, Apple account, self-hosted Authentik or Authelia, etc. but the site you're logging in to never sees your password. If a site/app misbehaves, you revoke their access to the account, and everything else that uses the account can keep working.
And also the same thing but for payments, phone numbers, email addresses, physical addresses, etc.
We're all giving away so much personal information every time we make a transaction, and we've all seen what these fuckers do with it.
I agree in principle, but try explaining that to your grandmother.
Here's your ID. You can decide who gets to have it.
Easy. The average person isn't going to care about the nerdy shit behind it, any more than they care how Facebook works behind the scenes.
They've been pushing against a national ID for decades so good luck convincing grandma it's not the mark of the beast or something.
"why can't you just use my SSN like that nice genius billionaire Elon Musk"
"press this button on the app" is what that would boil down to.
Yeah, I tried to help my grandma with installing/using a video conference app... at the end of the day, I just call her (and yes, she still has a landline) :).
The US really needs a replacement, for example a national digital ID based on PKI... you revoke their access to the account, and everything else that uses the account can keep working
There is already an open standard growing around exactly this concept, Web5 Distributed IDs (DID): https://dev.to/tbdevs/what-is-web5-233o
Disclosure: I worked on the implementation for an Open Banking company (does that need to be disclosed? I'm including it lest someone think I'm a shill)
Huh, TIL. Very interesting, thanks for the link!
Yup. My credit has been frozen since that hack.
Everyone has my social security number. It's one of the stupidest security fails of all time that nobody seems to want to fix. And now there is an entire "credit protection" industry so it will remain that way.
What happens when we file our taxes? Will we even get our refunds?
Would be funny if there was a mass movement and nobody paid their taxes.
Unfortunately, most people have their taxes withheld from their paychecks, and file their returns so they get a refund.
If people didn't file returns, the IRS would end up with more money.
Was just worrying about this with my spouse
To be fair the social security number is not exactly the most secure thing in the world. More than likely there's a lot of people who have your social security number and you don't have any clue that they do.
That being said, I don't understand why he's being allowed this kind of access. Even with the Orange douchebag's blessing, there should be other people minding the store. Shouldn't there?
there should be other people minding the store. Shouldn't there?
There was until they were removed and yes man installed
Not mine. I live in a country that isn't an absolute joke.
Must be nice
What’s it like? :(
Keyword unfortunately being "absolute"
Thanks to Verizon/TMobile/AT&T being the swiss cheese fort Knox, I'd be surprised if Felon Skum didn't have it.
Companies have played fast and loose with our PII for so long that it's at a point where we need something else to act as that value so it's actually secret. But with this administration, that would end up being a wrist tattoo....
I already have a suspicion that he might already be leaking information out to third parties from Twitter (private messages, etc.), so...
Why is Facebook 2auth reset harder, than stealing someones identity in US?
Because the social security number has become the default way to uniquely identify an individual in the US despite the fact that it was never intended for that function.
I get that, I just can't comprehend, how you can do anything with it. In my country we have similar thing. We have "Birth number" and it is on every contract we sign. But just knowing it does jack shit. (But yeah, we also have identity card, and that changes number every renewal/loss)
More context:
For online sign you would need atleast 2 identifications (for example Identity cars and passport). And usualy thay make you come anyway to prove you're you.
It is bafeling to me, that some peaple in US have no means of identification.
For a long time, many companies treated the SSN as a sort of secure password that only the individual would know. Some companies still do. Others, like schools and the military, just treated it like what it is. A unique id number. If you know name, address and SSN, it's possible to do a lot of different things that can create headaches for the person who was targeted. New credit cards, bank accounts, loans, transferred utilities, rental agreements.
Authentication and two-factor system have actual security features. Social security numbers have no security features at all. They were never designed to be used as a security token.
Elon Musk and his "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE)
Is that seriously what it's called? Elon Musk is producing enough cringe to power all of human civilization. I have no idea if this is the worst timeline or not, but it's certainly the most embarrassing.
Just to culture shock Americans: it's not exactly the same but in Sweden our personal numbers are kept in the open. Even online. Searchable databases with names, phone numbers, addresses etc. It tells you if someone has a dog. It tells you if they have a car. Which car, even. Some tell you the income of the person you're searching for. Sites even exist that could tell you if I've commited a crime. Some people think that's unreasonable. Irresponsible even!
That said, as pertains to the article, the fact that he has that info seems pretty unreasonable and irresponsible.
At least in the past, you could use a person's ssn to open credit cards, change utilities, and generally ruin someone's life. Someone took out a credit card with my SSN when I was like 9 or 10 and it caused issues when I became an adult and tried to get a student loan for uni.
It's not that we don't have all that info and more available, it's that we want you to pay a data broker for it.
Does he have one?
What is his?
Elon Musk has to go.
Bruh who doesn't at this point?
All of my data got breached multiple times going back to the dot-com bubble days, by Yahoo, the original 2015 OPM Beach and by two of the big credit bureaus for a start. If Musk has my social at this point it doesn't matter.
SSN is not a password and anyone who uses it like one doesn't understand security because you can't change it. It's a user ID, like a finger print or email address.
In principle yes; in practice, no.
I'm sure quite a few people have mine. SSN's aren't a secure thing at all. It should be updated.
You can get anyone's SSN for $15 on the dark web. lol. The amount of leaks/hacks that have happened to all of the companies that require your SSN is insane.
You can get it on the clear web for about $20 completely legitimately. Background checks have been a thing forever and reveal basically everything.
"May or may not, but mostly may."
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.