189
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] terribletortoise@lemmy.world 161 points 6 days ago

"Lauren Boebert makes woman feel threatened and unsafe in the women's bathroom."

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 114 points 6 days ago

Also, "Lauren Boebert cannot distinguish between Sarah McBride and another woman."

[-] Eldest_Malk@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago

If one can’t tell the difference between a transgender woman and a biological woman, perhaps it’s time to shut up about the issue altogether.

But it hurts their fee-fees

[-] finley@lemm.ee 21 points 6 days ago

This is my takeaway

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 135 points 6 days ago

“I made an error regarding a mistaken identity. I apologized, learned a lesson, and it won’t happen again,” Boebert said in a statement.

The fuck it won't. Fascists tend to see their enemies everywhere. It's why simply telling Trump "no, you can't do that" makes you some kind of radical Marxist in his eyes.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 47 points 6 days ago

Did you also notice the part where she thinks the problem is misdirecting her bigotry to attack the wrong person, rather than not being a hateful fucking bitch in the first place?

[-] StarshotJohn@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Learned a lesson my ass

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So basically the opposition should just be radical Marxists anyway since the Republicans are just going to call anyone they disagree with that anyway.

Fat chance if that happening without some kind of forceful takeover of the Democratic party.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 92 points 6 days ago

These fucking people literally do not care about this country, or helping their constituent bases whatsoever. Neglecting your duties should be fucking arrestable.

[-] SnotFlickerman 39 points 6 days ago

Maybe it would be if every dirtbag cop in the country wasn't on their side.

I'm way more worried about the cops becoming Brownshirts than the military.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Becoming? You think they aren't already?

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 6 points 6 days ago

You should be more worried about foreign influence doing a really good job taking down this country from the inside. Cops are just a side effect of this corruption. The Cold War is spicy hot these days.

[-] SnotFlickerman 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Dude as much as there is an amount of foreign interference, I have lived in the USA for over forty years and the people who live here have genuinely always been this fucking dumb so blaming it on the "spicy hot cold war" sounds to me like not being willing to take responsibility for the massive amount of absolutely dumbfuck motherfuckers in the USA.

No, sorry, they're real, and we don't get to pretend that they've just been subject to a foreign influence campaign.

Further, what about the non-foreign influence campaigns like FOX News, One America News Network, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and Xitter? Those are totally okay because they're not foreign? Our own influence campaigns are fine?

And yes, I'm way more worried about people who have the State backing them when it comes to owning guns and being able to violently assault citizens than a fucking foreign influence campaign. Because they're actually here and have actually already been causing massive damage to US social cohesion for fucking decades. Just look up Killology. A foreign influence campaign didn't create Killology, a fucking psychopath ex-military American created it.

So let's go over once again:

  1. Americans are genuinely that fucking dumb.
  2. Our corporations do the same fucking shit to us and they don't even come from a foreign country, they're just worried about money.
  3. The cops have been a violent occupying force who abuse the citizenry and have been for a long fucking time, arguably always.

This just sounds too much like blaming it on everything but our own fucking real homegrown problems.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I mean...both points of view are valid for sure. I'm positive we're in the situation we're in due to collusion and influence from foreign adversaries, but it's because people are so easily led and dumb that it's possible.

[-] SnotFlickerman 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm just saying like all things American, it's a very, very Amerocentric view of the world, where we're the most important and need to be destabilized.

We wrecked our own soft power with the Iraq War and Snowden leaks. No foreign actors forced our hands. Iraq War was just plain stupid and Snowden leaked because his big boss was lying to congress (and has never been punished for it).

Foreign influence kicked up after that because we created an opening with our own fucking hubris by destroying international credibility as well as credibility at home with our own citizens.

Cops were already practicing Killology and being a violent problem in US communities long before the Iraq War and the death of US soft power. (EDIT: In point of fact, the Iraq War was when the cops started to get all that disused military equipment, too. No foreign entity forced that, Bush did. Cops generally didn't have APCs at local departments in the '90's)

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

where we’re the most important and need to be destabilized

I'm far from US-centric, but the US is the most powerful nation in the world right now.

We wrecked our own soft power with the Iraq War and Snowden leaks.

The first Iraq war increased our soft power, the second war pissed all that away, and more, as did the debacle in Afghanistan. On the other hand, the Snowden leaks were largely ignored by most of the world except a few people interested in secure communications and the surveillance state. But no nation-state would be alienated by those revelations, since they all do it.

As for cops, their continuing militarization also has to do with some other Bush-era brain-farts like bringing in the Israelis to train Homeland Security and local cops. It's a miracle we haven't had more 12-year-olds on the casualty lists after that. Colonialist occupiers sure as shit aren't the best people to teach policing by consent. And without community buy-in, cops behave very much like hostile occupying forces.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

The cops have been a violent occupying force who abuse the citizenry and have been for a long fucking time, arguably always.

American police evolved directly from fugitive slave patrols and strike-breaking Pinkertons, so... yeah.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Two or more things can be true at once.

Most of the things you mention have been features of the system for generations. So why have things suddenly gotten worse? What's different now?

One thing is the power of propaganda enabled by social media. Another closely related thing is foreign interference. Do we have our own homegrown scumbags? Of course we do. But only lately have they allied themselves with hostile foreign states to attack the rest of us.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Umm, no.. Study the history of policing. You sound kinda...not smart.

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 6 days ago

Keep going… who are the police working for?

[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Dude. Are you saying they work for (checks notes) foreign influence??

They work for capitalists, buddy. The problem with policing starts way the hell before the cold war was a thing. They're a symptom of capitalism. And foreign influence is a symptom of? C'mon I know you can get there. Wait, no I don't... 🤪

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 6 days ago

They work for the government.

The government is corrupt (for many reasons).

The government is controlled by the ruling class.

The ruling class is the root cause.

The police are just one head of the hydra. If you cut it off, two will come back. That’s not a solution.

[-] forrgott@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago
[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 6 days ago

If it was just capitalism, China wouldn’t have problems—oh wait they’re also capitalist. Hmmm. Maybe you’re right.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago

They're just assholes looking for people to torment.

[-] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

These people have names and addresses.

All humans are not immune to death.

In Minecraft.

[-] Zorsith 4 points 6 days ago

All I'm saying is, people like having certain things in their home, like working sewage, and running water, and electricity.

Be real miserable if that got shut off somehow.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I think it would be much more effective not to shut any of those services off. Rather, ensure very thoroughly that they're all present and accounted for, but just not existing in any of the places they're expecting them to be.

[-] Hubbubbub@fedia.io 65 points 6 days ago

Can't wait for the freakout when a trans man has to use that restroom according to the rules.

[-] bamboo 42 points 6 days ago

Unfortunately in places where this is a law, the response has been violence towards trans men

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

This is what it takes for a lot of them to understand. Having to learn what a trans man looks like and that he is now required to use the women's room next to their daughters.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 6 days ago

Everyone is supposed to use the women's restroom now. Didn't you get the memo?

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

I hope he pisses in the sink as a flex.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 6 days ago

“Bimbo who vapes and acts like an asshole at musicals brings her shitbag behavior to the ladies room.”

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 19 points 6 days ago

Gendered bathrooms are dumb anyway. Let's just get rid of that silly rule and make all bathrooms accessible to everyone

[-] nimble 17 points 6 days ago

Reps. Boebert, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Nancy Mace have made transgender bathroom bans one of their central political culture-war issues.

Our country is on the verge on imploding but im glad our representatives have nothing better to do than play bathroom police. Fucking jokes

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 15 points 6 days ago

I thought we're all legally women now?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Imagine: Beetlebert the qanon fan, thinking she has the right to judge anyone else. This is the woman vaping and jerking her date off in public.

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago
[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 days ago

Gross! Do you think they're in a theatre or something?!

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 10 points 6 days ago
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 15 points 6 days ago
[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

That's right, dear.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
189 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19607 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS