190
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] terribletortoise@lemmy.world 162 points 10 months ago

"Lauren Boebert makes woman feel threatened and unsafe in the women's bathroom."

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 115 points 10 months ago

Also, "Lauren Boebert cannot distinguish between Sarah McBride and another woman."

[-] Eldest_Malk@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

If one can’t tell the difference between a transgender woman and a biological woman, perhaps it’s time to shut up about the issue altogether.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

But it hurts their fee-fees

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 136 points 10 months ago

“I made an error regarding a mistaken identity. I apologized, learned a lesson, and it won’t happen again,” Boebert said in a statement.

The fuck it won't. Fascists tend to see their enemies everywhere. It's why simply telling Trump "no, you can't do that" makes you some kind of radical Marxist in his eyes.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago

Did you also notice the part where she thinks the problem is misdirecting her bigotry to attack the wrong person, rather than not being a hateful fucking bitch in the first place?

[-] StarshotJohn@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Learned a lesson my ass

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

So basically the opposition should just be radical Marxists anyway since the Republicans are just going to call anyone they disagree with that anyway.

Fat chance if that happening without some kind of forceful takeover of the Democratic party.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 94 points 10 months ago

These fucking people literally do not care about this country, or helping their constituent bases whatsoever. Neglecting your duties should be fucking arrestable.

[-] SnotFlickerman 41 points 10 months ago

Maybe it would be if every dirtbag cop in the country wasn't on their side.

I'm way more worried about the cops becoming Brownshirts than the military.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Becoming? You think they aren't already?

[-] blakenong@lemmings.world 6 points 10 months ago

You should be more worried about foreign influence doing a really good job taking down this country from the inside. Cops are just a side effect of this corruption. The Cold War is spicy hot these days.

[-] SnotFlickerman 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Dude as much as there is an amount of foreign interference, I have lived in the USA for over forty years and the people who live here have genuinely always been this fucking dumb so blaming it on the "spicy hot cold war" sounds to me like not being willing to take responsibility for the massive amount of absolutely dumbfuck motherfuckers in the USA.

No, sorry, they're real, and we don't get to pretend that they've just been subject to a foreign influence campaign.

Further, what about the non-foreign influence campaigns like FOX News, One America News Network, Facebook, Instagram, Threads, and Xitter? Those are totally okay because they're not foreign? Our own influence campaigns are fine?

And yes, I'm way more worried about people who have the State backing them when it comes to owning guns and being able to violently assault citizens than a fucking foreign influence campaign. Because they're actually here and have actually already been causing massive damage to US social cohesion for fucking decades. Just look up Killology. A foreign influence campaign didn't create Killology, a fucking psychopath ex-military American created it.

So let's go over once again:

  1. Americans are genuinely that fucking dumb.
  2. Our corporations do the same fucking shit to us and they don't even come from a foreign country, they're just worried about money.
  3. The cops have been a violent occupying force who abuse the citizenry and have been for a long fucking time, arguably always.

This just sounds too much like blaming it on everything but our own fucking real homegrown problems.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I mean...both points of view are valid for sure. I'm positive we're in the situation we're in due to collusion and influence from foreign adversaries, but it's because people are so easily led and dumb that it's possible.

[-] SnotFlickerman 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm just saying like all things American, it's a very, very Amerocentric view of the world, where we're the most important and need to be destabilized.

We wrecked our own soft power with the Iraq War and Snowden leaks. No foreign actors forced our hands. Iraq War was just plain stupid and Snowden leaked because his big boss was lying to congress (and has never been punished for it).

Foreign influence kicked up after that because we created an opening with our own fucking hubris by destroying international credibility as well as credibility at home with our own citizens.

Cops were already practicing Killology and being a violent problem in US communities long before the Iraq War and the death of US soft power. (EDIT: In point of fact, the Iraq War was when the cops started to get all that disused military equipment, too. No foreign entity forced that, Bush did. Cops generally didn't have APCs at local departments in the '90's)

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The cops have been a violent occupying force who abuse the citizenry and have been for a long fucking time, arguably always.

American police evolved directly from fugitive slave patrols and strike-breaking Pinkertons, so... yeah.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

These people have names and addresses.

All humans are not immune to death.

In Minecraft.

[-] Zorsith 4 points 10 months ago

All I'm saying is, people like having certain things in their home, like working sewage, and running water, and electricity.

Be real miserable if that got shut off somehow.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I think it would be much more effective not to shut any of those services off. Rather, ensure very thoroughly that they're all present and accounted for, but just not existing in any of the places they're expecting them to be.

[-] Hubbubbub@fedia.io 65 points 10 months ago

Can't wait for the freakout when a trans man has to use that restroom according to the rules.

[-] bamboo 42 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately in places where this is a law, the response has been violence towards trans men

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

This is what it takes for a lot of them to understand. Having to learn what a trans man looks like and that he is now required to use the women's room next to their daughters.

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 5 points 10 months ago

Everyone is supposed to use the women's restroom now. Didn't you get the memo?

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 33 points 10 months ago

“Bimbo who vapes and acts like an asshole at musicals brings her shitbag behavior to the ladies room.”

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago

Gendered bathrooms are dumb anyway. Let's just get rid of that silly rule and make all bathrooms accessible to everyone

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 15 points 10 months ago

I thought we're all legally women now?

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 11 points 10 months ago
[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago

Gross! Do you think they're in a theatre or something?!

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 10 points 10 months ago
[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 15 points 10 months ago
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Imagine: Beetlebert the qanon fan, thinking she has the right to judge anyone else. This is the woman vaping and jerking her date off in public.

this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
190 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26600 readers
1523 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS