896
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 49 minutes ago

It looks like the recommended Pixelfed instance, pixelfed.social, is running an outdated version of the platform. Aka the instance most new users will login to, and the one I created my account on last year. I guess I could make an account elsewhere, but meh. Hopefully they get that sorted

[-] penguinclaw@lemm.ee 15 points 18 hours ago

Really enjoying Pixelfed. In fact I have found it's fairly smooth going replacing Meta apps and Twitter.

[-] addie@feddit.uk 22 points 1 day ago

Absolutely NO sexuality explicit content. This includes, but not limited to, images/videos/chat around sexual acts. There are other places on the internet for this.

😥

[-] needanke@feddit.org 24 points 1 day ago

Seems fair. There are many places for erotic/porn content on the web. And for a federated network it is good to not force instance owners to manage avoiding the hosting of nudity by federating it.

[-] Gawdl3y@pawb.social 11 points 23 hours ago

Nudity isn't inherently sexual, and they pointedly have not mentioned it in the quoted text. It sounds like only explicit sexual content is forbidden, not nudity.

I do think even this is an overreach for a federated network, though, assuming Pixelfed is enforcing this on all instances (is that even possible?). It should be on the instance owners to make that decision. I couldn't find where the quoted text is sourced from, however.

[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

Someone could just start a NSFW version, right?

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 10 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

There's an "Adult" section in pixelfed.org's instance list

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 22 hours ago

Fortunately we have PMs, right?

[-] mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)
[-] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 17 hours ago

I just read all that along with the "dossier" they compiled and it seemed pretty weak in my view. Yeah, the guy sounds a little bit passive-aggressive, but I think "mental problems" is way too strong an evaluation. That dossier is almost exclusively one-sided too, as in, we only see his posts, and not the context of what he was responding to. Many many people could be made to look bad if only their responses were posted without context. This seems like the worse kind of Fedidrama. I wish I could have the time I spent reading that back.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 64 points 1 day ago
[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

PixelDroid is a client that supports dark mode.

[-] zerozaku@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago

There are tons of apps which don't have a dark mode and you are writing off fediverse app just because it doesn't have it. Fediverse apps should be supported instead being judged harshly.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 23 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

And I don't use them, either. I'm a contributor to multiple Fediverse projects, including Lemmy-based apps and full identity management with ActivityPub. We do not deserve to get held to lower standards if we want the Fediverse to grow, especially when it comes to features that are about things like eye comfort, which can be a mild accessibility issue for some.

Dark mode is a basic necessity in apps today. It's not a convenience, but a necessity for adoption. There are many people who are going to open the app, then never use it again because of something that's bog-standard in the libraries and should only take a few hours to work in, which should have been done before an announcement.

So yes, I speak up, because I want this to succeed.

Edit: And yes, I'm very excited to see the growth achieved in the other post. Fantastic news.

@corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca, @'ing you so I'm not responding in two places 😉 I appreciate the work of the team, but it doesnt change the fact that to many, this is a showstopper and I'm pretty surprised it wasn't considered as a basic UX requirement pre-launch (see other comments in response to you).

[-] finley@lemm.ee 136 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was a member of the beta, and one thing that app really needs is a dark mode.

[-] sjmarf@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

~~It has a dark mode now (on iOS, at least. Maybe they’ve got a different codebase for Android)~~

Edit: Scratch that. Only the login flow has dark mode.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I couldn’t find it in the App Store. How do you get it?

[-] finley@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://apps.apple.com/us/app/pixelfed/id1632519816

Here’s the link. Oddly, it doesn’t show up for me either when I search for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

On that note, has anyone here gotten into the Surf (the Flipboard thing) beta? I got in, but the download link does not work, but from what I understand that's supposed to turn into a whole-federation browser starting with the microblogging sites (Mastodon + Bluesky + Threads), so I wonder whether they'll add support for Pixelfed et al in the future.

[-] sircac@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Wow, I was unaware of this, it looks so promising...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 22 hours ago

Is that like a federated version of flikr?

[-] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

I think it’s supposed to be like old instagram.

[-] DBosiers@social.vivaldi.net 1 points 22 hours ago

@surph_ninja old instagram was good as it was.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

how are they paying for the hosting?

[-] Fitik@fedia.io 54 points 1 day ago

Donations and NLNet grant, you can support Pixelfed yourself

https://pixelfed.org/support-our-project

[-] TheFederatedPipe@fedia.io 31 points 1 day ago

I just installed and is pretty neat. Truly a photo first social media.

[-] TheFederatedPipe@fedia.io 3 points 20 hours ago

Wanted to add, I recently tried #pixelix for #pixelfed, and I might actually like this app better that the official.

https://app.pixelix.social/ https://github.com/daniebeler/pixelix https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.daniebeler.pfpixelix

The beauty of the #openinternet, #freesoftware, #socialweb and #activitypub

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 22 hours ago

Great. Then all the people who just post photos on Lemmy can gtfo

[-] TheFederatedPipe@fedia.io 3 points 21 hours ago

I don't agree, this actually a good opportunity for #pixelfed to support #groups so people who want their post to reach a larger audience can choose a magazine/community to post.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I have a Pixelfed account and have tried the app.

But I can't actually make posts using it. Don't know where the hiccup is.

[-] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 18 hours ago

People are saying that the servers are overloaded at the moment from all the new people trying it out.

[-] garretble@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I wish there was an easy way to know which servers are getting hammered more than others.

I can easily make a post to my server via the website, but the app was giving me trouble, as an example. That's why I wonder where the hiccup is/was. Both the website and app are just interfaces to get data to a server, so if one doesn't work I'd assume the other doesn't too. But I dunno.

Edit: After writing this I went back and tried posting from the app again. It finally worked! I guess things have settled down.

[-] mrnarwall@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

My guess, as a cloud developer, there may be a bottleneck at their authentication, or session management. Your web browser has probably been signed in for a while. I'm guessing your app hasn't been able to get past that point, and is stuck in the bottleneck

[-] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 17 hours ago

For sure.

That's interesting that you were able to post via the website but not the app. It's possible that you were lucky with the website being one of the requests that the server was able to handle, or perhaps the website and app use different pathways and the app pathway was more congested?

Good to hear it worked eventually.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

Is Pixelfed an appropriate place to upload an image to share on Lemmy / Mastodon?

[-] umbraroze@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Well that's the neat part, you don't! If you post on Pixelfed you're already on Mastodon.

...I suppose you can reshare it if you want. Me, I just point people to my Pixelfed account on my Mastodon profile and vice versa.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 1 points 20 hours ago

I wonder if they were thinking like how before Reddit had image galleries, people would use imgur

[-] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 16 points 1 day ago

It’s doable, but you might as well just upload it here. But for smaller albums, it would be a good idea.

[-] Shatur@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I wish we could have multiple photos in posts here. Yes, we can put other photos in the description, but it would be nice to view all of them without opening the post.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FundMECFSResearch 10 points 1 day ago

The Impressia for Pixelfed app has been serving me well the past 6 months.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
896 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

28940 readers
1570 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS