1716
The erasure of Luigi Mangione (substack.evancarroll.com)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by dexa_scantron@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Right now, on Stack Overflow, Luigi Magione’s account has been renamed. Despite having fruitfully contributed to the network he is stripped of his name and his account is now known as “user4616250”.

This appears to violate the creative commons license under which Stack Overflow content is posted.

When the author asked about this:

As of yet, Stack Exchange has not replied to the above post, but they did promptly and within hours gave me a year-long ban for merely raising the question. Of course, they did draft a letter which credited the action to other events that occurred weeks before where I merely upvoted contributions from Luigi and bountied a few of his questions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Reducing someone to a number has never backfired in a revolutionary way. Just ask prisoner 24601

[-] menemen@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

I am a little tired of the idea that "tech" is something extraordinary. Capitalists in a capitalist society will do all evil to fulfill their goal, t3ch or no tech. You could use the same sentence in everything in this society. Even: "... and how green energy always serves the ruling class."

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 7 points 2 hours ago

In this century, there could never be an Anne Frank. Thank social networks.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I had 40k points on SO though I no longer contribute. Stackexchange is basically dead because it's a for-profit with very poor direction and LLMs basically made the entire thing obsolete relative to the monetary growths it needs to be sustainable. Understandably they can't attract any attention like this as they're 🤏 from going under.

I feel a bit sad for stackexchange but they are stuck between a rock and a hard place. I think stackexchange has their days numbered tho so this is realy not all that relevant. Give them a year or two tops

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 1 hour ago

It's sad because Stack Exchange came out because Experts Exchange sucked. And now they also suck.

In the day of AI, will we ever have a new alternative?

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

Yeah I doubt it tbh. I loved my time with stackoverflow and it landed me jobs and friends but I'm quite bullish when it comes IT and AI. It's not replacing devs yet but definitely replacing q&a, debugging tools, code reviews etc already/soon.

I hope we'll have some open social coding experience like SO but trends seem to point towards more private stuff like coaching, bookcamps, shitty discord servers etc. as that's the only thing that can be funded sustainably.

[-] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm Spartacus!

[-] prole 2 points 3 hours ago

Lol @ the "Ross Ulbrecht requested that we keep his username" bullshit.

Oh ok, guys, nevermind. It's not a big deal because the criminal requested that we keep their username...

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 41 points 10 hours ago

Stack being weird and toxic I'm shocked, shocked I tell you

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 44 points 11 hours ago

Assigning to a number like they do prisoners.

Disgusting behaviour from Stack Overflow and the perpetrators.

[-] ToxicWaste@lemm.ee 5 points 9 hours ago

we are all numbers. lemmy.ca has a user number for you, your government has a number for you, your local library has a number for you.

that is just how a digital world works.

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago

What if I told you that television shows were dangerous? It's true. In the year 2000, four out of every five injuries occurred in a home that owned a VHS copy of Robocop III. Someone might say, "That's compelling Robocorrelation, but that data alone does not suggest Robocausation." Fine. But maybe your first instinct was to say, "Robocop III is a movie, not a TV show, you fucking dumbass." If so, then congratulations, idiot, you're a Technical Genius. You're smart enough to spot a technicality, but too dumb to know everyone else did too and it was light years away from the point. You're the kind of person who tells your doctor, "Um, it's Chief Chirpa?" when he tells you that getting the Wicket doll out of your asshole will require surgery. "And, um," you'll add, "it's an action figure? Maybe you should have gone to a non-stupid medical school."

The nice thing about being a Technical Genius is that it feels like proof you're smarter than everyone. They can say you don't "get it" all day, but they're the imbeciles who think Robocop III is a TV show. Look at it like this: You are the only one in the history of Koala Times Bus Tours to contract syphilis from a koala bite. You might be embarrassed, but at least you aren't like those other fools screaming "Don't touch the koala bears!" when they are in fact marsupials. I mean, if koalas were actual bears, your whole face would be missing, not still here and covered in pulsing chancres.

Technical Geniuses reach maximum annoying when they decide that pointing out technicalities is a sense of humor. For instance, if you announced, "My wife is pregnant and we're having a boy," a Technical Genius might quip, "Well, technically only women can have babies. Unless you count the Chief Chirpa action figure currently breaching my anus -- um, which you should, since it is the dictionary definition. Heard of it? Hey, everyone! This idiot with no dictionary is watching me shit out a Chief Chirpa, and he doesn't even know which gender gives birth!"

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'm not a number, I'm a emojii!

[-] yabai@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

He's user number 24601 as far as I'm concerned

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Gione Valgione

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 84 points 14 hours ago

As of yet, Stack Exchange has not replied to the above post, but they did promptly and within hours gave me a year-long ban for merely raising the question.

Laws mean nothing anymore. Therefore licenses mean nothing. Therefore ownership means nothing, and "theft" no longer exists.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 25 points 12 hours ago

Therefore ownership means nothing, and “theft” no longer exists.

WOAH WOAH WOAH... hold on there Circuitfarmer (checks clipboard) It says here you're not nearly affluent enough to circumvent the law... we'll be keeping a close eye on you... --BB

[-] caboose2006@lemm.ee 11 points 11 hours ago

I managed to convince my brother in law by using the wrongful death case of Kanokporn Tangsuan as an example. Framed it as his moral responsibility to never sign up for any digital media ever again since he has a family. I pointed him to a few resources to sail the high seas and he's got his high seas pc hooked up to his TV and cancelled all his subscriptions. I'm so proud.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] FolknForage@lemm.ee 80 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

“No wars but class wars” as true today as when Trotsky said it many decades ago. Not sure how anyone cannot see this very, very clear fact, made self evident by the treatment of Luigi and the composition of the upcoming administration and its supporters.

But every other commoner that sees it needs to take according measures.

Culture is not our friend.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 108 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Apropos of nothing, this was an article about substance from a year ago:

Substack faces user revolt over anti-censorship stance on neo-Nazis

Fuck substack.

Shit, this article is about stack overflow, not substack. Too early, but still fuck substack.

[-] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 17 hours ago

"Censorship forced me to flee a pro-nazi site to another pro-nazi site," is a contradiction worth noting. It highlights the general pro-nazi vibe going around big tech.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world 117 points 19 hours ago

By this logic, everyone charged (not convicted, just charged) should have their accounts and submissions changed in the same manner as Luigi's.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 58 points 18 hours ago

Man I sure wish this'd mean all Trump-generated content and speeches got deleted. That'd be genuinely helpful to the world at least...

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 57 points 17 hours ago

Stopped using stack overflow ages ago because of how many assholes there are there.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 11 hours ago

I got a decade old question closed as a duplicate.

[-] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 14 points 13 hours ago

You don't want to go to Pornhub then

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 8 points 12 hours ago

You'd probably get better coding advice in the comments.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
1716 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60323 readers
3532 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS