1089
submitted 2 years ago by SeaJ@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 294 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You'd think UHC would strive to behave impeccably with all the publicity around them lately. But no: they're so shameless and so greedy they even behave rotten when everybody is busy dissecting their every moves. Amazing...

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 103 points 2 years ago

Why? “Line must go up”

[-] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 years ago

If that were the case, they'd have off'd the CEO themselves. That's multi-millions that could go back to other higher-ups. Then we have a Highlander situation.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 48 points 2 years ago

The CEO serves a very important role in that they get all the fallout for what the board probably wants, and then if there's enough bad publicity, they can fire the CEO and pretend that the CEO acted entirely out of their own volition.

I mean that's not to say they're not greedy bloodsuckers, but they're greedy bloodsuckers that the board needs. Because the board are even bigger greedy bloodsuckers and want to stay out of the news.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago

Because doing otherwise wouldn't maximize profits. There's no actual competition in the market for consumers to choose. Nearly all Americans get insurance through their work, and have absolutely no say in what companies those options are from, and those options might only change at the end of the year if the company changes their insurance partner (which I'm sure takes months to negotiate). UHC has no reason to change unless they are forced to. Customer Satisfaction in the industry is abysmal because there's no incentive for the companies to actually be good.

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

They had their underwriters run the numbers and they determined it's more profitable to continue business as usual and just invest in private security for executives.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 21 points 2 years ago

In Corey Doctorow's short story (Radicalized, in the collection Radicalized) the health fund attackers typically used explosives against the entire board and their support staff

I wonder if that would be more effective

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 163 points 2 years ago

Well shoot, what can be done to fix this?

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 2 years ago

Your second word.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 61 points 2 years ago

Let’s take aim at this problem

[-] samus12345@lemm.ee 52 points 2 years ago

CEOs will be blown away by the answer.

[-] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 39 points 2 years ago

Whatever idea we come up with is worth a shot

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 126 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] kipo@lemm.ee 24 points 2 years ago

Yeah, every story like this plants a seed in someone's mind to be the next Luigi. UHC executives are cultivating their own demise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ImADifferentBird 122 points 2 years ago
[-] Smashfire@lemmy.world 106 points 2 years ago
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 92 points 2 years ago

What's she gonna do, appeal?

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 23 points 2 years ago

That type of delay works for them just as well as any other.

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 79 points 2 years ago

Ai: "It is safe and profitable to deny this claim as she is unlikely to seek vengeance."

[-] rocci@lemmy.ml 79 points 2 years ago

Fuck this system, it's absolute trash.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HarmlessCake@discuss.tchncs.de 70 points 2 years ago

How Many Times Do We Have to Teach You This Lesson, Old Man?

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago

Brian Thompson didn't learn shit he's dead. And I doubt that Stephen J. Hemsley, the Executive Chairman of UnitedHealth Group and Brian Thompson's co-defendent in an insider trading lawsuit, likely didn't learn squat either but is currently still alive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 69 points 2 years ago

Respect to the doctor for publicly shaming United Healthcare.

[-] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 68 points 2 years ago

They could put out a story like this every minute of every day and never run out. Burn it all down indeed

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 67 points 2 years ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago
[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 34 points 2 years ago

Stephen Helmsley:

He was managing partner and chief financial officer at Arthur Andersen.

Super shocking that he was doing insider trading at UHC. They hired a known crook and paid him tens of millions a year.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago

I'll put the CEO in a coma.

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 25 points 2 years ago

And I'd vote you not guilty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago

Funny way to spell murders

[-] BigLime@lemmy.ml 46 points 2 years ago

Dial L for Luigi

[-] poo@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago

Huh, guess a few more CEOs need to catch some bullets before things change. Mario Brothers, you know what to do!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Remember remember, the 4th of December...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

I bet the new United Healthcare CEO (or whomever is in currently in charge) is le pooping their pants right about now.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

And cleaning it up with hundred dollar bills.

Fuck these rich assholes

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

You must wonder if the board has a death wish at this point, otherwise they must be confident their 24/7 security is up the task

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot 27 points 2 years ago

united healthcare looked at bob kelso and was like this guy is the hero of the series.

[-] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

Bob actually tried to milk the insurance companies for money, IIRC. He wasn't entirely a monster, but definitely had no chill.

Dr. Bob Kelso: What the hell people? I saw Maggie Kent in the park. Why didn't we treat her?
Nurse Carla Espinosa: She has no insurance.
Dr. Bob Kelso: Well, why didn't we do what we always do? Why didn't you fix it while I turned my back and pretend not to notice? You know the dance.
[-] cupcakezealot 21 points 2 years ago

he definitely mellowed out as the series went on though in the first episode he did come up with

Dr. Dorian, do you not realize that you're nothing but a large pair of scrubs to me? For God's sake, the only reason I carry this chart around is so I can pretend to remember your damn names! Now look, if the patient has insurance, you treat them; if they don't, you show them the door.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] genuineparts@infosec.pub 26 points 2 years ago

Deny, Delay, Defend.... may I add: Dispose?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 years ago

Denial accomplished. Time to Defend and Depose. Fuck you United Healthcare! My heaven is witnessing your hell.

[-] psoul@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

UHC is like: What is she gonna do? Wake up?

[-] RagingSnarkasm@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

"We have a fiduciary responsibility to kill these drags on our profits."

--UHC Executives, probably

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jamablaya@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

"Coma victims have poor aim" United Health, prpobably

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
1089 points (100.0% liked)

News

38879 readers
1817 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS