[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

This whole piece is un-australian for exposing a great Australian past time.

This video should be removed for national security (to protect our fun).

Luckily most visitors to our country won't see this video ;)

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Yes? But also, he did order it.

I think the downvoted are because we don't know what you're trying to say.

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

What? Could you link me the quote for that. 100 million? Surely this can't be a number they said.

There is no way 1/3 of the population are there illegally (their justification for removing them), right?

May the multiverse gods have mercy on our timeline...

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

I think you're showing your lack of knowledge on the subject with this comment.

It's well-known that both governments claim sovereignty over all of China, and both include Taiwan as part of that. Just this is claimed less strongly when the KMT aren't in power.

Many people on the island want the status quo, or independence, but others also want some form of reunification. Opinions are varied.

The official position still is that there is one China. (The government in Taiwan even claims the 9 dash line in the south China sea lol)

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

The difference is Trump is not even bothering with the pretence lol

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Great frogs think alike ❤️

Just letting you know the Australia link seems to be broken.

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Calvin and Habs need to make a new episode of gullible judge

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago

China isn't socialist though, I'm sick of both tankies and right wingers pretending that it is.

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Journalists are the number 1 cause of semantic bleaching it seems

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Apologies for that. Unless a mod asks me to remove I'm gonna leave it for now

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It does make me feel better, many thanks.

Feel free to do as you please in the privacy of your own notes haha

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

May I at least preach about the good word of always using 4-digit years?

333
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MisterFrog@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Follow up video from MegaLag on the Honey scandal.

454

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/37503290

Young Republican kids

The Jabbamensch

43
16

Engineering references that specify formulas with variables with specified units, instead of constants with defined units, are a travesty.

I refer to Crane Technical Paper 410 in this instance.

Why would I want

ΔP = 32000 μ L v/d^2 (for laminar flow)

You'd expect this to be a normal formula, which you do your own dimensional analysis, but no. Units are specified. But not even on the same page, no no, on a "nomenclature" page you have to know to look for.

ΔP in Pa

μ in cP

L in m

v in m/s

d in mm

When I could have

ΔP=32 μ L v/D²

and YOU use whatever units you want.

Hell I could even put imperial units in here if I were a masochist. Very upsetting.

Engineering textbooks/technical papers need to find Pure Math Jesus.

Formulas with hidden units? Not even once.

Crane TP 410. How could you?

19
5
57
Roses are expensive (lemmy.world)

Apparently 30 roses is $200 AUD ($126 USD).

Florists making a killing today.

42
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by MisterFrog@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

I really want a Facebook (the old Facebook timeline) replacement, but end-to-end encrypted, and decentralised so there's longevity.

Edit for clarity: I'm looking for a way to share things online, end-to-end encrypted to a wide-audience that knows you but doesn't necessarily know each other.

This is why messaging apps don't fulfil this requirement, and chat rooms (like Matrix) also don't fit.


I love Lemmy, I like the idea of Mastodon (twitter-like sites just aren't my thing. ActivityPub rocks. However, none of them are encrypted.

PixelFed is neato, but I don't plan sharing my personal photos with the whole of the internet, which seems to be the only choice with ActivityPub.

Signal and other encrypted messaging apps are great, but are for direct messaging. Where are the encrypted social media apps?

Matrix is cool and all, but it's aimed at groups. Like discord / MS teams replacement.

Someone told me about Futo Circles, which seems to tick all the boxes and built on top of Matrix, but it's currently abandoned.

Are there any other alternatives? My wallet is open, I would very much like to use such an app. I am no programmer, so sadly cannot take on the mantle of continuing the Futo Circles project.

12
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MisterFrog@lemmy.world to c/signal@lemmy.ml

I'm aware of how to set up chat backups on Android, but this only makes local backups that you have to manually upload or copy.

I'm trying to find a solution where I can set and forget backups to the cloud.

My requirements are:

  1. It doesn't require me exposing the rest of my file system/cloud storage to a third party app without scoping (filesync works, but doesn't meet this criteria).
  2. It can upload directly to a cloud service

So far, no dice :/

Is there some workaround?

P.S. my potential solution is move Signal to my Shelter Work profile, where I do have filesync installed, but then I won't have contacts access, which is a slight pain (and because I don't want to create contacts in my work profile).

203

@gofsckyourself@lemmy.world

191
I dislike charity. (lemmy.world)

Most recent example: I was asked to participate/lead our team's Movember campaign at my company.

How I politely declined: oh sorry, I'm a bit too busy with my personal life and work projects this year.

My unpopular opinion I couldn't say: it doesn't align with my values.

Movember raises money and promotes awareness of Men's health. Nothing wrong with the organisation themselves, but frankly I think the paltry couple of thousand of dollars our (pretty large) company manages to raise each year is a waste of time.

If we taxed corporations a fraction of a percent more on corporate profits we would bring is orders of magnitude more money than individuals asking others, out of the kindness of the hearts, for money.

Health research shouldn't have to beg for money, the government should just fund it with tax dollars. Taxes that you don't get to choose to pay. Other than by voting.

I hate fun runs, and do subtly judge those who participate in them, especially because (I think) they skew towards wealthier people, and it's their way of making themselves feel good for raising money for cancer or whatever, and then turn around and vote for tax cuts, and use accountants to make their tax liability as low as possible - something poorer people can't afford.

I used to give money to charity when I was younger. But I honestly think it's silly now, and it ought not have to exist.

(Mods, this is politics adjacent, but I feel is general enough to be compliant, since I'd say most people view charity organisations mostly favourably)

284
view more: next ›

MisterFrog

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF