998
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

this is probably just an internal threat to bring dissenting republicans in line, nothing to see for us here since it likely won't be realized

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago

Marjorie Taylor Greene may yet be our Gollum.

[-] sozesoze@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

What a hilarious way to put it

[-] chetradley@lemm.ee 73 points 1 day ago

The tweet in question to save you the click.

The replies are hilarious. Everyone is 100% in favor of this idea, but the MAGA dipshits don't realize she's literally only doing this to protect a pedophile sex trafficker.

So, MTGs plan is to call out the entire Republican party as corrupt and rally her supporters to air their dirty laundry to the public. Truly fantastic, MTG. Please don't let anyone talk you out of it.

[-] A_Filthy_Weeaboo@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 89 points 1 day ago
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Is that tim pool without his beanie?

[-] Kalysta@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago

Does she think this is a burn? It’s absolutely what should happen.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Am..Am I agreeing with Marjorie Taylor Greene?

Is..Is Marjorie Taylor Greene making smart, intelligent, good points?

We really are in bizarro world.

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

When Democrat politicians fuck up, other Democrats will absolutely call for, and get, resignations. Even things that boil down to consenting adults in privacy can result in resignations when it's seen to compromise a politician.

When Republicans fuck up, the party circles the wagons and goes full defensive. They will absolutely fight to resist any calls to resign, using any tactic they can think of to keep their latest pedo/pervert/con man/criminal in power. Only if the evidence is incontrovertible, and the outcry impossible to ignore, will they ever consider resignation, and as we've seen with Gaetz, that's not even necessarily the end of their career.

MTG is exactly the kind of brainlet to think that Democrats work the same way Republicans do. She thinks "Release all the Ethics reports" will make Democrats back down, or at least intimidate them. A party agreeing to release ethics reports relating to their own people is utterly unthinkable to her.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Well, thank you for coming in and ruining the moment with your facts and reason and obvious statements and common sense

[-] Denalduh@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

A broken clock is still right 2 times a day.

You're giving her too much credit.

[-] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Don't worry, you agree with her words but not her intent. She doesn't actually want to do it, she just wants to use the threat of it to keep Gaetz's report secret.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Marjorie Taylor Greene thinks that the Democratic party is far more morally corrupt than the Republican party. So therefore she believes that this is a nuclear option she does not realize that this is what everyone literally wants, well everyone except for the people in her own party.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Don't worry, she's not, at least not on purpose. Even a blind pig can find an acorn once in a while.
Pretty sure she's being sarcastic.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sorry to burst everyone's bubble but this isn't an actual suggestion to release the Gaetz report.

It's a threat directed at other Republicans that if we are going to release the Gaetz report, we're going to release many other reports too.

Marjorie is a die-hard bootlicker, and she's not going to break lines with Trump.

Her full tweet is in the article. The headline only touches on her intentions.

[-] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago

I mean, it doesn't detract the sentiment of the people. Do it. People want to see the ethic reports on everyone in a position of power.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ok.

Do it.

The overwhelming problem is that the Dems tend to hold their members accountable while the republicans absolutely DGAF and happily keep literal criminals in their ranks.

She’s basically acknowledging there’s plenty of dirt, but the only offenses they’ll care about is their opponents’.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] problematicPanther@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

fuckin do it. don't threaten me with a good time.

edit word

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 200 points 2 days ago

Just make them all public all the time! That'll show those fucking libs.

As a liberal I would be so fucking owned by this

[-] Frog@lemmy.ca 123 points 2 days ago

I don't care if they are Republican or Democrat. If they are criminals, they should go to jail. Release the Epstein files and send Bill and Trump to jail.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago

Thats the thing I don't think they get.

"Ok, well our guy will go to jail, but so will yours!!!"

"That's fine."

"But then we BOTH lose!"

"This isn't a MAD doctrine situation. This is supposed to be more like a scorched earth situation. No corruption left behind."

And I don't think they grasp that.

[-] huginn@feddit.it 49 points 2 days ago

What they don't grasp is that we'd send our guy to jail: because they won't.

That's the difference.

When a corrupt democrat is exposed they're expelled (bye bye Cuomo)

When a corrupt republican is exposed they're re-elected.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago

Holy shit I agree with MTG

Harambe truly was this universe's anchor being, and the decay is increasing exponentially

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 48 points 2 days ago

Let me stretch first. Don't want to pull anything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 372 points 2 days ago

This argument reveals that she thinks both sides are playing the same game. Progressives don't support corrupt leaders. MTG does.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 151 points 2 days ago

Then who is supporting Nancy Pelosi?

Quip aside, let's bring on the sunlight.

[-] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 113 points 2 days ago

Honestly don't know anyone that likes Pelosi.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't know why anyone likes neoliberals.

She's a model one.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/16/nancy-pelosi-federal-lawmakers-should-be-able-to-trade-stock.html

I vote blue with my nose held as always for harm reduction, but neoliberals like Pelosi are why so many actual leftwing people that want a society walked away, they have no party that isnt enthusiastically part of the root problem of maintaining crony market capitalism at society's catastrophic expense.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 217 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Deal

Edit: no takebacks

[-] ToAllPointsWest@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Ummm, Ok!!! Don't threaten me with a good time

[-] Astronauticaldb@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

Even a broken clock is right twice a day...

[-] Catoblepas 168 points 2 days ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

She's right and all...

But will it actually matter? The public voted for a pedo rapist felon. Surely if the triple threat is your pick for president, to be considered "incompatible" you would have had to do something truly horrific.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] islands@lemmy.cafe 78 points 2 days ago

"For my Republican colleagues in the House and Senate, If we are going to release ethics reports and rip apart our own that Trump has appointed, then put it ALL out there for the American people to see. Yes.. all the ethics reports and claims including the one I filed, all your sexual harassment and assault claims that were secretly settled paying off victims with tax payer money, the entire Jeffrey Epstein files, tapes, recordings, witness interviews. But not just those, there's more, Epstein wasn't/isn't the only asset. If we're going to dance, let's all dance in the sunlight. I'll make sure we do," the lawmaker said in a post on X.

Interesting, she's going the Madison Crawthorn route. Remember what happened to him? They dished up all the dirt they could find on him and hung him out to dry. This sounds noble of her, but she's using this as a threat to try to force them not to go after Gaetz, her pedophile buddy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] frigidaphelion@lemmy.world 142 points 2 days ago

The amount of cognitive dissonance I got from reading something MTG said that I actually agree with was nuts

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Its actually clever. When the repubs block the release of the reports she will claim the dems balked at releasing the reports because they are the dirty ones.

How many of these ethics reports even really exist? Gaetz existed I thought because he was under investigation for his crimes and they said if he dropped out it would be sealed.

Do they actually have reports for everyone? If so that's great, but I can't imagine they were actually investigating every person in the same manner.

[-] holycrap@lemm.ee 68 points 2 days ago

I don't think this is as stupid as it sounds. With some exceptions Democratic voters tend to punish their representatives for corruption, but republican voters never do

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 40 points 2 days ago

So you're saying she's betting that while republicans will have significantly more corruption, democrats will be the only ones punished because their voter base is the only one that actually cares? Honestly, you could very well be right about the result of a hypothetical universal ethic report release, though I'd be surprised if MTG was smart enough to think 2 steps ahead like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 104 points 2 days ago

Something something broken clock

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] auzy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Especially looking forward to all those Biden ethics violations they spent months trying to find and millions of dollars

It will probably be a short read compared to the comey report though

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
998 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

12348 readers
270 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS