703
Oops (lemmy.world)
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Squorlple@lemmy.world 88 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

As if the average consumer thinks about advertisements to any degree of depth

Edit: also, the artist forgot to color the front part of the advertisee’s shirt. Ironic.

[-] zagaberoo@sopuli.xyz 30 points 4 days ago

Naw, the guy's just a slut like that.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

And the left side of the advertiser's lapel.

Yeah, an AI would have drawn it better (apart from the text, they suck at that).

Also not a fan of comics that just state an opinion without any punch line or twist.

[-] Klear@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Implying deep thinking about advertisements is the winning strategy here...

[-] MagnyusG@lemmy.world 53 points 4 days ago

especially considering Coca Cola is one of the richest companies on the planet, they could afford literally whatever artist they want, and yet they choose AI slop, because it's "cheaper."

richest companies on the planet

What kills me is how fucking awful their choice of slop is, since you'd assume their marketing budget is larger than the GDP of several small countries combined.

Like if you want to peddle slop, at least peddle good slop, and not something that would have been laughably bad years ago.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 9 points 4 days ago

But if marketing manager 03427-B is able to save $5K on human generated art and launch the ad ahead of schedule that might tack another hundred bucks on his bonus next year!

[-] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Easy way to make line go up.

[-] _____@lemm.ee 17 points 4 days ago

100% what I think about this store that opened up close to me. it has AI food product images, whats the point? I sincerely dont understand how they think it helps

[-] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 days ago

I wonder how much it matters for most people, though. If it's cheap then people probs still would buy.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

I dislike this as much as the "fake food pictures" you see on commercials or advertising. Where all the food is plastic and shiny, mayonnaise is glue and all that shit to trick people.

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

I mean, if it means the end of the advertisement industry, more power to the AIs.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 15 points 4 days ago

Bold of you to assume this will actually stop anything.

It's like the Nigerian prince scam emails with inentionally bad grammar. They don't want to waste their time with people who don't fall for obvious scams, so they craft their email so that anyone with half a brain will reject it. And they still get millions of responses.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

The craziest ad i have ever seen was this billboard around the time they tried to outlaw cigarettes commercials or something. They had an ad on the billboard that said: "no more cigarette advertisment? What's next? No more sausage advertisements?

Every time i saw that i was just like: yes, obviously, is that an argument with someone?

[-] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 days ago

My uncle thinks every ai generated pic is real.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

They're not the only ones. And in the future there will only be more of them.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago
[-] sag@lemm.ee 12 points 4 days ago

I think images on https://join-lemmy.org/ is AI generated too? Or Is it stock images? Sorry, If I am wrong.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 days ago

We're definitely too poor to hire artists 😅

[-] LMagicalus@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 days ago

This is from the image for Open Source DEFINITELY AI.

[-] nailbar@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 days ago

Some of them look very AI generated.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

You don't need AI to generate hack art. Corporate Memphis aesthetic has been around for ages precisely because its cheap, hacky clip-art you can apply to ad copy in order to give it a hint of life without spending much money.

These AI models make the new art comparatively dirt cheap (if you ignore all the negative external costs) without relying on the even more cheap and bland techniques of the past. It's absolutely "better" relative to what's come before.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 4 days ago

(if you ignore all the negative external costs)

This applies so much in so many different areas of society that we should have a Unicode character that’s like an asterisk but this is the only caveat that it represents.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This isn't AI, but I have discovered now that I am back in the job market that companies are realizing that "they watch any shit on YouTube, we don't need people who know how to shoot and edit video. Carstairs, you have an iPhone. Go download some free software and shoot the commercial" doesn't work very well when it comes to advertising.

So I think there might be hope for visual artists as well.

[-] nicknonya 4 points 4 days ago

original by @MojoboJomo on xitter

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Cool.

Death to Xitter.

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
703 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

1429 readers
48 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS